However, as scientists we are highly allergic to Type 1 errors. We prefer to not say whether human-caused climate change was involved until we have extremely precise data in the published literature we can cite. As a result, we often commit Type 2 errors. A good discussion of this bias here:

No doubt. It’s really hard on almost impossible to reduce global warming pollution without a carbon price. Too bad people were duped by the onslaught of disinformation canada.citizensclimatelobby.org/14504-2/

Do you have the empirical data, costs and case studies to back this up or is this just your humble opinion?