alexwilkins.bsky.social
journalist with New Scientist focusing on physics, space and tech.
https://www.alex-wilkins.com/
61 posts
833 followers
935 following
Prolific Poster
comment in response to
post
Scientists often have disagreements about how to interpret data and results, but it's quite remarkable just how wide the range of interpretations has become for whether we have found life on K2-18b.
comment in response to
post
Nikku Madhusudhan, one of the original researchers, said this makes him "slightly more confident" the original detection of the apparent biomolecule dimethyl sulphide was correct.
But other researchers have the opposite view, saying it is a "major change in interpretation within just one month".
comment in response to
post
Their online splash was different, which is maybe what you're remembering bsky.app/profile/rowh...
comment in response to
post
It's important to find whether alternative abiotic processes exist, but they would also need to be capable of producing the right amount of DMS too, or explain how they can deliver it to an atmosphere. Again, for a hypothetical 5 sigma watertight detection.
comment in response to
post
True - but another caveat to the caveat. The apparent concentrations of DMS, *if true* (big if), are far greater than the small concentrations found in comets, and would require an insanely high rate of cometary delivery to sustain the levels that might be in K2-18b's atmosphere.
comment in response to
post
But thanks to Euclid, a new powerful space telescope scanning over a third of the night sky, we can see it.
“It’s like someone with bad eyesight putting their glasses on,” one researcher told me.
Read the full article, and see the full picture, here: www.newscientist.com/article/2467...
comment in response to
post
Read the story here: www.newscientist.com/article/2464...
comment in response to
post
Agree it's a generous use of gently!