andrewmgill.bsky.social
BSc (Biology), BEd, Information Security Analyst, lover of games, MTG, science & technology.
54 posts
12 followers
152 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I hope it doesn't pull from the companion app database, that thing is notoriously unreliable!
comment in response to
post
When is the embargo lifted?
comment in response to
post
Fuck off horse ghosts!
comment in response to
post
Sorcery speed has proven to be a deathknell for a lot of removal spells. Probably only playable out of the sideboard and it strikes me as likely just worse than abrade.
comment in response to
post
"Made your opponent attempt to understand layers, they suffered 20 psychic damage."
comment in response to
post
These may as well be the antithesis of boots.
comment in response to
post
Nah, this is one of Commander's many fundamental flaws. Outside of cEDH if you run interaction you and the person you stop from winning will lose.
comment in response to
post
At that point he's gotta pay for the therapy, right?
comment in response to
post
The Art of the Deal is just the scene from Blazing Saddles where Cleavon Little holds himself hostage
comment in response to
post
Yeah? You cheering on Trump, Vance and Musk?
comment in response to
post
Non-americans were found inconsolable.
comment in response to
post
Here's hoping 🤞
comment in response to
post
I've always appreciated your insights and I feel you were able to speak up at key points to right the ship that was Hearthstone but Magic feels like it has way too much inertia to course correct.
comment in response to
post
Furthermore, there is a rather egregious element to this - that people wanting to buy a one off promotional item may be inclined to pay more if they like both brands - but no necessity involved.
Standard as a Magic format now asks "you have to pay, or leave".
Wild captive audience abuse.
comment in response to
post
You can't even get test kits in Canada anymore.
comment in response to
post
This is definitely someone including it without understanding the purpose but still...
comment in response to
post
You don't think expanding the list of playable commanders is fun? I can see arguing that the C20 free spells are net negative but being opposed to higher cost commanders in general seems like a bizarre stance.
comment in response to
post
That's clearly not true, your country elected him twice. You need to face that truth or continue to fail in your efforts to resist.
comment in response to
post
Do any "win on upkeep" style cards see play play in cEDH? I wouldn't think so.
comment in response to
post
Unfortunately, this will only grant your creatures untargettability, you are still fair game.
comment in response to
post
If it means traveling to the US I'm out.
comment in response to
post
Oh THIS is what fast fashion is, I get it now.
comment in response to
post
WOTC literally tried to end their own lore to make way for UB. Anyone cheering for the fortnitification of any property is no friend of mine.
comment in response to
post
Popeye's love interest
comment in response to
post
Gotta have a reason to run the artifact pod :P
comment in response to
post
Silly in what sense?
comment in response to
post
We're back to printing vanillas are we?
comment in response to
post
duniaku.idntimes.com/geek/mainan/...
comment in response to
post
I know this is Magali and they can do no wrong but it does make me curious what WOTC tells their contracted artists about character consistency. Does it just say Nissa = verdant?
comment in response to
post
That will do absolutely nothing to the data Google collected when you performed a search using their services.