cchapman.bsky.social
Researcher, psychologist. Author "Quantitative User Experience Research" (w/Rodden), "R | Python for Marketing Research and Analytics" (w/Feit & Schwarz). Previously 24 yrs @ Google, Amazon, Microsoft. Personal account.
Blog at https://quantuxblog.com
353 posts
762 followers
383 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
That might support the claim about R at universities ... or OTOH it may suggest that unis are getting folks ready to use R in industry. (The books concern R/Python in marketing analytics.)
comment in response to
post
As to claims that R will leave "industry" and return to academia ... I'm not sure those can be cleanly distinguished.
One of my books has an R edition and a Python one. The R one sells more & is used in 100s of uni courses. I know of 160 syllabi using the R edition, vs 1 using the Python edition.
comment in response to
post
As well as the "long-standing history and tradition" of collapsing in the desert.
comment in response to
post
Bad facts make bad law. (Or some translation thereof into UX space.)
comment in response to
post
Literally 8 minutes ago, my wife asked when I would be "generally free" to deal with some dog appointments.
Of course I said, "Uh, what do you mean by 'generally'?"
(OTOH generally I do not recommend asking that! π)
comment in response to
post
Great summary of the incoherence!
Just as many animals are intelligent, I imagine computers (probably not LLMs) could be 'intelligent' someday. And also unlike humans. Yet all evidence is that it is a distant possibility.
Meanwhile we should focus on what dominant powers are doing with LLMs.
comment in response to
post
+100. A while back, I wrote a moderately "technical" (psych & philosophy) post about how we don't even know what AGI is: quantuxblog.com/were-far-fro...
comment in response to
post
Good point! (I'm also an advocate for embedded, product-specific analytics teams and there is an interaction for sure. But that also "depends" ...like everything in DS π)
comment in response to
post
Similar. IMO intake processes create work and don't solve the underlying problem, which I see as being about stakeholder relationships.
If a team has good relationships, intake happens automatically. If not, intake won't fix them.
I can imagine good uses ... just haven't observed them, my 0.02!
comment in response to
post
Same! π
Side note. I was talking yesterday about a particular package that was last updated in 2014 and still runs perfectly. Base R.
I contrasted tidy code (not mine) from 2024 that now hopelessly fails and I have no idea why (changes related to purrr??)
Anyway, great piece! π
comment in response to
post
My FAVORITE joke about the moon landing conspiracy theories is, "They hired Stanley Kubrick to fake the first moon landing, but he was such a stickler for detail that they had to film on location."
comment in response to
post
Outrageous slander, I say!
I prefer Star Trek stickers π
comment in response to
post
Correction ... maybe the right math is that I made it 5.3 years until now, hard to calculate even that at the moment π·
comment in response to
post
This is what I don't get about most of the success stories for LLMs.
There is no particular lack in the world of boring books, mediocre art, code for yet-another-app, error-ridden reports, internet search results, superficial data analyses, etc.
Sure, AI makes "more" but do we need that?
comment in response to
post
Full blog - you should *absolutely* read it deplet.ing/the-copilot-...
I also find these AI tools helpful when itβs doing the routine task Iβve done many times and can do it with eyes closed
Butβ¦ itβs not helpful when I want to build something GREAT that is elegant, and better than before
comment in response to
post
Same thought about buying/return (although in Seattle we do have a reasonable mix of Yamaha & Roland models in shops. The Montage plays great, for $$$!)
OTOH I mostly play an acoustic piano, so digital models all challenge me.
comment in response to
post
Have you played one live? Would definitely recommend that (for any piano, not specifically about the Numa in any way). And if so, would love to hear a report.
Anyway, following!