aoleks.bsky.social
632 posts
232 followers
107 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Not blaming the woman or the EU, but stop sending people, diplomats or not, to countries without human rights! It’s not safe and there’s no place for diplomacy there. Send rockets, bombs, drones!
comment in response to
post
So is most of the media, they go hand in hand!
comment in response to
post
It’s not pointy enough.
comment in response to
post
Those papers falling before the ink dries is suggestive of what will happen very shortly: he’ll renege on this deal! Not to be this trusted, this incompetent baboon.
comment in response to
post
Yes. And a USB X cable with 3ft of RAM!
comment in response to
post
Shit is burning like fuck!
comment in response to
post
Nt to mention how they treat the Iranian people, some of the nicest people I’ve ever met. Humble, educated, wishing for a normal life!
comment in response to
post
Not every built up areas are the same. Residential area bear a school? High street? Fine, 20 is plenty…
Dual carriage way in the middle of an industrial terrain? 50-60 please.
comment in response to
post
The people of Iran yes. The current “government” is a cancer and needs to be removed through any means.
comment in response to
post
And many others 😁
comment in response to
post
I haven’t seen that kind of buses since 1973..
comment in response to
post
I just checked and it is indeed!
comment in response to
post
There’s an iron dome, right?
comment in response to
post
Nooooo, not thousands of EV chargers. There’s millions of cars on the road.
comment in response to
post
I wouldn’t mind seeing the primitive regime in Iran completely annihilated, no matter by who. Those fucking retards have nothing on the Iranian people, so they need bombing into oblivion.
comment in response to
post
That’s what happens when you store highly radioactive matter in a shed :-)
comment in response to
post
Ok, this one is tricky. If I’m in my car, minding my own business and the kids or my wife are in the car and I end up in a protest, if one of you motherfuckers start putting my life in danger, I’ll floor it.
No cause is worth seeing my children anxious and terrified for their lives.
comment in response to
post
Another SUV… sighs
comment in response to
post
Airbus really did it, they’re on a spree lately. Extremely reliable planes, spotless safety record.
comment in response to
post
True, but the first seconds after take-off are crucial. You can’t really take off with one engine.
comment in response to
post
This right here. The man has shown an amount of integrity you would only find in books.
comment in response to
post
737, not 757. Capital injection from the us gov, that’s how.
comment in response to
post
And you think the same drivers won’t exceed the 20mph limit, just because it’s a different number?
I’m all for traffic safety, but a dual carriage way with fences on both sides and no buildings/pavements shouldn’t be 20 or 30mph. Sometimes too slow is too slow.
comment in response to
post
That’s not what happened, calm down.
comment in response to
post
Ok. Now let’s have a 4mph speed limit, that will further reduce things. Must be good, right?
But that aside, the problem is not the 20mph limit. It’s a 20mph limit in places where you could clearly go 30 or 40mph.
comment in response to
post
Great solution 😁
comment in response to
post
Having ID and being made to carry it around all the time are two very different things.
comment in response to
post
And why not?
comment in response to
post
No. To a pensioner with no housing costs, a possible second property and around £2000/month, I do…
comment in response to
post
The court is NOT the government and the government has absolutely no influence on those decisions. So your though that somehow labour is responsible is misplaced.
Also, the ruling didn’t do that much in terms of lgbt rights, it’s just providing consistency on the definition of a woman.
comment in response to
post
Absolutely make her pay and claw the money back, she’s got plenty. Fucking unscrupulous thieves, thinking they can get away on technicalities…
comment in response to
post
Hotel California vibes…
comment in response to
post
Yes, except one of the things you mentioned is demonstrably false. Labour did nothing to change LGBT rights.
comment in response to
post
What data? They already have it… name, address, date of birth, nhs number, nino number, driving licence details, household composition, earnings, medical history etc.
What exactly are you afraid of? What will an ID card reveal about you that’s not already known to the government?
comment in response to
post
Nothing changed to LGBT rights. Benefit cuts Imm not a big fan of, fair enough. Pensioners have just hit jackpot following the u turn and “destroying the green belt” is a but rich in a country that’s barely built. Not every patch of weeds deserves protection.
comment in response to
post
And yet, if you take a step back and a deep breath AND bother to find some factual info about what labour has done so far, you will see positive signs.
comment in response to
post
LA, Austin, New York…
The rest will start soon, it’s inevitable.
comment in response to
post
BRO!!! Just cut my hair!!!
comment in response to
post
No, it won’t get “destroyed”. A small chunk of it will become a nuclear power plant, that’s all.
comment in response to
post
UK, why are you so terrified of ID cards? What have they done to you? Where does it hurt?
Honestly, pathetic at this point. It’s literally a card with some personal details on it, just like your driving licence card, your nino card, but combined.
comment in response to
post
That’s how politics is. Are you really wasting energy trying to “understand”? What matters is the final outcome, not what was (not) said.
comment in response to
post
Better a puppet than a muppet like you.
comment in response to
post
Generous winter fuel payments, above inflation pay rises for public sector workers, investments in nuclear, increased minimum wage, triple lock on pensions, workers rights, NHS funding…
I’m optimistic. I always said I’d give them at least 5 years, otherwise it’s not fair.
comment in response to
post
For those not close to the matter, what’s the implication here? Pam Bondi is still AG, what difference will this make?
comment in response to
post
Not that stretch. It’s not built on the white cliffs. I’m sure people have done their geological surveys before deciding to spend tens of billions on a nuclear plant.
comment in response to
post
We’re not japan, a tsunami is not possible here. Those surges are easily mitigated for.
comment in response to
post
The debt is not something you’d take over. Company goes bust, debt gets written off, you start from scratch. Even then, less than £20 billion over a few generations is nothing.
Anyway, stop arguing for the current model, it doesn’t work.
comment in response to
post
Yes, but there’s no real alternative. Borrowing a few billion now to save literally every future generation from these criminals is not a bad deal, however you look at it.
comment in response to
post
What exactly do you owe the stakeholders of a failed (bankrupt) company? If I invest in company A and company A fails tomorrow, I can kiss my investment goodbye. Same here!