Profile avatar
anewperspective.bsky.social
// darkest days // brightest future // 🏳️‍🌈🇵🇸 // Democracy only dies if we let it Midwestern Gay™ in NorCal Policy Wonk (sustainability + resilience, climate change mitigation, urban planning) in a world that hates policy and loves politics he/they
1,090 posts 2,317 followers 3,405 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
And then voted to gut FEMA?
comment in response to post
So he did the bare minimum a federal elected official should do?
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Rather than just racism, I’d say bigotry overall is our second sin.
comment in response to post
I believe we’ll have much more progressive candidates in this race, and I hope with every fiber of my being, that one of them wins. We need a true progressive leader with a backbone to lead the most powerful state in the union—hopefully to lead it OUT of this union.
comment in response to post
I begrudgingly voted for her for President, because she was the best option with the highest likelihood of beating Trump. But her track record in the progressive landscape is atrocious, she facilitated a genocide in Gaza, and therefore she won’t be getting my vote for governor of CA.
comment in response to post
What exactly did he do while he was working “really hard for folks out there after the storm”?
comment in response to post
This should apply to members of Congress as well.
comment in response to post
They choose to be cops because it allows them to violently subjugate other people, and you can’t convince me otherwise because if it weren’t the case, our system of policing would be much less hostile to the people it’s supposedly meant to protect. 2/2
comment in response to post
Oh, really? Because it looks like even when you take the time to reply, you don’t answer the simple question that was asked of you.
comment in response to post
He’s a pathetic little man, and the cowards in Congress are no better. I can only assume that the Republicans in Congress are afraid of standing up to him. But imagine being afraid of this sickly man baby who throws tantrums when people call out his own actions. It’s all just sad to watch.
comment in response to post
Pretty sure you are Odette. Common MAGA account switching tactic to attempt to overwhelm someone you’re losing a debate against. Congrats on being no better than the worst of our populous.
comment in response to post
“Empathy free” as you support people who continuously fund genocide, and refuse to do anything to help the most disadvantaged people in their own country? I can vote for Dems AND criticize them and their policies. That’s called not being a blind follower along party lines.Blue MAGA isn’t a good look
comment in response to post
Yes, because the Dems never even attempted to codify gay marriage and Trump’s Supreme Court, which has been in place since his first term, would gladly overrule Obergefell.
comment in response to post
Supreme Court decisions ≠ codified laws passed by Congress
comment in response to post
And frankly, if you think the current Democratic Party is successful at legislating FOR THE PEOPLE, you shouldn’t have a say in who gets to be a legislator at all. They all suck. Kamala literally ran on the expansion of the police state, mass deportation, and defending Isreal’s fascism.
comment in response to post
Explain why people would vote for abortion rights and Trump on the same ballot.
comment in response to post
What generation would that be, exactly? Or are you just making assumptions?
comment in response to post
Abortion rights were voted into law in deeply red states. Every single state that had abortion rights on the ballot in November passed the initiative. If M4A was somehow included as a national ballot initiative I pretty much guarantee it would pass. Which is why Congress should codify it.
comment in response to post
Ah, yes, look at all the things Dems do at the state level that they have yet to even TRY to do nationally. We have yet to codify same-sex marriage. We have yet to codify abortion rights. We have yet to codify gay rights overall. You’re not helping your case.
comment in response to post
They may have had more access to medical assistance, but the ACA did nothing to reduce medical cost. It forced people into a capitalistic nightmare of a health insurance system and didn’t create universal care. It didn’t prevent medical bankruptcy. It didn’t prevent medical costs from skyrocketing.
comment in response to post
I have repeatedly stated that I voted for Kamala. I’m tired of y’all ignoring that fact just because I’m not moronic enough to blindly support them wholeheartedly despite the fact that they do absolutely nothing to change the material reality of our lives.
comment in response to post
Voters are enthusiastic about Medicare for All, as evidenced by this poll right here that says 6 in 10 Americans support it:
comment in response to post
You were responding to my post about the VRA, another policy I hadn’t mentioned until you did.
comment in response to post
And yet, I keep voting for them, which also ruins your entire argument against what I’m saying. I understand that they’re the best we have, and yet they accomplish next to nothing to improve the lives of the average American.
comment in response to post
That’s not by my own personal definition. By global standards, anything aside from universal single-payer health insurance is RIGHT of center. And did you not read the fact that the ACA was originally a Republican policy proposal? lmao, dude, you’re not gonna win this debate. The Dems don’t do shit.
comment in response to post
I wasn’t talking about the ACA. The ACA is not a progressive policy by any measure. The ACA is centrist at best, and was originally proposed by the Republican Party.
comment in response to post
People have been going into medical bankruptcy the entire time the ACA has existed, and having the “right” to go into medical debt despite having insurance is hardly “saving lives”.
comment in response to post
If your only example of the Dems actually achieving a progressive policy is from nearly 6 DECADES ago, then you don’t even have an argument.
comment in response to post
And, again, if Kamala actually did win and Trump cheated his way into the WH, then yes. The country DID vote for abortion rights nationally. And every single state that had abortion rights on the ballot in November DID vote for it.
comment in response to post
When was the last time universal healthcare was a ballot initiative in a red state? I’m not cherry picking, I’m giving you an example of how people vote when given the opportunity to directly vote on progressive policies.
comment in response to post
I didn’t mention the VRA, which was passed nearly 60 years ago and is not being protected by the currently sitting Dems.