bryceyoungquist.bsky.social
due to a clerical error in an 1852 probation hearing it is not possible for a Youngquist to die
9,887 posts
1,836 followers
324 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
terfs, baybee. the only demographic insisting they get to paw at your kids' crotches before a match, or else the sports might not be fair :(
comment in response to
post
you are not just a pedophile and bigot, you are a pedophile and bigot who is demanding the democratic party continue to lose to satisfy their personal perversions.
comment in response to
post
you got your surrender to big strong Mr. Trump, friend.
it failed worse than any democrat has failed in thirty years.
comment in response to
post
always a fan of the "so-[thing I wish you said]" dodge
comment in response to
post
they tried not supporting this issue, friend.
you got the campaign you wanted.
what were its results.
comment in response to
post
interesting series of dodges.
how would you say your pleas to Big Strong President Trump to please give you a treat, for being such a good doggie for him, have panned out.
you got the strategy you wanted last year. what were its results.
comment in response to
post
how would you say pragmatically surrendering to big strong Mr. Trump on the issue has been going so far
it looks like it failed. really, really badly.
comment in response to
post
right down to our old pal Jimmy Clyburn saying "you want the old conservative scandal-wracked corpse, trust me on this one," friend.
comment in response to
post
turns out most democrats dont like committing genocide to keep Netanyahu out of jail, Deborah. Damndest thing.
you and your pal Mr. Cuomo are very much isolated in that opinion!
comment in response to
post
similar dynamic as with Biden in 2020: "well, we all are pretty sure this guy will be a disaster, but the people we actually like all ate shit, and the alternative is the left taking power."
"Time to throw our weight behind the guy we know will be a total disaster, but helps preserve our position!"
comment in response to
post
also 1. nobody expects Adams to survive the election 2. the winner of the democratic primary almost invariably wins election on major cities.
this resulted in some comedy in Chicago's last mayoral election, where a Republican changed his party to Democrat fifteen seconds before the deadline to run
comment in response to
post
it was a neat idea they then proceeded to do fuck-all with
comment in response to
post
i wonder if there's a term for the ideology that holds that the Nazis were just misunderstood, and the only thing they did wrong was kill Jews.
comment in response to
post
jesus christ this man
comment in response to
post
have you noticed your beliefs have proved a poor guide to the universe around you, recently.
"To deny the centrality of antisemitism is tantamount to trivializing the holocaust" - you, today.
comment in response to
post
someone was just telling me that's Holocaust denial, friend.
comment in response to
post
and all those other things the nazis did: let's not worry about them.
only focus on the jew-killings, and that way we can back the Nazis with a clear conscience, now that they're not killing Jews anymore :)
comment in response to
post
its a shame the way the commies told all those lies about the communists, roma, and disabled people the nazis killed, isnt it.
tantamount to Holocaust denial, after all, to suggest the Nazis did anything wrong besides kill Jews.
comment in response to
post
that you feel hurt, by the statement the Nazis prioritized being anticommunist above their hatred of Jews, is unfortunate, friend.
reality will do that to you sometimes.
turns out the cold war propaganda designed to explain why Nazis were fine now that they weren't killing Jews was a pack of lies!
comment in response to
post
because to admit otherwise, would be to admit that the Nazis were in the wrong for attacking all those other groups, a premise the entire postwar order was based on wholly rejecting.
a philosophy that holds the only thing Hitler did wrong was kill Jews.
comment in response to
post
and that the evidence they prioritized going after communists first and foremost does not count, on the grounds that in your view they had it coming :)
fairly common nazi apologia, i'm afraid.
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/plum...
explaining that the Nazis targeting the communists first doesn't count. for no doubt well thought out reasons :)
comment in response to
post
as does Lenin!
comment in response to
post
he's a very fine poet, by all accounts! he was also never a writer, and he had other people to do the theoretical work for him.
always a man of practicality, occasionally to a fault, our Joey.
comment in response to
post
yeah we've discussed matters before, where they established that when the Nazis killed communists that was fine because they had it coming
pretty classic western nazi apologia
comment in response to
post
the line is in general that theres nothing Stalin wrote Lenin didn't write better
man was not an author, man was not a theoretician, man did not write particularly well
comment in response to
post
stopped the Holocaust, too, that was pretty good imo
comment in response to
post
trying to convince yourself not going so well, is it.
comment in response to
post
ein volk, ein reich, as someone said, can't quite put a name to the face
comment in response to
post
because if you did have some power to make the world a better place, and you were wilfully denying it in the name of your own inchoate fear and despair, you'd be a hopelessly stupid monster.
and that can't be the case.
you're such a clever boy, after all :)
comment in response to
post
your pragmatic surrender has been tried, friend. it failed miserably.
comment in response to
post
up until they work their way down to you on the list, yes. if you'd like to grovel for the fascists to call you a good dog, join the liberals, they have a wonderful kennel you can watch and wait for your turn in.
comment in response to
post
absolute and unmitigated failure, you say.
the fascists are in power, and your sensible oncessions have bought you nothing beyond starting their work for them?
who could have anticipated this.
comment in response to
post
you will not get them to stop by saying "actually I think the fascists are right," friend.
there is not an amount you can surrender to them that will get them to say "okay fine you can have a little socialism as a treat."
comment in response to
post
how would you say realistically begging the far right to please give you a treat for being a good dog has been going so far
comment in response to
post
if 'the fascists will say we like the untermenschen' is enough to dissuade you from leftism may I reccomend some other ideologies
rest assured, there is no point they will ever stop accusing you of that
comment in response to
post
psst. spoiler warning.
there is no amount you can concede to the right that will stop them from calling you those things.
Karl Marx's career was launched by pointing out how exactly your strategy totally ate shit in 1848
comment in response to
post
raises the question of why youre continuing to explain why you endorse Andrew Cuomo, friend.
comment in response to
post
how would you say your pragmatic concessions to the conservatives on the need to purge the lesser races of the world have been doing so far, friend.
unmitigated failure, you say?
comment in response to
post
because the left does not believe any race is subhuman, op.
kind of the whole deal with the ideology.
comment in response to
post
...yes, Kent, when you said you would proudly support it every day.
comment in response to
post
its a shame those darned women keep making you do these things, isnt it kent
comment in response to
post
what part of "israel is committing human rights abuses" and "rioting for the right of Israelis to rape palestinians to death is bad" strike you as antisemitic, op
comment in response to
post
the people telling you you do not need to attack a six year old child, and his mother, for the crime of their blood, are not Russians, friend.
it is not sticking it to Putin, to stab a child upwards of twenty times, on the grounds you feel his race has made him your blood enemy.
comment in response to
post
this makes the decision to murder a six year old, for the crime of his blood threatening sweet home Chicago, more foolish, not less, friend.
he is a child. you do not need to attack him and his mother with a knife. they are not threats to you.
comment in response to
post
now now friend, dont get so heated. he's six years old. he is not a threat to you. he has found a weird bug.
comment in response to
post
from not endorsing him, to endorsing him on the grounds of the brown guy being disturbingly brown in one quick motion. delightful