algiskuliukas.bsky.social
Son of Romanian/Lithuanian refugees. Born in the UK and culturally English. Nottingham Forest fan for 50 yrs. Married to Lesley. 4 kids. Was SQL Server and Access 'guru'. Studied the Wading Hypothesis. MSc from UCL. Moved to Australia to do a PhD at UWA.
540 posts
241 followers
47 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
If you exaggerate anything you can make it sound silly. You are misrepresenting a perfectly plausible and evidence-based set of ideas: Waterside hypotheses of human evolution. See www.whattalks.com
comment in response to
post
Totally. It is wrong to call it pseudoscience. Waterside hypotheses of human evolution (as they, plural, should be called) are perfectly plausible and evidence-based. See www.whattalks.com
comment in response to
post
She wrote several more books on the subject that were far better, IMO.
comment in response to
post
Slava Ukraini!!
comment in response to
post
... and off they go. Next it'll be a blocking. Too high a climb? Pontzer and his minions can't even engage in a rational debate about what it actually is they think is worthy of poking fun at.
The response to Morgan et al has been, and continues to be, a scandal of Piltdown proportions.
comment in response to
post
You say you disagree with the hypothesis but, see, we don't think you even know what it is. If you have exaggerated the idea to breaking point then, of course, you'll "disagree".
comment in response to
post
Then why did you provoke a response by posting a typically sneering comment? Can't you see how frustrating this is to those of us who have taken the trouble to study these ideas? You are behaving like a creationist.
comment in response to
post
Like I say... pseudoskeptics. The response to waterside hypotheses really is a scandal of Piltdown proportions.
comment in response to
post
Oh, for heaven's sake.
Kevin Hunt's study of chimpanzees in Gombe found a level of "bipedalism" of 2-3%. 80% of those instances were in trees whilst >50% of their body wt was on hindlimbs. If he'd have studied bonobos in the Congo, wading would have dwarfed those figures. doi.org/10.1002/ajpa...
comment in response to
post
They all know "it's" wrong but they can't even tell you what "it" is. Pseudoskeptics.
comment in response to
post
Please explain. Waist deep water is the one and only scenario that will compel an otherwise quadrupedal ape to move bipedally without the support of the upper limbs, for as long as the conditions prevail. It is 100% consistent with the fossil record. For example Lucy's Hadar was a wetland for 1Mys.
comment in response to
post
The Wading hypothesis, to cite just one out of a dozen, is head and shoulders above the other published ideas in terms of evidence and plausibility. Richard Wrangham, Chris Stringer and others have given some support over the years, but to back Elaine Morgan is still seen as a career ending act.
comment in response to
post
I returned to academia 30 yrs ago to do just that. MSc (with distinction) under Leslie Aiello @UCL & PhD under Charles Oxnard @UWA. I've done a lot of work, but to no avail. People like Pontzer stand as the gatekeepers of the truth at academic journals. He's sure it's wrong but can't quite say why.
comment in response to
post
Nonsense. Waterside hypotheses of human evolution are entirely plausible and evidence-based.
comment in response to
post
Gutsick Gibbon is usually pretty good but this video is not. She cherry picks a very dodgy proponent as a straw man to knock over. Notice the pseudo-sciencey image she uses. Why not one of the many authentic photos/videos of wading apes?
youtu.be/WeR5lxWXbOU?...
comment in response to
post
Such confidence. Perhaps Herman Pontzer might actually cite a paper where the idea was even defined properly, let alone rebutted.
See www.whattalks.com
comment in response to
post
Where is the push back?
comment in response to
post
Where is the push back?
A few weeks ago there seemed to be some momentum growing against crooktraitor Trump but that seems to have dwindled. Have people given up or have authorities started clamping down on demos?
comment in response to
post
What we're witnessing is effectively a coup d'etat. Currently, the Kremlin is in charge of the White House.
It's not something anyone wants to seriously consider, perhaps understandably. But the longer influencers stay quiet about this, the more difficult it will be for America to push back.
comment in response to
post
In science we invoke Occam's Razor: test the simplest hypothesis before considering more complex ones. With Trump, the simplest hypothesis is that he's a Kremlin agent. Yet very few of the experts, or professionals who are paid to understand these things, dare even hint at the possibility.
comment in response to
post
Haideți, române... Nu vă băgați în seamă cu marioneta rusească!
comment in response to
post
I disagree. As long as you check the answers and maintain a level of scepticism it can be a very powerful research tool.
comment in response to
post
Any queries with the data welcomed.
comment in response to
post
It was eleven years ago.
Moscovia has committed 40,000+ more war crimes since this.
I guess in half a million years, Moscovia's Kleptofascist terrorists can expect justice.
comment in response to
post
Moscovia is a terrorist state.
comment in response to
post
I don't know why my FB stream is suddenly filled with your video clips, but I'm glad it gave me a heads up about your great work.
Please keep doing what you're doing.
My only query is: have you ever made the point to a MAGA cultist that Trump might actually be a Kremlin asset? If not, why not?
comment in response to
post
Moscovian terrorist bastards.
comment in response to
post
Lock Him Up, for "God's" sake.
comment in response to
post
KGB man.
comment in response to
post
Excellent summary.
Just misses one, tiny, point: the orange-faced crooktraitor is a Kremlin asset.
comment in response to
post
E X T E R M I N A T E ! !
comment in response to
post
The most important thing is to realise is that he is a Kremlin asset. We are witnessing a coup d'état of the USA by fascist Russia. All this faux confusion about Trump's motives vis-à-vis Putin would be comical if it were not so serious.
I get it. It's embarrassing. But please do wake up.
comment in response to
post
Aw come off it, Chris. Listen to yourself. Women's sport has never been stronger or better respected. You're literally repeating the fascist playbook here.
Are you a closet Trump supporter?
All this because I shared a post showing the science that there is more to sex determination than XX/XY.
comment in response to
post
I'd never even heard of CeCe Telfer before this. When I searched Craig Telfer I got info about a Scottish Football Pundit. Clearly this person has triggered a lot of reaction in those looking to get angry about transgender issues, but, please, it really isn't as big a deal as you make out.
comment in response to
post
Such hostility. You are playing into the hands of fascists by reacting like this. This is what they want: to whip up hatred against the "LGBTs" you attack. Calm down. It's complicated. Be empathetic, not belligerent, to the minorities... please.
comment in response to
post
Chris, the whole point of that post was to show the science is more complex than XX = female, XY = male, which is what the anti-woke brigade want to believe.
comment in response to
post
The fascists would have found something else to divide us on, if not this. If the anti-wokers can cite "oh it's a tiny minority etc" so can I. I'd never even heard of these one or two athletes. The finer points of competitive sport is hardly a major issue to fight about.
comment in response to
post
Chris, this "they are statistical outliers" argument misses the point. If you are one of those outliers, you are still a human being who deserves total respect and not to be labelled "atypical" and just dismissed.
It's a fascist trope to pretend things are simpler than they area.
comment in response to
post
... apart from the last bit. "God" didn't have anything to do with it.
comment in response to
post
See also www.whattalks.com and www.riverapes.com
comment in response to
post
Thank you for reminding us of that.
She was a wonderful woman and inspired me to return to academia to study these very plausible and evidence-based ideas - for which I prefer the umbrella label "Waterside Hypotheses of Human Evolution.
My pride and joy...
www.amazon.com.au/dp/B08MB9LMJ...