berdyaev.bsky.social
Prebyterian minister, housewife, student and procrastinator (obviously)
305 posts
19 followers
36 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Besides, the Bible tells us that we should leave the reckoning, the vengeance to God. He does it best. The mills of God's judgment sometimes grind slowly but exceedingly fine.
comment in response to
post
Who said it did?
comment in response to
post
So, there were 700 deaths reported to VAERS in the first month after rollout. There were 70 deaths from the swine flu vaccine and that vaccine was pulled.
comment in response to
post
So, the Nature study had no deaths. The Nature study of 2023 may indicate the mechanism, or a mechanism behind the harms and sadly, even deaths. What we so there was that the base of the mRNA jab was causing "slippage" (what a word) with the result of immune flare ups in about 1/3 of the cohort.
comment in response to
post
No, I never said that. The Nature study shows that 25-30% of the cohort had an immune flareup because of "slippage" (what a word) but anyway, that is why they are changing the base on the mRNA therapies. The 17 million deaths worldwide is another study...of course.
comment in response to
post
No, I never said that. The Nature study shows that 25-30% of the cohort had an immune flareup because of "slippage" (what a word) but anyway, that is why they are changing the base on the mRNA therapies. The 17 million deaths worldwide is another study...of course.
comment in response to
post
mRNA is a genius idea but it's not appropriate for a vaccine against a virus. I am not saying it can't be used in cancer therapy of course. Further, the pseudouridine was obviously a mistake.
comment in response to
post
No, I was referencing the Pfizer safety studies.
comment in response to
post
Let's just consider the Nature study, that study has rightly rung alarm bells. It's a good thing that pseudouridine will no longer be the base but it is a bad thing that it was used in the mRNA jab against covid.
comment in response to
post
I meant, "if one wants to lean out of one's silo"
comment in response to
post
Unfortunately, most people in America have seen the harms of the mRNA jabs.
comment in response to
post
That response does not deserve my attention.
comment in response to
post
I should say this is a bit hard to listen to. Those on the right (sorry) tend to attack one another. However, it's educates me about the right and it's educational in general.
comment in response to
post
Theology is the queen of sciences.
comment in response to
post
No, they show that the risk for young people from myocarditis is increased by a factor of 4. Moreover, 700 deaths in the first month from the mRNA vaccines. 70 from the swine flu vaccine and that vaccine was pulled.
comment in response to
post
So, let's go back to the beginning. 700 deaths from mRNA jabs in the first month. 70 deaths from the swine flu vaccine and it was pulled. We need to ban the mRNA jabs.
comment in response to
post
Again, there were 700 deaths because of the mRNA jabs. The swine flu vaccine was pulled for 70.
comment in response to
post
That's an hypothesis but I can tell you it's wrong. It's not bad to be lonely though so if you perhaps are lonely that's okay! Don't be ashamed. The reason I am responding is because I have seen the harm of the mRNA jabs. It changed the lives forever of people near to me.
comment in response to
post
The science doesn't show that mRNA jabs are safe and effective. The only thing we need to do as a country now is be up front about it and publicly admit what everyone knows anyhow.
comment in response to
post
I believe it is God who kills and makes alive. I am just a waitress.
comment in response to
post
Actually, it is, sadly, the leadership of the Palestinians who have refused to grant any land to the State of Israel. Also, your numbers are completely off. Actually, Israel has a 1:1 militant to civilian casualty rate. That is exceedingly precise.
comment in response to
post
It might perhaps be better to look at the summation in the Telegraph article. There you will see that what was concerning to researchers was the 25-30% of the cohort who had an immune system flare-up. And we know why. It was the pseudouridine base that produced this "slippage." We need to do better.
comment in response to
post
No, I think the Nature study alone is concerning when it comes to the mRNA jabs administered to millions. The other concerning aspect is simply the safety signal. It's good that many European countries have come out against them but we need to do likewise publicly in the US.
comment in response to
post
The DNA aspect is not my bailiwick. Not that I am denying or negating the concerns of some Japanese researchers. My concern is now with what the Nature study found out about the mRNA jabs. The good news is that will change the base, the bad news is that it was ever administered to millions.
comment in response to
post
Well, sadly, there seems to be a strong temporal association between C19 vaccine rollouts and excess all-cause mortality and it also seems that the deaths that seem to have been caused by the mRNA jab was 17 million.
comment in response to
post
First, this post doesn't say what you are trying to put forth. Second, if the Nature study isn't concerning when it comes to the mRNA jabs, let's go back to Pfizer's own data. 126 serious adverse events in the mRNA jabbed and the 111 in the placebo. Going back to the beginning is fine by me.
comment in response to
post
Negative immune effects in 25-30% of the cohort. That's why the mRNA treatment for cancer will be changing. No longer will there be a pseudouridine base. What's unfortunate is that it may be part of the mechanism of action for the harms that did happen in the populace.
comment in response to
post
I think there might be a bit of mirror looking to do. However, that doesn't change the facts. Now with the Nature study we may see part of the mechanism of harm for the mRNA jabs. The silver lining is that the pseudouridine base will not longer be used.
comment in response to
post
I think there might be a bit of mirror looking to do. However, that doesn't change the facts. Now with the Nature study we may see part of the mechanism of harm for the mRNA jabs. The silver lining is that the pseudouridine base will not longer be used.
comment in response to
post
Many times it's docs who reported these deaths and harms to people because the effect was rather immediate. I know a young man who was terribly harmed unfortunately. The numbers for the mRNA vaccine thus far are higher than the numbers for the swine flu vaccine harms and that vaccine was recalled.
comment in response to
post
I have posted the VAERS data. Unfortunately there were many deaths. With the Nature study we may now know at least part of the mechanism of harm. This is why all future mRNA treatments (as for cancer) will have a different base.
comment in response to
post
Well primarily it is not us humans who have faith anyway. God is a God of faith and he "enfaiths." But that's a talk for a different hour. Right now, the point is that mRNA jabs were harmful and now we may now the mechanism as per the Nature study.
comment in response to
post
Yes, I don't really feel like a short goat eating neanderthal hangin out under bridges! And I must add I don't feel lonely or sad for that matter, nor do I feel like I am easily scammed. I do know however that the mRNA jabs were quite poor conceived, tested and manufactured. :)
comment in response to
post
Hmmm...perhaps short neanderthals who live under bridges and eat goats are quite right about mRNA jabs being harmful. Perhaps they have access to the pertinent studies under there.