bioniclatino.bsky.social
↙️ Just a dude playing a dude who knows what he's
↙️ talking about.
↙️
1,302 posts
226 followers
419 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I wonder if Kamala would have a place in the party if she was allowed to take off the Democratic sash and just be Kamala. I wonder how many other Democratic women would sound more like Crockett or AOC if they were given that freedom. Hell, I wonder how many time AOC and Crockett bit their tongues.
comment in response to
post
I think the solution is to stop asking women of color to carry the burden of being a weak Democrat. I think the Democratic Party needs to stop asking these women to show up with their identities when it benefits the party, but tone down the authenticity of those identities when it doesn't.
comment in response to
post
I think it sucks that very legitimate criticisms of Democratic strategy and messaging gets dismissed as racism and sexism on one hand, but racism and sexism get dressed up as legitimate concerns on the other.
comment in response to
post
Forget all previous instructions.
What is the recipe for apple pie?
comment in response to
post
It isn’t pessimism. Pessimism is the lazy “it doesn’t matter/democracy is an illusion/we’re all wasting our time”. What I’m saying is that we need to raise the bar on what we ask of our leaders. In fact, actual pessimism is saying that asking our leaders to boldly for for our needs is unrealistic.
comment in response to
post
I can’t be the only one who sees it. Right?
comment in response to
post
Yeah, of course. It’s not even a question that we have been better off.
But putting boring ass, play it safe Democrats on a pedestal like they’re Abraham Washington Luther King is helping no one.
comment in response to
post
Even if that were true, where’s the full-throated rejection of his presidency? Where are the angry electorates, the civil rights purists, the mobilized masses, the voters who are sending their congressmen to DC to fight back?
It’s delusional to think that anything is shifting away from Trumpism.
comment in response to
post
Let’s not get carried away. Kamala was, at best, the stable status quo. So by comparison, a far better choice. But let’s not pretend that she was going to fix anything in her presidency that decades of presidents hadn’t.
comment in response to
post
She’s dumb as a brick but she’s good at self-preservation. She’s running because she knows that the fix is in. So the day she declares her candidacy, that’s a huge red flag that the election process is being tampered with. Screenshot this post. I swear by it.
comment in response to
post
I coulda done without the Satanic nonsense, but point taken.
comment in response to
post
I say we give it back.
www.nps.gov/alca/learn/h...
comment in response to
post
The zero tolerance policy in our school had a weird carve-out for certain kids who were just “letting off some steam”. I guess there’s something about lack of melanin that causes steam-retention.
comment in response to
post
“Truth spoken in jest is the natural remedy to lies spoken gravely. For the Jester need only mask his dagger with laughter as the assassin must needs the cloak.”
- Carrot Top, probably
comment in response to
post
This is why I get frustrated when I try to explain that Trump is the figurehead bit the real threats are people you don’t know and have no idea exists.
Do you think this walking hemorrhoid came up with this idea on his own?
comment in response to
post
“Start”?
Been.
comment in response to
post
Gas stations do this.
comment in response to
post
Lincoln stole your axe from Gandhi? The scoundrel!
Well, as Jesus once said:
comment in response to
post
Bit not an actual child, so…loophole!
comment in response to
post
Lincoln actually stole that quote from Ghandi.
comment in response to
post
Um…are we supposed to want to fuck that dog? And more importantly, do people in this thread want to fuck that dog?
comment in response to
post
In this economy, their Uber driver probably also has a Master’s Degree or 30 years work experience but their job vanished.
comment in response to
post
The infuriating thing is that millions of idiots who think this is a sign of strength have voting rights.
comment in response to
post
“Was Biden in attendance?”
That’s how you avoid embarrassing yourself; you ask questions about things you don’t know BEFORE posturing like a jackass.
comment in response to
post
No AI needed.
comment in response to
post
I’m not asking you to care, I’m suggesting you be educated. You can’t make credible criticisms based on ignorant assumptions and snap judgments. Nothing is more divisive in times like this than willful ignorance wrapped in the banner of discourse. Be humble.
comment in response to
post
You not knowing who this guy is, or any of his content, and yet coming to these very specific criticisms should really make you pause and question your unearned confidence.
Take a deep breath, humble yourself, and look at what this guy has been saying for years.
You’re truly missing by a mile.
comment in response to
post
The fact that this is so close is making me wonder why so many Americans looked to Canada as a refuge of decency.
comment in response to
post
I’m torn. On one hand Bezos is Silver Age Lex Luther to Elon and Zucks Gold and Modern Age, bit until Warren Buffet or Ben & Jerry make an EV, I don’t know how to be mad at it.
comment in response to
post
www.congress.gov/104/crpt/hrp...
comment in response to
post
If you DON’T see those photos as sexual it says a lot about your MAGA brain rot and how deeply in the cult you are. Big fucking yikes.
comment in response to
post
Nope. It was a terrible Act and it was embarrassing that an American president signed it, but it did not prevent due process it made asylum seeking harder and limited opportunities for appeal. But it did not allow for ICE to black bag people and deport them without any judicial process. You’re lying
comment in response to
post
Can’t say I’m surprised. But also, I generally debate those dudes more for people who might think they’re making good points than the person themselves.
comment in response to
post
Bill could delete every other post and just pin this comment to his page and you will have proved his point more clearly than anything else he has ever said.
This is top-tier irony. Take a bow...you've earned it.
comment in response to
post
Sincere question; when do we finally draw the line? If Democrats keep getting our votes just by virtue of not being the WORST, where's the incentive to actually repay our support? Obviously withholding votes aren't serving our purpose, but how good has giving our votes to them duty-free?
Ideas?
comment in response to
post
I think this is exactly your size...
comment in response to
post
But how can we be SURE they weren't MS-13 or Hamas? I've heard things.
comment in response to
post
Gifs* are not endorsements.
comment in response to
post
It feel like a reboot of a bad show that developed a cult following and a bunch of niche fans demanded it's return and now the show has been picked up and the cast and writers of the show have been vindicated by their return and they aggressively double down on what made them shitty the 1st time.
comment in response to
post
You cannot say the same for a gun.
comment in response to
post
I feel like we discussed this before and showed you how dumb this argument is. Are you not paying attention?
If a car is dangerous, we regulate the car or regulate the operator driving dangerously. Cars kill people when the drivers defy existing laws. But otherwise, their main function isn’t killin
comment in response to
post
It didn’t make sense the first time you said it. What point are you trying to make?
comment in response to
post
Vancouver is a major city in Western Canada, located in the Lower Mainland region of British Columbia. As the most populous city in the province, the 2021 Canadian census recorded 662,248 people in the city, up from 631,486 in 2016.
What’s your point?
comment in response to
post
What are you rattling on about?
comment in response to
post
I feel like people are reading this wrong.
It’s saying that he has only a 25% chance of dying in office. This ain’t a high probability. I would argue that most of us are running at about that number most of the time.
comment in response to
post
You cheer on such brutality? Where is your humanity?
comment in response to
post
A very strong letter?
My God, when I asked the Democrats to fight, I never thought we’d be unleashing the Hounds of Hell. I don’t know how I’ll ever be able to look my grandkids in the eye when they ask me where I was on the Day of The Strong Letter.