andrewgebert.bsky.social
I am a Tokyo-based researcher, translator, post-carder-to-voters, queer af thirst-trap-ignorer. Proud liberal. Opponent of fascism and racism. Interested in politics, policy and the nexus thereof. substack.com/@andrewgebert
379 posts
1,996 followers
2,784 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I just don’t want one of the untrained, heavily armed fascists working with ICE freaking out and opening fire on a crowd.
comment in response to
post
I totally understand the feeling, but they shouldn’t be throwing stuff at the cars. Strict adherence to non-violence is a must.
comment in response to
post
Dems need to run as the anti-oligarchy party.
comment in response to
post
The NYT’s ‘sophistication’ is going to kill us andour democracy.
comment in response to
post
Same washing at its worst.
comment in response to
post
Don’t forget fucking nuts.
comment in response to
post
Pundit job security = brain death.
comment in response to
post
Ewww!
comment in response to
post
Thank you for asking the right question.
comment in response to
post
He sees only class, and considered race and other forms of identity/experience to be nothing but a kind of “false consciousness.”
comment in response to
post
Amy has the occasional glimmer of integrity.
comment in response to
post
Because, as we know, there’s no greater violation of rights than not being able to say, ignorant, racist, things without being called out for saying ignorant, racist things.
comment in response to
post
Instead being distracted by each new outburst, the media should be identifying these as points on a trajectory of mental decline. They don’t know how to do this because there is no cover-up. No big reveal. It’s all in the open. They just have to state obvious. Again and again.
comment in response to
post
Instead being distracted by each new outburst, the media should be identifying these as points on a trajectory of mental decline. They don’t know how to do this because there is no cover-up. No big reveal. It’s all in the open. They just have to state obvious. Again and again.
comment in response to
post
Instead being distracted by each new outburst, the media should be identifying these as points on a trajectory of mental decline. They don’t know how to do this because there is no cover-up. No big reveal. It’s all in the open. They just have to state obvious. Again and again.
comment in response to
post
No white genocide. But still a tragically violent society. Those are really horrific numbers.
comment in response to
post
Democrats need to repeat this all day long, morning till night, get up next day and do it again.
comment in response to
post
As a Democrat, I want to apologize for thinking that miraculously sheparding significant legislation through Congress while walking and talking unsteadily mattered; or that voters would be put off by energetically recounted tales of electrocuted sharks.
comment in response to
post
As a Democrat, I want to apologize for thinking that miraculously sheparding significant legislation through Congress while walking and talking unsteadily mattered; or that voters would be put off by energetically recounted tales of electrocuted sharks.
comment in response to
post
As a Democrat, I want to apologize for thinking that miraculously sheparding significant legislation through Congress while walking and talking unsteadily mattered; or that voters would be put off by energetically recounted tales of electrocuted sharks.
comment in response to
post
As a Democrat, I want to apologize for thinking that miraculously sheparding significant legislation through Congress while walking and talking unsteadily mattered; or that voters would be put off by energetically recounted tales of electrocuted sharks.
comment in response to
post
As a Democrat, I want to apologize for thinking that miraculously sheparding significant legislation through Congress while walking and talking unsteadily mattered; or that voters would be put off by energetically recounted tales of electrocuted sharks.
comment in response to
post
Awww!
comment in response to
post
The headline is deeply misleading. You can’t suspend habeas corpus just “for migrants.” As we’ve seen, ICE will pick *anyone* up. If you have legal status but no right to habeas corpus, you’ll have no ability to challenge your detention or deportation. Suspension for some is suspension for all.
comment in response to
post
How wonderful!
comment in response to
post
MAGA tears! Delish!
comment in response to
post
Thank you!!
comment in response to
post
Oops!
comment in response to
post
Funny. But they failed to point out that she completely misuses the word “racism.“
comment in response to
post
Thanks
comment in response to
post
And why every trading partner knows that any agreement with him is meaningless.
comment in response to
post
Yes. The legacy media’s failure to distinguish between Biden’s unsteady gait/speech and cognitive decline (there was no evidence Biden’s judgment was wobbly, independent of whether you agreed with it) earned them a lot of mistrust. That, and their consistent sane washing of Trump.
comment in response to
post
Shart of the deal.
comment in response to
post
All this winning is really getting tiresome!
comment in response to
post
Yaas!
comment in response to
post
Intimacy issues.
comment in response to
post
Because he will go on TV and talk about his experience, bringing the reality of what we are doing as a nation into people’s home. This is why fascists need to permanently disappear people: to insulate the compliant, complacent majority from their cruelty.