chris.sigint.life
Incident management specialist. Fan of wolves. Political junkie and IR nerd. 🇳🇴🇪🇸🇬🇧
242 posts
200 followers
274 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Sell out any dignity you may have left to get a slightly positive statement from a guy who is just going to go home, have Stephen Miller talk in his ear, and then go on TV and say some random shit about how Spain should have invaded Iran if they want NATO protection
comment in response to
post
Everyone's kissing his ass and he still won't say that he will uphold Article 5 commitments or commit to regularised trade relations. Placating him doesn't help, it's just humiliating and cowardly.
comment in response to
post
Seeing it’s been confirmed now. Disgusting.
comment in response to
post
What sort of app is this supposed to be? It looks off and inconsistent. Nothing I’ve come across before.
I wouldn’t put it past them fluffing something up, at least. But if this is Rutte verbatim, it is pathetic and disqualifying.
comment in response to
post
Extremely non interventionist
comment in response to
post
"A rallying cry from the first crusade" tends to attract a certain kind of person, however.
comment in response to
post
"The other side is the real evil" is certainly a take when you’re defending a theocratic oppressive regime that is funding and fomenting terrorism around the world (yes, including against Israelis) and supporting Russia. Do you have any concept at all of what Iran is and does?
comment in response to
post
Det her er bare skikkelig trist. Og vedtatt uten et fnugg av bevis på at det gjør landet tryggere, snarere tvert imot.
Jeg spør som alltid: hva er det som gjør at politiet sentralt i London klarer jobben uten våpen, mens de må ha det på Jæren?
comment in response to
post
Enjoying the implication Musk had no problem with working with Trump knowing he was in the Epstein files until they fell out.
comment in response to
post
Find some superillas. The one just up from Tetuan or in Sant Antoni is a good start. Busy roads turned into human-first places.
comment in response to
post
Something that came up for me that wasn’t discussed is second order stuff. A data transfer to eg. Meta isn’t counted, but isn’t it counted in their ~$150bn revenue largely based on that data? And wouldn’t "invisible" productivity gains in eg banking appear in that you had a free hour to get a pint?
comment in response to
post
Det blir litt patetisk når noen, selv en statsborger, kan ta penger ut av næringsdrift i et fiendtlig og gjennomsanksjonert land og pløye det inn i norsk valgkamp. Virker som noe ganske grunnleggende lovverket burde beskytte mot.
comment in response to
post
I am correct in my statement for all instances regarding any LLM.
comment in response to
post
That's just not true. As I said: there are many things you can do to lower the risk of hallucinations, but it fundamentally cannot be eliminated no matter what you do. That's *intrinsic to how they work*. There's absolutely no way around that.
comment in response to
post
There are several ways to limit the risk of providing false citations, but there is fundamentally no way to *guarantee* that an LLM will only use and provide real citations.
comment in response to
post
That's the common sense approach, but that's not what it says. If that was the case then guidance would read "is able to exclude" or similar. What it says is that if you choose the protected group of men in a club, you must do so consistently which because of the ruling means excluding trans men.
comment in response to
post
I'm not sure how else to read this: "a gay men-only association should not admit trans men"
comment in response to
post
Amongst all the absurdity, this seems completely nuts if I'm reading it correctly – that a club for gay men is not allowed to be trans inclusive
comment in response to
post
He was very unpopular after his first term too but American voters wiped their memories some time in 2021
comment in response to
post
Private building is quite clearly down as well, against a faster population increase. And I doubt the 60s was a paradise of simple permitting.
comment in response to
post
Bannon is a convicted fraudster. He lies for profit. Not sure why you – anyone in the media – bother giving him the time of day.
comment in response to
post
I choose to believe that many traders collectively tried to trigger the circuit break so they could take 15 for a coffee and a smoke. Just didn’t quite work.
comment in response to
post
Dammit after leaving Twitter I almost forgot David Sacks existed until now
comment in response to
post
Teased me with a halt and then went back up :(
comment in response to
post
Donald Trump is not a complex thinker, that much should be obvious. People seem to love hunting for complex theories to explain what he's doing, when things usually fit neatly into a very simple explanation: he's a bit of an idiot.
Yeah, he just likes tariffs.
comment in response to
post
Listened, subscribed!
Worth mentioning n discussing the huge effort in onshoring that for a lot of stuff the tariffs, even if long term, won't be remotely close to enough. Like, Norway has 3-500% tariffs + heavy subsidies to protect agriculture. Taxing away comparative advantage is a fool's errand.
comment in response to
post
Honestly seems like the market overreacted back up. Still a full on trade war going on with China and nothing is resolved with anyone else.