bryank1.bsky.social
Left leaning, pro-Europe, pro-green, pro-compassion. Will follow back like minded souls.
933 posts
2,116 followers
7,270 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
There is a lot more to the site, just not many pictures of it. It's a bit harsh of the BBC to use that image.
www.gov.wales/parc-cybi-ho...
comment in response to
post
That's a poor reason for voting against though. Yes there are two problems and this only addresses one of them, but the alternative is doing nothing. This bill going through should hopefully increase pressure to improve palliative care.
comment in response to
post
That's the intention, but it's currently in a trial and nothing is being enforced. Lessons will have been learned since New York.
If the system is found to be 100% effective, what's the problem with it being automatic enforcement? The article says it's working as expected.
comment in response to
post
The article says AI is being used as a trial in Barcelona and not issuing any tickets, which seems fair to me.
But then the article says it's bad because it went wrong in New York, and then explains that was because humans weren't doing their job checking it.
Conflating the two is unfair.
comment in response to
post
I get most of my news from the radio while I'm doing something else. Rarely gets a mention.
comment in response to
post
Does China have arguments about electricity pylons like we do in the UK? How are they getting the power to where it's needed?
comment in response to
post
So if the AI was better and only flagged genuine transgressions, and if a human in the loop actually did their job and reviewed them, would you support this? Both seem achievable goals.
comment in response to
post
I wonder how bad things are going to have to get before that 38% start to be concerned.
comment in response to
post
But 73% of the population support it according to polls. Not a very representative democracy.
comment in response to
post
Slow news day?
comment in response to
post
How does it propose enforcing such a ban though? And when?
comment in response to
post
41% is a very high number to happily be ignoring the downsides of increasing temperatures. At this stage in global warming, the figures being that close is disturbing.
comment in response to
post
It's a bit late now
comment in response to
post
Maybe 2% didn't understand the question?
comment in response to
post
Damn, it's actually true...
www.joe.co.uk/news/nigel-f...
comment in response to
post
So bombing hospitals is a bad thing now, right? I can't keep up.
comment in response to
post
When they say data centres "consume" water, what do they mean? The water isn't being destroyed, don't they recycle and reuse it?
comment in response to
post
Interesting that in the US they are having "no kings" protests. And here we are with a literal king.
comment in response to
post
Is this why, when you take a loan out from a bank, the bank effectively creates new money to give to you, balanced off by the debt on their books? They are not lending from a pile of cash in a vault from savers or anything like that.
comment in response to
post
Feels like we're still waiting for that promised next AI model to be released that changes everything.
comment in response to
post
It's a good job nobody is daft enough to build their whole business model on the 24/7 availability of AI isn't it?
comment in response to
post
I live in a city. It'd be great if there weren't so many people in it.
comment in response to
post
They clearly see a way to make money out of a loss making business. How does that work?