amandaaphill.bsky.social
PhD student @cardiffJOMEC. Research about the Court of Protection: Family experiences, media representations and use of social media
Core team member of openjusticecourtofprotection.org
59 posts
585 followers
954 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
thank you for the detail in this analysis. It has given me a lot to think about
comment in response to
post
I have a lot of sympathy for these concerns, and the Supreme Court recognised them too - it accepts the use of injunctions during proceedings and doesn't completely rule out indefinite injunctions. That being said, indefinite injunctions are such a serious infringement of free expression
comment in response to
post
We’ve recently published a blog about Cardiff Court of Protection - mixed results!
openjusticecourtofprotection.org/2025/04/15/t...
comment in response to
post
Thank you Diane
comment in response to
post
Just read this succinct, powerful and informative blog. As a recently qualified BIA, this was a very helpful read thank you.
comment in response to
post
A very interesting guest post about the term DoL. This is something I've noticed when observing Court of Protection hearings too. I came across this recently about Relevant Person's Representative (RPR), in an easy-read document from an advocacy organisation. The S stands for safeguards of course
comment in response to
post
I keep reminding myself that interrupting when things aren't transparent is our job! It often feels uncomfortable, awkward or even rude. But if we don't call it out, the system will just continue to exclude us. We need to speak up and make sure we're on their radar.
comment in response to
post
Thanks Julie - I did feel really stupid and frustrated. And I’m not sure I would do anything differently another time either, for fear of interrupting. Although the emptying corridors would cause inner alarm bells to ring …..
comment in response to
post
Thank you!
comment in response to
post
Thank you for taking the time to explain that! So if I understand, simplistically, an English court’s jurisdiction, including injunctions, could apply to somebody outside of England. Just the High Court? (I’m speaking generally, not specifically about the American plane situation)
comment in response to
post
@giffordhead.co.uk , I’m not a lawyer . Could you explain your comment in lay person’s language as I’m interested to know more about what you mean ( re jurisdiction, injunctions and England). Thanks!