bealljs.bsky.social
Husband, father, labor union benefits lawyer, history junkie
223 posts
95 followers
189 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
Thank you for staying in the game, Conor!
comment in response to
post
It’s all just a big f*cking joke to Trump and his minions.
comment in response to
post
How about resurrecting those who already have died because he was settling a score with an agency that undermined apartheid?
comment in response to
post
It is always better to die on your feet than live on your knees.
comment in response to
post
I wish someone could hijack her feed, which she would read verbatim a la Anchorman
comment in response to
post
Is cryptodice a thing yet?
comment in response to
post
There is something really wrong with this guy. Just sayin
comment in response to
post
Could this trigger an American Iliad? Where is the popcorn
comment in response to
post
I mean, if Stephen Miller and Elon Musk are the notches on your belt, uh, wut?
comment in response to
post
Lying down staring into space is how I have gotten through the last 4 months
comment in response to
post
Same guy who said don’t take medical advice from me. Gee, thanks
comment in response to
post
Why can’t others see it? She runs a G-D clinic, and for free
comment in response to
post
It’s across the street from the street from the Department of Silly Walks, right?
comment in response to
post
Are spine implants covered by Hill insurance?
comment in response to
post
Uranus! What a great idea! Can some other billionaire bros join him there? They have wreaked enough havoc here, thank you very much
comment in response to
post
That’s right, Chris. And we got some good TACO trades out of it, too
comment in response to
post
You are G-D right! I mean, China is going to pay the tariffs, so they should fly through
comment in response to
post
Another entry in the “no sh*t” file. When has privatizing public goods EVER worked?
comment in response to
post
Not sure your trade expert knows much about the current Supreme Court
comment in response to
post
The Spanish-Austrian Hapsburgs?
comment in response to
post
This guy has rocks for brains. I have a lot of friends in Alabama, and this guy will screw all of them. The Senate IQ average will jump dramatically though. So there’s that.
comment in response to
post
I am all for Mars exploration. But that’s it. We have one home, and we had better not wreck it for ourselves. It will get along just fine without US, though, as it did for most of its existence.
comment in response to
post
Yes, what the hell happened to her?
comment in response to
post
Like Trump she just will not go away, will she?
comment in response to
post
It is an expanded version of The Changeling, one of the best TOS episodes. I am of the school that believes stories in the western tradition are retellings of The Iliad and The Odyssey. ST TMP favors the latter.
comment in response to
post
Roger that. Still lawful, for now, to organize by striking and to win contracts by striking.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, adding more adjectives does not distinguish anything from anything else. Nice try though.
comment in response to
post
FAFO, example 1
comment in response to
post
OMG, when is the last time anybody gave a flying f*ck what Peggy Noonan thought? Carl has to pass this kind of stuff along, I know, but I am getting too old for this.
comment in response to
post
No sh*t!
comment in response to
post
It is staring them right in the face, g*d-damnit!
comment in response to
post
It’s the legal writing form of social media algorithms - reinforce the insanity to make it look “mainstream”
comment in response to
post
Agree 100% with Ken. Now those bozos and others can cite his dissent as “authority” for more nonsense.
comment in response to
post
Jizzing up stuff is the GOP’s speciality. Great to hear this the same week they are pushing an anti-porn bill
comment in response to
post
War crimes, schmar crimes!
comment in response to
post
Afraid this is exactly how our “system” is SUPPOSED to work, so long as the Supreme Court says money is speech (as it has since 1976) and the voters do nothing about it.
comment in response to
post
All love starts with self-love, right?
comment in response to
post
This guy cracks me up. The last time he was near a principle it was the other kind in school.
comment in response to
post
For at least another 5 seconds
comment in response to
post
Exactly. Apparently the road to the Kingdom of God is paved with dead people.
comment in response to
post
Thank you for the updates, Lee. These guys can seriously go f*** themselves.
comment in response to
post
Well, at least somebody is having some fun here. Good for her!
comment in response to
post
We really do have to discipline ourselves - AS A PEOPLE - to STFU and ask for lawyer whenever we are approached by law enforcement. It’s Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy now, and we’re on the OTHER side of the Iron Curtain.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, there is something really wrong with Congresswoman Mace. I said elsewhere before that this will not end well, and I am still of that opinion.
comment in response to
post
But great reporting, Don!
comment in response to
post
G*d-damn the Supreme Court for holding money is speech in 1976’s Buckley v Valeo.
comment in response to
post
Congressional equities ARE at stake and will be handed over by Johnson and Thune as fast as you can say “primary”.
comment in response to
post
Didn’t Lenin say we would sell the communists the role they would use to hang us? Then I guess we just cut out the middle man…
comment in response to
post
How about “Life-ending moments for Trump opponents raise concerns”
comment in response to
post
I agree. What Ken is calling himself now is the first thing I check every morning.