bruiserchgo.bsky.social
Chicagoan, liberal, LGBT, tech, gaming, etc.
915 posts
264 followers
199 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
WTAF? We’re so fucked.
comment in response to
post
😂
comment in response to
post
Absolutely terrible idea but I’ve been rather appalled to hear friends in Chicago speaking positively about him lately. Or at least not saying he’s garbage, which he is.
comment in response to
post
I was salutatorian of my high school class so I knew the word 😆
comment in response to
post
DEI graduate!
comment in response to
post
Sick. An elected official singling out a college graduate, a high achieving one at that, with an unprovoked ad hominem attack on them. Honestly not sure humanity deserves to continue.
comment in response to
post
I probably did at some point in the past but not in recent years.
comment in response to
post
*he probably doesn’t know
comment in response to
post
You know, like for data and stuff! Probably trying to better (umm) target shoppers with ads, coupons, etc. for things they’re more likely to buy, I guess. Really nothing new about that. Honestly be probably doesn’t know either.
comment in response to
post
Oh someone sold the CEO on some magic AI beans, everything is going to be fine at Target!
comment in response to
post
I rarely use this word but wow what a cunt.
comment in response to
post
This also pretends “progressives” only have 1 plank in our platform: minority rights, while ignoring the others: healthcare, gun control, taxes, social safety nets, environmental protection, consumer protection, etc. most of which benefit vast majority of Americans, even working class white men
comment in response to
post
Autocrats are always going to find some minority group to demonize. It’s part of the playbook. The only thing “progressives” not standing up for them accomplishes is depriving that group of any allies or champions.
comment in response to
post
Or drone strikes or anything else the US has been doing for years.
comment in response to
post
It would be as bad as killing random Americans and celebrating that because the cuts to USAID have resulted in the deaths of people overseas and somehow we’re all guilty of that. Terrible, stupid precedent.
comment in response to
post
I beg to differ. I’ve gotten every one
comment in response to
post
No it’s that and doing Dear Leader’s bidding: persecuting his enemies, providing air cover for his bullshit and generally spinning like crazy
comment in response to
post
I agree it’s horrific, but that second sentence… we’re living in bizarro world
comment in response to
post
I agree 100%! Dems have been out messaged for years (decades?), when will they realize their tactics aren’t working?
comment in response to
post
This regime is drowning in corruption, breaking laws left and right, defying the courts, committing atrocities… Democrats in Congress shouldn’t vote for anything (except perhaps emergency disaster relief if needed) Rs put forward… withhold cloture, do everything they can to gum up the works
comment in response to
post
Not to mention it’s probably just asking people their opinion on different slogans, which does little to gauge the effectiveness of a slogan when it’s repeated over and over throughout the media by multiple people.
comment in response to
post
There are already so many monopolies—or duopolies or triopolies (if that’s a thing) that essentially collude—that were practically there now.
comment in response to
post
The Republican Party needs to be excised like a malignant tumor. There is a place for a reasonable right leaning party in the US, but the GOP has gone off the deep end and may be beyond saving at this point
comment in response to
post
See bsky.app/profile/thef...
comment in response to
post
Real answer: that didn’t poll well so they were told not to…
comment in response to
post
Better late than never! Good to see they’re finally starting to learn to be an opposition party.
comment in response to
post
He doesn’t see a reason to “do political spending” because he already bought and paid for a president. He can officially “step away” while unofficially wielding great (and fully corrupt) influence politically.
comment in response to
post
Right, if done via executive decree, with no “audit or investigation”, a case could be made that the law doesn’t cover such a scenario. Maybe there’s some case law saying it does, but SCOTUS would simply ignore that if it got that far.
comment in response to
post
There’s probably enough room in the wording for the regime to wiggle through to remove tax exempt status without an “investigation” and have SCOTUS rubber stamp it, if challenged. Not sure if there is case law on such a scenario but we know SCOTUS doesn’t care about that anyway.
comment in response to
post
I had to see her* face keep popping up on screens at a TSA checkpoint over the weekend and I wanted to throw something at them.
*Noem, not Hassan obvi
comment in response to
post
Does … he not know what kind of doctor she is? Or is he making fun of her? Either way, what a dick. Legit curious how the presidential medical team missed it though
comment in response to
post
Yes, for us that content is mostly for when we’re half watching, like while making dinner or cleaning up.
comment in response to
post
I watch plenty of HGTV and Food Network programming on Max. But that’s not why we have it.
comment in response to
post
Cool. Maybe they can also fix their shitty Roku app
comment in response to
post
She’s still alive?
comment in response to
post
*everybody believes Donald Trump can be bought
comment in response to
post
This is fine. 7 year olds are famously independent and don’t require parenting. Or food for that matter!
comment in response to
post
Please! It’s too much winning!
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/thef...