beaq.bsky.social
Mon Mothma didn't get rid of private health insurance
1,006 posts
255 followers
240 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Uh huh.
comment in response to
post
Okay, a moron.
comment in response to
post
You argue that child prisoners are lying criminals by linking to an article about a state rep touring a Florida detention center for men without talking to any prisoners and declaring it fine.
You're either a bot or a moron.
comment in response to
post
Child "criminals"
comment in response to
post
Long after their actions might have any impact or be controversial in the least. Kinda like how conservatives hold up MLK as a respectable sort of rebel.
comment in response to
post
Guess you should keep shoving that bean up your nose until it holds itself in.
comment in response to
post
Let you in on a little secret: they are not being treated great.
comment in response to
post
Kay.
comment in response to
post
(In the non-clinical sense)
comment in response to
post
I see what you mean. Voting is not pointless in principle but is not sufficient when dealing with sociopathic cheats.
comment in response to
post
At least it's a good story
comment in response to
post
What are you advocating?
comment in response to
post
I think I understand you to be saying that it gives the prez leeway to do much damage short of literally declaring war, in which case I agree. It is not a good law. It made certain limits explicit but legitimized a lot of Nixon's criminal mischief.
comment in response to
post
Moreover, it positions disabled folks use of AI as a shield against criticism of AI, even when most deployments of AI are highly problematic for disabled folks. This is why we need to be cautious with these claims.
comment in response to
post
It's preliminary posturing to rassle up an impeachment.
comment in response to
post
No shade on cattle, who are relatively sensible creatures
comment in response to
post
It's been unconstitutional the whole time, and yet.
comment in response to
post
What part of the War Powers Act *extends* the President's unilateral authority rather than, as the act was intended to do, reaffirms its limits?
comment in response to
post
Plus rampaging kids, 24 hour delays... the issue being zero infrastructure dedicated exclusively to passenger rail.
comment in response to
post
Wellllllll it's still a pretty ride
comment in response to
post
Oof
comment in response to
post
I don't think a requirement for public officials to ID when they assault people is tantamount to a mask ban.
comment in response to
post
There have been allegations of an incentive program for border patrol
comment in response to
post
Idgaf if every person they're arresting turns out to be terrorist serial killers out to topple the West. Without due process, every action they take is open fascism. America is no longer on the road to fascist autocracy. You're already there, and it's just taking people a bit too long to realize it
comment in response to
post
Anyone who says that masked thugs without identification making warrantless "arrests" of people that are little more than black bagging people off the street for no crime isn't fascism don't know what the fuck fascism is, because that's like... Fascism 101 shit.
comment in response to
post
I think the most distressing and most likely answer is that these guys are just what ICE has been all along and we’re just waking up to it now when we see them in our cities instead of deep in south Texas border towns.
comment in response to
post
It’s reminiscent of the KKK using obscure horse police laws to deputize themselves and terrorize people
comment in response to
post
One of my friends can confirm she saw Oath Keepers tats on an agent's arms during an arrest she was privy to.
ICE has white supremacists in its staff, and were likely pardoned for J6.
We need some bold legal experts out there to prove it 100%.
comment in response to
post
You can save some thanks for everyone who voted to create "Homeland Security" in the first place.
comment in response to
post
This is JD Vance's alt acct
comment in response to
post
Did you mean something else, "pablo"?
comment in response to
post
I should remember that usually means a bot.
comment in response to
post
You sound like a fuckwit.