bmcaymanian.algo.xyz
2,323 posts
343 followers
1,050 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
This.
comment in response to
post
He is so rich he can’t go broke. He cares more about implementing segregation than he does about the economy.
comment in response to
post
Feels like kayfabe. Musk trying to shed his maga image. Just like Trump doesn’t really hate Maggie haberman.
comment in response to
post
I think we are saying the same thing.
comment in response to
post
There shouldnt be purity tests, but there should be some red lines.
comment in response to
post
Liberals fighting to make their life better while they keep electing people that kick them in the teeth. Racism is a hell of a drug.
comment in response to
post
Good job providing cover politico. You are fucking trash.
comment in response to
post
In the general? Are we still doing this stupid shit?
comment in response to
post
Oh, I don’t think currencies should be replaced. Just brought onto the blockchain to reduce friction and overheads.
comment in response to
post
I’m convinced they don’t actually want power. Just want to appear that they are trying. If they get power they will actually have to implement progressive policies and the big donors don’t want that.
comment in response to
post
You are part of the problem.
comment in response to
post
$25 to send a wire transfer that settles in 2 days. Or less than 1¢ and settles in 3 seconds. The traditional banking system is old and energy intensive as well. But thanks for hearing me out.
comment in response to
post
Bitcoin is so slow. Come into the future brother.
comment in response to
post
I don’t think BTC is viable as a replacement. It can still be a store of value. But it’s slow and energy intensive. Other blockchains have solved the issues. But as you say, the Bitcoin bros aren’t really concerned about those and just want to cash out.
comment in response to
post
That’s fair.
comment in response to
post
At the risk of being mass blocked. I don’t think crypto is inherently bad,and there are projects that left leaning people can feel good about. Taking some control away from the big banks isn’t a bad thing. But it might be too late as they saw the threat,tried to kill it,failed and now are buying in
comment in response to
post
Jake tapper is becoming Lou Dobbs.
comment in response to
post
Now they will be recommended to get the vaccine after they get long COVID.
comment in response to
post
Does it still have the juice?
comment in response to
post
You do you. But you don’t get to ask the people who are most in danger from the systems you are tacitly supporting to sign off on you doing so.
comment in response to
post
What did van jones do with the 100 million that bezos gave him?
comment in response to
post
She’s been having rallies all over the country. People should ignore you for good reason.
comment in response to
post
You aren’t arguing in good faith. AOC has been serving 5 years. Way to round up.
comment in response to
post
Aoc rally sizes rivaling Trump’s doesn’t really support your antidotes. But again trying something different is prudent. Given this. GOP is showing wrong but strong is beating weak but right. Let’s try strong and right and see how that works out. Or we can do more of the same?
comment in response to
post
That the thing about this strategy. Running left candidates in safe blue seats won’t lose. The primary is basically the whole election. What is does is raise the number of elected progressives so we get better policy.
comment in response to
post
Lose harder? Or maybe we win by doing something different? Going Republican lite hasn’t really been working. Look at dem approval ratings. It’s worse than Trump. More of the same is a bad path to take if you think about it.
comment in response to
post
Anyone to the right of AOC shouldn’t be occupying a safe dem seat. Those seats should be for the real progressives. Leave the moderate dems to win swing seats. Leadership shouldn’t be to the right of aoc either. They should just be pragmatic about what they can get done.
comment in response to
post
There are a bunch of safe seat Dems that need to be primaried.
comment in response to
post
I thought it was about research.
comment in response to
post
Counterpoint. Having 6 less votes is still bad.
comment in response to
post
Do the slower drivers own the road?
comment in response to
post
He also fucking lied about this topic already. Maybe report that?
comment in response to
post
Going after useless safe seat Dems is the way. They don’t care when you attack the swing seat Dems that have to walk on the tight rope. They don’t have to do anything meaningful in the minority. Useless safe seat Dems thrive in the minority. Hope people are taking notes.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/nbcn...
comment in response to
post
Absolutely not you clown.
comment in response to
post
Nope. Sorry. If you voted for Trump you are an idiot that deserves scorn.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Yeah. The media needs their clicks. Get back to us when they are in election(elect Republicans) mode again.
comment in response to
post
NYT is Republican propaganda that’s why.
comment in response to
post
Yeah. This is a good map. Not many weak dem seats up and a ton of seats that republicans need to defend.
comment in response to
post
82 games of basketball is a lot of games of basketball.
comment in response to
post
Primary any safe seat dem that calls elected republicans “my friends”.
comment in response to
post
Yeah but he lies, you fucking marks.
comment in response to
post
How many of those people did mark Warner vote to confirm?
comment in response to
post
I hate Schumer more everyday.
comment in response to
post
Primary safe seat Dems. David Hogg is right.
comment in response to
post
Dan saying that he rather white democrats struck me as well.
comment in response to
post
So you refused to ceasefire until after the election?