chris3y.bsky.social
Horseshoe theorist and armchair psychologist. Reckless hedonist and disaffected malcontent.
Currently build software for money but would consider outer-space stuff.
(I don’t know who Jesse Singal is and don’t follow him.)
🇬🇧🇺🇦🇪🇺
Proud Furryphobe.
1,164 posts
211 followers
282 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Now it makes sense, thanks.
comment in response to
post
Do you have specific examples?
Particularly in the case of Islam, “doubt” was heavily practiced.
I understand Chinese medicine was a lot of tradition and faith but not much of that is considered “valuable” today.
I don’t think you can really separate “science” from “doubt” but happy to be wrong.
comment in response to
post
How is that a “scientific” discovery?
comment in response to
post
“Don’t believe your lying eyes”.
comment in response to
post
Can you provide any examples of valuable scientific discoveries that didn’t involve basic skepticism or doubt?
comment in response to
post
There’s now a recommended lint rule to enforce this.
Also if you still have some class based components, the same applies to lifecycle functions (you shouldn’t set stats in there either).
If you ignore these rules, your components will be far more complex than they need to be.
comment in response to
post
- Me, explaining to the tester who’s just going to tell the product owner anyway.
comment in response to
post
He meant, “ask a progressive”.
comment in response to
post
I feel like “famine in Gaza” has been “imminent” for 18 months at this point.
There might really be a wolf this time but can we at least start our cries for help by conceding the previous times were false alarms?
comment in response to
post
My girlfriend of 20 years was raped by her own father from the age of 13 and he was never convicted, the police didn’t even try to contact some witness we gave them.
This case has fuck all to do with that. Neither does my “engagement”.
Cringe.
comment in response to
post
Not sure why you’re making it personal… but I can guess.
This case has nothing to do with a lack of rape convictions. It’s an absurd non-sequitur.
comment in response to
post
Weird attempt at saving face but ok.
comment in response to
post
But you’re ok with imprisoning people for simply writing words on Facebook? Even though… <picks random unrelated crime> domestic abuse is hard to prosecute?!
(See how I can reduce the matter down to an absurd degree too?)
It was a beloved natural landmark on a legally protected site. Shit take.
comment in response to
post
Would you extend the same leniency to the non-Mensa members who said dumb shit on social media during the Southport riots?
Just curious where you draw the line.
comment in response to
post
Let these idiot vandals off-easy with a senseless crime because rape is hard to convict?
What has one thing got to do with the other?
comment in response to
post
You’d realise it was actually true if you used a higher percentage of your brain.
comment in response to
post
So you’re saying we need a TV billionaire from New York to fix things… right?
comment in response to
post
So what you’re saying is, immigrants and the Ukraine war caused these price rises?
comment in response to
post
Lmao
comment in response to
post
Weapons grade copium.
comment in response to
post
Severance vibes.
comment in response to
post
Imagine putting some cringey TERF on the same list as the oligarch and dictator.
Get a grip.
comment in response to
post
He’s such a weasel and pseudo-intellectual dipshit.
comment in response to
post
Brexit is a strong contender but… yeah Trump is worse.
comment in response to
post
Caroline Leavitt… is that you?
comment in response to
post
Go on…
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
He’s clearly a lying grifter but at least his message is a good one (for now).
comment in response to
post
Great take. It’s slowed down a lot but that finale was excellently handled and arguably a highlight of the entire series.
comment in response to
post
One word: “Loyalist”
Want two? “Weak opposition”.