Profile avatar
askmarkward.bsky.social
ProvocateuršŸ”¹Life StrategistšŸ”¹PodcasteršŸ”¹Progressive DemocratšŸ”¹Pop Culture EnthusiastšŸ”¹BravoholicšŸ”¹ Dog loveršŸ”¹ChicagoanšŸ”¹He/Him/His šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡øšŸ³ļøā€šŸŒˆ
70 posts 92 followers 324 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
It seems to be a weak response, but THANK YOU.
comment in response to post
Poor Elon. He lost all of that ā€œlunch moneyā€ for nothing.
comment in response to post
The Democrats should just a dinner on the same evening and have Amber do her set.
comment in response to post
I appreciate that. Trust me, we’re sorry too!
comment in response to post
To be clear, the orange yank & his cultists did this—not the sane ones down here. We’re on your side!
comment in response to post
Thank you, Senator.
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
Thank you! We apparently only have a handful of you in Congress that are actually looking out for us. You are a true leader.
comment in response to post
You have proven YET AGAIN that the leadership of the Democratic Party are weak, spineless & no longer deserving of our support. And you wonder why you lost. Keep spinning it. We won’t forget (we won’t be allowed to).
comment in response to post
Bless their hearts. Most of the Democratic Party leaders and representatives are still pretending that it is just a matter of philosophical difference and contrasting legislative ideas. They think that scolding tweets, MSNBC interviews & incessant donation solicitation emails will save us. šŸ™„
comment in response to post
Let’s tell Trump, Elon, Vance and Mike Johnson that they are loved, adored & highly celebrated in the Congo. They’ve been invited to a special event where they will be honored….
comment in response to post
This is what they should have done…
comment in response to post
That’s what I’m talking about! Good for Bernie!
comment in response to post
His memory of any what it used to be. He left that out! šŸ˜‰
comment in response to post
How we got here is relevant for the next elections, but we’re here. There is always a board that you’re playing on. When someone changes the board, and you remain in the game, you have to play the one that you’re on.
comment in response to post
Exactly.
comment in response to post
OK. To you, I come off as ā€œweak.ā€ Got it. You think that it’s whining. Got it. My opinion remains unchanged.
comment in response to post
I am not failing to notice anything. I have a different opinion on what is required to mobilize. This is not up for debate. It’s my opinion. It doesn’t have to be yours. As for pressuring in swing districts, absolutely.
comment in response to post
Again, we all have our opinions. I am expressing mine. I am not here to change yours.
comment in response to post
She knows how to engage, speak in a way that many can hear and inspire confidence. She continues to engage and inform. Not inaction buried in rhetoric.
comment in response to post
First of all, no one is yelling. Second, ā€œconstructiveā€ like your response? Kettle, meet black. We can disagree. Notice I don’t feel compelled to call you a derogatory name because you have a different opinion. Notice how that works?
comment in response to post
We can agree to disagree. In my view, Jeffries & Schumer are playing the game on a board that no longer exists. Weak.
comment in response to post
I’m guessing that you think that leading means writing ā€œharsh statementsā€ and speaking on MSNBC. I was thrilled when you were appointed to leadership. You have proven to be a giant disappointment. We need someone w/real courage like @aoc.bsky.social or @jasmineforus.bsky.social
comment in response to post
comment in response to post