Profile avatar
beeboppin.bsky.social
I’m just sitting here watching the wheels go ‘round and ‘round. I really love to watch them roll. No more riding on the merry-go-round. I just had to let it go.
85 posts 18 followers 5 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to post
No one knows whether this is legal or illegal: www.democracydocket.com/analysis/the...
comment in response to post
Why are you here then? You’ve clearly, though wrongly, decided I’m a “MAGAt” unworthy of your time.
comment in response to post
Free speech has nothing to do with the toxic manner of people on social media. You are again proving my point.
comment in response to post
Thank you for proving my point.
comment in response to post
You’re right. I’m wrong. Now shoo.
comment in response to post
It’s a shame you haven’t bothered to visit the real world in some time if ever.
comment in response to post
Our educational system is a disgrace as you’re currently proving.
comment in response to post
You could also die fighting for your freedom. Either way the result is the same. Are you always prone to irrational hysteria?
comment in response to post
Repeating the same statement over and again does not make it true. It also does nothing to illuminate an intelligence you obviously lack.
comment in response to post
I can’t even with you. The purpose of The Declaration of Independence was to announce and explain separation from Great Britain to King George III. It is not part of The Constitution. It does not grant citizens the right to oppose The US Government as Jan 6 rioters found out. Stop this nonsense.
comment in response to post
Not really. But do go on.
comment in response to post
This is not a legally binding document. It is a letter to the King of England. Doing that today and using this as a defense, as the right attempted on Jan. 6, is illegal.
comment in response to post
Inconsistency? Hypocrisy.
comment in response to post
I hate to point out the obvious, but you’re paying him attention.
comment in response to post
BlueSky is an echo chamber for those without facts or original thoughts to coddle one another’s egos. I prefer to disrupt those activities rather than be liked. You are still ill informed, and now we can add rude as well. Maybe you should read something other than social media to become informed.
comment in response to post
You definitely are ill informed.
comment in response to post
I had moved on. Then Fauci reared his head and repeated past transgressions. What is wrong with you?
comment in response to post
You are incredibly ill informed.
comment in response to post
Believing Fauci is innocent or beyond prosecution is naive. This man is responsible for murdering gay men during the AIDS epidemic by withholding life saving meds. These are the same tactics he used during the COVID pandemic. He needs to answer for these actions and be held accountable.
comment in response to post
People are not free from criticism of their actions. The policy does not mention anything about Trump or his people. Up until a few years ago, gender dysphoria was listed as a mental illness in the DSM. It was only delisted as one because of political pressure.
comment in response to post
You are free to say and be what you want. You are not free from criticism for those things. This is the way free speech has always worked up until a decade ago when certain groups decided to bully the rest of the world into silence. The policy says nothing about criticizing Trump or his people.
comment in response to post
I’m blocked as well. That’s the way of BlueSky. Anyone who isn’t screaming into the echo chamber, or anyone who engages the trolls (that’s me) is eliminated from the “conversation” if you can call it that.
comment in response to post
Yes. I read that you had a porn banner that you tried to get removed but were unsuccessful. Then you speculated about protections for children on that site. My point was children shouldn’t be on social media sites. There are age restrictions. That is the protection offered to children.
comment in response to post
Why are your children on Facebook?
comment in response to post
@srb65.bsky.social Here’s a specific example of the toxicity on BlueSky. Do you agree with this behavior? Should it be censored?
comment in response to post
This is complete misinformation.
comment in response to post
You misread the policy or failed to comprehend what you did read. Reread the policy.
comment in response to post
You have just spread misinformation. Ivermectin has many uses and applications—so many that it won the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. There is scientific evidence to show Ivermectin is an inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2. Your facts concerning this drug appear to be politically biased.
comment in response to post
Who is this “they?” And yes, using AI and Bots is still free speech albeit en masse. Controlling speech is a slippery slope into fascism. www.nyu.edu/about/news-p...
comment in response to post
I am not deflecting.
comment in response to post
What do you call it when one group attempts to control the narrative and actions of others by use of threat or loss of privileges?
comment in response to post
I’m afraid you already bought that bridge. It’s yours now. You’re stuck with it.
comment in response to post
My response was specific.
comment in response to post
No.
comment in response to post
By your logic, Bluesky can also be described as “a toxic product.” Because you’re okay with this brand of toxicity doesn’t mean it’s okay. Also by your logic, no social media or social constructs should exist since all have the propensity for violence.
comment in response to post
Yes. There are good jobs at McDonalds especially higher up the chain.
comment in response to post
Did you actually imply that only white people are capable and qualified to work at McDonalds? That minority groups are too unskilled to secure a job there?
comment in response to post
No. You have appropriately named yourself “nutcase.”
comment in response to post
Free speech is literally the most important right in any democracy. You’re advocating fascism.
comment in response to post
Does that go for both sides?
comment in response to post
Why are your children on Insta? What kind of a parent are you?
comment in response to post
It’s ironic that the same people screaming about right wing fascism are fascist.
comment in response to post
That’s “your estimation.” You can’t force everyone to think the way you do. Once you get over that arrogant thinking, you’ll be able to formulate a decent persuasive argument. Critical thinkers know nearly all politicians share “his moral failings.” Stop virtue signaling. The DNC is no better.
comment in response to post
The issue is the Democratic Party’s insistence on ignoring blue-collar workers. That’s it. That’s all. If they ever decide to fight for the working class again, the people will return to The Party.
comment in response to post
Harris failed to get her message across to voters. Maybe a few more years of public speaking will help. She’s not a good at it, and it shows in the vote numbers.
comment in response to post
People felt they were better off when Trump was in office. Harris failed to articulate her policy. That’s on her.
comment in response to post
I’m not interested in a pi$$ing match. They’re both awful. The difference is, for whatever reason, people were familiar with the economic experiences of both the Biden and Trump Presidencies. They felt they were better off under Trump. Harris needed something different and failed to deliver.
comment in response to post
This issue is there is too much propaganda on both the left and the right. Get oligarchs and monopolies out of our media.
comment in response to post
Keep telling yourself that while ignoring real issues and lose more elections in the future. This election was about the economy—the income disparity gap, inflation, and stagnant wages. Harris didn’t deliver a coherent economic message in a time when people are hurting.
comment in response to post
I agree. I kept waiting for a coherent economic policy, but she never verbalized it. What she did verbalize came out sounding like gibberish.