Profile avatar
callmac.bsky.social
Professional responsible traveller. @calmac on the foto app. I'll read your...blue skies? Tweets? Anyway, I'll read them, but can't guarantee I'll understand them.
1,266 posts 334 followers 918 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Rather than trying to win them to her cause, trying to kill the soldiers, one by one, in broad daylight is exactly the sophistication I would expect of her coup.
comment in response to post
Kemi: Yes...and?
comment in response to post
You're doing god's work. That voyeur perv.
comment in response to post
The thing with toxic masculinity is that there will always be another self proclaimed 3d chess grandmaster to fill this role of "person who does not see the people he is standing on while he makes awful decisions". Must be useful for the PMs to have that queue of sociopathic scape goats.
comment in response to post
As this came up first, I thought it was rhyming slang, and there was news about failures at Thames Water again.
comment in response to post
Yes, but we would have said this showed how "authentic" he was, or something equally vapid. There's nothing redeeming in him, but I don't mind that he's angry about breaking a cease fire, even if he's part responsible for the firing. Especially as he was angry with Netanyahu too.
comment in response to post
I was on a kitsch tour of LA years ago, and the guide said "on the left is the toilet where poor innocent George Michael was arrested for being gay. So unjust, they don't arrest Ben Affleck and Matt Damon!" To this day I refer to him as Poor, Innocent George Michael.
comment in response to post
I assume you are holding most of it back for the publication of "It's All One Book: Dating For Good Boys, Raising Good Boys, Nudging Good Boys and Starting a Business For and With Good Boys"
comment in response to post
Lovely to see a photo of someone exercising their telekinetic super power as well.
comment in response to post
It's such a low bar. Excuse the pun. I concede! I might politely laugh at whatever horrible tasteless joke they made, then feel gross at myself. But I wouldn't feel the need to call out their genocidal ways, like I would with Goebbels, Netanyahu and Putin. Which would spoil that pint.
comment in response to post
Oh I did, and I totally agree with the last para. But, I just feel like I have met these types, and my reaction is not based on their political views, but their personalities, and it is "don't make eye contact, don't engage, coyote ugly myself out of talking with them"
comment in response to post
Really, no offence meant. But I have never understood this idea. I may spend too much time in the pub, each of those are the types I know instinctively to avoid. Farage - loud, obnoxious, blowhard Boris - toff, psuedo intellectual a-hole Trump - firstly, doesn't drink. Secondly, rapey idiot.
comment in response to post
The guy looks like daredevil, how could he not win?
comment in response to post
It's great. I wouldn't be surprised if you get several letters threatening to sue you as people just assume you are talking about them.
comment in response to post
I'm back to Madagascar* on Sunday, and feel exactly the same way. *fully saying this as an opportunity to boast
comment in response to post
In order to argue with my dad, I listen to the Speccies podcasts, incl their out loud articles. The content is really poor. It's a mix of woe-is-me, under attack landlord style stories, and faux-proustian, over written, cutesy filler.
comment in response to post
"Anglofuturist" is a word you could 100% be convinced there is a silly swear word hidden within.
comment in response to post
I know it's not even close to the point, but his suit is getting weirdly close to this
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
What I like about this, is that he sounds 1 part Brad Pitt from 12 Monkeys and 1 part Linkedin profile. It's nice to see both these so seamlessly melded.
comment in response to post
The interesting juxtaposition of this usage. The use of "whey", almost a homonym to the enthusiasm of "Wahey", followed immediately by "pipette", with the feminine suffix. Clearly showing the character putting an overtly proud facade onto his concern over his own masculinity.
comment in response to post
Also, everyone is wrong about the talking thing. It's not bad to speak to people on public transport, it's bad to be spoken to. That's what we really don't want.
comment in response to post
I think, if you ride a bus in London regularly, then you are a londoner, and should be offered citizenship.
comment in response to post
Yeah, but then we're progressives. They want things to be shit for more people again, and better for them. You know, the good old days.
comment in response to post
Everyone forgets that stilton is actually a noble gas, and brie has the same atomic weight as palladium. Classic.
comment in response to post
That is the single worst thing I have ever read. Congratulations, David Frost.
comment in response to post
Thought this was an @theonion.com headline
comment in response to post
The heat in my house
comment in response to post
There was SO much idiotic right wingery. But there were some smart people being evil and corrupt behind it all. This time it seems to be dumb people being evil and corrupt right up front.
comment in response to post
"The pyramids were built on a smaller budget and no one worried about bats or newts. It's all woke!" "Sure, mum. Still on facebook eh?"
comment in response to post
I get my flu shot every autumn from mine too, and travel vaccinations/meds. I'm always impressed by their knowledge.
comment in response to post
Just whatsapp them to colleagues or distant acquaintances, they'll love em.
comment in response to post
Do christians believe they actually hear god's voice? But an actual voice? I always thought that it was more like a conscience type thing, rather than actual speech. Follow up q. Is it a conversation? And if not, why not? Or is it like the annoying friend sending voice notes on whatsapp?
comment in response to post
Pharmacists are seriously impressive.
comment in response to post
The inarguable one is the plug. The other things I imagine I will get push back on are... Toilets Supermarkets - not the produce, the set up Airports - I know we hate them, but they are good here Pubs Museums and art galleries - we just stole so much stuff, and so many are free.
comment in response to post
This sounds like the highest compliment someone like him could offer.
comment in response to post
It's weird because the yanks are actually pretty good at both parades and marching formations. When they send people to the Edinburgh Military Tattoo they are pretty freaking impressive. Why didn't they rope them in? Where's all the military marching bands? youtu.be/jIzIKjWibJI?...
comment in response to post
But...but the Spectator says...
comment in response to post
I'm going to bang the drum for a newer writer for children's books, Katherine Rundell writes an effin good book. The kid and I have read a few now, and I'd put her right up there.
comment in response to post
I think there's something on this. I do feel HP got a huge amount of kids reading HP, and hopefully many went on, but I have met quite a few adults who are really still just into HP.
comment in response to post
This just gave me a flashback. I think I was really into Jack Higgins as an 11 year old.
comment in response to post
Vindicated. It's too late for me, save yourself.
comment in response to post
Since I've been working from home it has felt like my fridge is out to get me.
comment in response to post
Or wine
comment in response to post
I think it's on purpose. Part of trying to appeal to Reform voters.
comment in response to post
Give the guy a break. He's not a multi tasker, and he's busy oppressing his people.