carlossian.bsky.social
290 posts
188 followers
51 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Now come on, I'm pretty sure Putin is a fan
comment in response to
post
Pretty sure it's just the residual misogyny of the people writing where they still think of woman as belonging to someone else
comment in response to
post
And one last thing on the original point before you're hissy fits
www.theguardian.com/business/202...
comment in response to
post
I'd say it to your face you sad sack, I just have better things to do than start fights on the internet little guy. Hopefully one day you'll have enough of a life to do the same. Goodbye you sad strange little man.
comment in response to
post
Delete the account. Their income is based on its user base. If it has no users it has no income and it dies. Same with X/Twitter.
comment in response to
post
You literally did the same to me you hypocrite. Honestly mate. And then you asked what area I lived. You know it's all available in the thread right? Fucking hell 🤦
comment in response to
post
Why would I tell you that? You know how the internet works right? I'm not giving a creep any info, let alone stuff to help him track me down after stalking my profile.... Honestly mate, get a fucking grip whilst i mute you
comment in response to
post
What difference would that make you creep?
comment in response to
post
Then don't be a shill mate 🤷
comment in response to
post
If a company's debts are too large to make it prohibitive, it's not making profits or providing an acceptable level of service, then bankruptcy is exactly what it should be doing? Like a failing business. And shareholders investing in failure shouldn't be bailed out.
And definitely a clueless shill.
comment in response to
post
If the debt is so high to be prohibitive then the business is worth nothing, so the shares are worth nothing.
And it's far from impossible, you just sound like a shill by claiming so.
comment in response to
post
The shareholders can sell their shares. But it's an insolvent company being bailed out, so it'd be a tuppence.
If they wanted their investments to last they should've invested in a successful company, not a failing one.
comment in response to
post
The lobbying money they've accepted and the shares they likely have
comment in response to
post
They'd have to give up the lobbying freebies and future jobs they billionaires will offer them. Remember Clegg? Sold students out and ended up with a million pound job at Facebook.
You have to vote for those who aren't for sale, those that are for sale only listen to you until you cast your vote.
comment in response to
post
Forget Labour, they are beyond saving.