Profile avatar
arminreindl.bsky.social
Artist, crocodile enthusiast, wikipedia editor tags: #SciArt
270 posts 3,179 followers 394 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Not like I have been fairing much better of late, trying to keep up with my work on Wikipedia is quite time consuming
comment in response to post
I was just hit by the fact that this meme is around 6 years old at this point
comment in response to post
Photos by Shivang Mehta, couldn't fit that in the message above
comment in response to post
Theres an interesting etymological web going on. Like I mentioned the term ghadiala apparently derives from ghara, which is the name of the soft tissue structure seen in adult male gharials named after a type of pot. But obviously the ghara is also the root for the term gharial as a whole #gharial
comment in response to post
the particular specimen of Rhamphosuchus that preserves the palate isn't actually Rhamphosuchus Head also draws parallels to "Gavialis" breviceps, which funny enough has been included under Rhamphosuchus pachyrhynchus by Courville et al. earlier this year
comment in response to post
tl,dr Jason Head notes that the Potwar Skull is not as elongated as whats suggested by material of Rhamphosuchus crassidens, he also notes that the exposure of the vomer differs between crassidens and the Potwar skull, which either suggests different affinities or...
comment in response to post
This all definitely needs a lot more study, especially with the recent description of Rhamphosuchus pachyrhynchus, which is of course not something taken into account by the claim that the Potwar skull is distinct from Ramphosuchus not to mention the mess that is Rhamphosuchus in general
comment in response to post
I'm obviously aware that Rhamphosuchus has been a mess in the past 20 years since the abstract, so I'm not hedging my bets on it, but given how often its cited by other studies I wonder if theres more than just well that
comment in response to post
Size estimates suggest a length of 6 to 7 meters, so a little larger than modern gharials, which can get quite massive in their own right.
comment in response to post
and the fact that they would have interlocked (which does however separate it from Rhamphosuchus, which had an overbite with teeth facing straight down so to say). The eyes have upturned rims, but they are not as telescoped as in Gavialis, which is one of the reasons it was placed in its own genus.
comment in response to post
tho the same paper did also establish a new species of Rhamphosuchus, R. pachyrhynchus, previously also called "Gharialis" at the time Overall, the anatomy of Pseudogavialis is interesting but not too surprising, as it resembles Gavialis in many aspects like the splayed, likely very fine teeth
comment in response to post
In 2019 there was a brief overview over Siwalik/Bugti gavialoids published that argued that "Gharialis" curvirostris might either be its own taxon or a synonym of Rhamphosuchus this new paper went with the former, finding it to have been very similar to modern gharials and possibly the sister genus
comment in response to post
I feel like I remember picking up a paperback version of this back in 2006? Still have it on my shelf.
comment in response to post
time and research will tell I suppose, tho I must admitt that this conclusion does play quite nicely into some of the issues with Diplocynodon it's definitely a big shift from prior work tho, given how ingrained the alligatoroid interpretation has been so far
comment in response to post
Very rewarding for me personally is the fact that I managed to spot four of my silhouettes used in the phylogenetic tree. My Purussaurus neivensis, my old Gryposuchus pachakamue, my generic Paleosuchus and even an old, somewhat dated Mourasuchus.
comment in response to post
I so desperately want them to do away with the "African species" nonsense they introduced it was fun enough in Bloodlines but quickly overstayed its welcome (as did most other stuff about the new trilogy)
comment in response to post
Swamp Ape Science on twitter has mentioned that some of the people down where this was shot suspect that this was a case of an unaware gator accidentally getting too close to a defensive nesting crocodile mother, hence the posturing of the croc and the rather relaxed attitude of the gator
comment in response to post
added the video to my personal folder the moment it got posted online and its been in the back of my mind ever since the highwalking on the American crocodile still impresses me with every rewatch
comment in response to post
Also on a personal note, I should probably consider making a silhouette of a mahajangasuchid and putting it up on Phylopic given that the authors ended up using my Quinkana, presumably because it sort of fit the overall mood of that particular group in the absence of illustrations of the real thing
comment in response to post
For anyone who wants to have a read for themselves royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...
comment in response to post
In terms of anatomy, Tewkensuchus is unique in that its postorbital bones are inclined in a way that puts them higher than the rest of the skull table as seen in my quick mock up of the papers figure below
comment in response to post
that the survivors were small like Ogresuchus (art by ArtbyJRC) and simply grew rapidly after the dinosaurs were gone. Personally the second option seems a bit more probable, tho I have to admitt if you subscribe ot the Sebecia hypothesis than option 1 isn't unreasonable either.
comment in response to post
The authors suggests that sebecoids in general were in the 300 to 400 kilo range when the asteroid struck, which obviously would raise a few problems. Of course they also suggest alternate explanations like an ancestral semi-aquatic lifestyle followed by terrestrial radiations or...
comment in response to post
Size is also interesting. Based on the frontal they estimate a skull length of 520 cm and through that a weight of 300 kilos. Larger than any baurusuchid and enormous given it lived just 3 million years after the mass extinction, even if some later sebecoids would outsize it still.