coolspeech.bsky.social
Legal disclaimer: This account is not run by nor associated with Peter Navarro, who is and always will be a ridiculous man.
1,665 posts
262 followers
441 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Exactly. I think he probably likes what Trump is doing to New York, hence the “nothing to see here” scolding.
comment in response to
post
You sound like a waste of time. Maybe you like what Trump said. Is that it? Get a fucking clue or get lost.
comment in response to
post
Eat a bag of dicks. Enjoy retirement with your good friend Bob Menéndez. Sucker. Weenie. Scab. I will tell everyone who will listen what a fucking disgrace you are. Goldman Sacks ass drip.
comment in response to
post
Fuck you.
comment in response to
post
My point is that in your example the person made statements that are provably false. A plaintiff politician cannot prove they weren’t actually lying in the same way that someone can prove they are a boy not a woman-fraudster. Thank you for what you do.
comment in response to
post
📌
comment in response to
post
If people avoided using the term lie except where there was direct evidence the person lied, they’d only be able to use it when the liar admitted that they lied. That’s absurd, but I don’t doubt that’s the frame many journos use.
comment in response to
post
That’s pretty different as you describe it since, among other things, the child’s family could obviously prove she was a child. When pols/billionaires lie, there’s usually little doubt what they said is false, only a nagging feeling of “who knows what was in his head,” which shouldn’t be a bar.
comment in response to
post
All of whom are entitled to taxpayer-funded hearings on the denial of their benefits.
comment in response to
post
I like how the border agents in this hypo are acting like they’re up by one in the final seconds of a basketball game trying to keep the baby out rather than acting the way ethical people would when a mother goes into labor.
comment in response to
post
Dictator shit.
comment in response to
post
Politics isn’t astrophysics or structural engineering. It doesn’t need to be so professionalized.
comment in response to
post
And if anything, I wish the @democrats.org would make a concerted effort to listen to the better ideas (not mine) shared on here by historians, scientists, etc. Bluesky is not a representation of the public, but it should be a resource.
comment in response to
post
Maybe as amici.
comment in response to
post
Seems like they don’t even try to persuade the court
comment in response to
post
What dumb reasoning. Because the former U.S. attorney said some things? Ok…
comment in response to
post
Sandcastle mentality. They feel powerful destroying things.
comment in response to
post
Did that follow him at all?
comment in response to
post
📌
comment in response to
post
Not for nothing, but the Tea Party was extremely successful as a political movement. I am an active voter/donor/volunteer, and I am here for it!
comment in response to
post
Does WHCA have the power to do that?
comment in response to
post
Give this man a farm to retire to. Who’s got the fire in their belly and lives in his district?
comment in response to
post
🤯
comment in response to
post
Thank you. Annoying how readily some concede that there’s significant bloat in federal workforce. I mean, there’s always room for improvement, but the feds are extremely capable and work for us at a bargain.
comment in response to
post
Drunk guy who mouths off at some toughs at a bar and demands to “take it outside” only to run away: avoided a fight
comment in response to
post
Also, could seed the ground with paid media at a time like now, build goodwill, work on issues, etc.
comment in response to
post
Probable cause of felony child predation? Pardon ✅
www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...
comment in response to
post
I mean, we do want the American people to know that Trump owns this 100%. Jeffries has said Dems are willing to vote against keeping the government open, so he knows he has some power.
comment in response to
post
So Trump can demolish a federal agency at the whim of his billionaire donor, but he thinks he needs a bill (law) to buy updated safety equipment? What a turd burglar.