Profile avatar
bouncybear8998.bsky.social
Retired trial lawyer turned college economics professor. Political enthusiast. Proud dad.
257 posts 106 followers 72 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
If you are on X and think you oppose Nazi propaganda, no you don’t.
comment in response to post
You mean while I worked for her campaign?
comment in response to post
A strongly worded letter? Where is she???
comment in response to post
A leader also shows up. Where is she??
comment in response to post
I agree with Liberty. She’s ghosted our cause ever since she lost.
comment in response to post
She’s ghosted our cause.
comment in response to post
Those aren’t facts. Those are opinions. And they’re shared by many. And he’s allowed to have them.
comment in response to post
Garland, Comey and Mueller. Man. They really sucked.
comment in response to post
When you demystify the highest political office in the land people start to think that any moron can do the job.
comment in response to post
What if we all agree to hold Musk harmless and buy more Teslas? Then will he tell us?
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
I always knew a strongly worded letter would do it!! #MissionAccomplished
comment in response to post
TACO
comment in response to post
He’s not leaving. He’s just done. Done installing the malware and downloading all the data.
comment in response to post
Well, now I’m concerned that YOUR account is controlled by Nancy Mace.
comment in response to post
Looking forward to your admission that you were wrong. After all, you’re no “petulant ass baby” right?
comment in response to post
Where’s the Taco Bell by my house?
comment in response to post
Nonetheless, here you go sweetheart.
comment in response to post
Calls into question the accuracy of media reporting on politics. Tough for you to understand, I see. But hey, you’re the one that is out here defending media reports as 100% accurate.
comment in response to post
Convenient to make an assertion and then shift the burden of proof. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡
comment in response to post
bsky.app/profile/nyti... Here’s the media you 100% defend. Completely accurate reporting according to you!
comment in response to post
He kept doing it though. We all saw it and heard it! It was a part of his stump speech. He said it repeatedly. But maybe all that didn’t happen because the media reported that it didn’t. And maybe the media’s reporting on Trump is 100% accurate these days despite what we’re all seeing. 🤷🏽‍♂️🤡
comment in response to post
Now who’s being a petulant baby?
comment in response to post
2/2 They let Walz be himself and we lost. He had to appeal to the left, but he also had to bring in the Centre. And he did his best and that was quite good. Only a petulant ass baby would blame Dems instead of a misogynist racist electorate. They would rather die than vote for a black woman.
comment in response to post
1/2 The fact that a bunch of news organizations picked up and ran the same bullshit story that the Democrats were in disarray and we’re eating their own is not new. We all heard him say “weird“ ad nauseam. That’s how we all know what the “weird” thing means!
comment in response to post
Calling people names in the internet is so metal. I’m sunk proud of you little guy. 🥰 You’re so big and strong now. 🥰
comment in response to post
Ah yes, the “if only they would’ve done what I was saying they would’ve won” take.
comment in response to post
You’re so metal bro. Like you’re the most leftists metal bro there is.
comment in response to post
He doubled down on “weird” even including it multiple times in his stump speech. Politico is notorious for “unnamed sources close to the candidate” when they talked to that one guy that volunteered for a week. They let Walz be very Walz, he’s just not as radical as some Leftists wanted. Not Bernie.
comment in response to post
Nobody ruined him, Carol. Sit down and take a break.
comment in response to post
Ok I see that now. Thought it went from ~42-48 which are both about +-3 points from 45 if that was the actual number. Maybe I read that wrong with the margin if error.
comment in response to post
Isn’t he gaining ground with Democrats? And within the margin of error (+-3) since January? It’s fairly deceptive to zoom in so tight to a graph that shows basically no change outside the margin of error and claim a trend.
comment in response to post
Trump’s approval rating is the highest it’s been. 😳🤦🏽‍♂️
comment in response to post
Trump’s approval rating is the highest it’s been. 😳🤦🏽‍♂️
comment in response to post
Trump’s approval rating is the highest it’s been. 😳🤦🏽‍♂️
comment in response to post
Trump’s approval rating is the highest it’s been. 😳🤦🏽‍♂️
comment in response to post
Trump’s approval rating is the highest it’s been. 😳🤦🏽‍♂️