andrewbowdensmith.bsky.social
Culture wars stoke climate change. I have qualified to post graduate level in sciences and arts. I love Spaniels and have restored rivers that have been featured on the cover of Nature Water.
507 posts
379 followers
1,090 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Seems qualified to comment 🤫
comment in response to
post
Comprehension is key to education. So it would seem you have no meaningful education.
comment in response to
post
Oh, I don't live in, nor have I ever lived in, the USA. But I am mortified that the UK education system produced you.
comment in response to
post
No I am talking about you. And your inability to tell that is yet more proof I was correct.
comment in response to
post
It seems to be mentally challenged
comment in response to
post
When is it not moron season?
comment in response to
post
Fool them once shame on Trump. Fool them twice and they become detestable.
comment in response to
post
Depends entirely how often their phone went off at night for reasons that should not have involved them.
comment in response to
post
Dr David Cartland as NIH head?
comment in response to
post
It's also past tense so no longer in force
comment in response to
post
Bourbon, and Filson. That's it.
comment in response to
post
There is now
comment in response to
post
It is entirely still likely he will be beaten in the second round.
comment in response to
post
Well that sort of proves your point
comment in response to
post
📌
comment in response to
post
🤞
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Short answer is no
comment in response to
post
Here's mine
comment in response to
post
Bad news the current US administration will jail anyone producing any new technology vaccine. Perhaps not, but it increasingly looks that way.
comment in response to
post
Not on a global average they were not.
comment in response to
post
There are bunkers at Mar e Lago
comment in response to
post
Lettuce Say? Another option
comment in response to
post
That looks legit
comment in response to
post
The disgraced president didn't do enough groundwork. He left the judiciary in place without sufficiently stacking the odds in his favour. Then he only had North Korean bogeymen as his excuse.
comment in response to
post
The USA runs a trade surplus with the UK already. The 10% is absurd. He will craete a trade deficit as UK consumers avoid American goods and services.
comment in response to
post
I guess I don't understand the sport. I thought they flew home.
comment in response to
post
At that point sea level would be 70 metres higher. That alone makes it ludicrously optimistic.
comment in response to
post
An argument that stands up only if comparing an electoral system that at least allows liberal democracy. But you have failed to cite one
comment in response to
post
If you time line his plot writing, he hasn't had final say on anything until Yellowstone. Subsequently his prequels are presenting women multifacetly, an arsito, a Bostonian an Irish matriarch, a Native American survivor, the first actual female marshall.
comment in response to
post
I think his long form is more nuanced TBF.
comment in response to
post
Honestly Beth is Yellowstone is way more problematic.
comment in response to
post
Yes. Are you implying that a women from an entirely different culture, excommunicated from their home support network, without money, 1923 USA should somehow be a man in that context?
comment in response to
post
She has become wiser. I think you underestimate the fall from Royalty to scint independent/isolated woman, and the necessary adjustment.
comment in response to
post
He's written her a highly instinctive, spirited aristocrat, excommunicated from the traditional support network, but still a women at sea until she can secure a new stability.
comment in response to
post
But how do you know the consequences at the end of a character's timeline without the relative details of their trauma. How to compare a native American girl with an English society heiress, without the detail? Without it it's assumption
comment in response to
post
The Whitfield stuff is awful, but so is he. The Societal stuff is more balanced in that it represents the era fairly accurately. So the question really isn't about what does it do serve the story line, but do you agree that it is unacceptable? Contextually it is always presented as unacceptable.
comment in response to
post
There is a fair ratio of violence perpetrated by women. The question should be is that ratio justified?
comment in response to
post
But never as a NATO operation. Never organised by NATo