cybrogtribe.bsky.social
The only human things that can thrive in a world of AIs are cyborgs.
593 posts
71 followers
126 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
All of the EVs have great longevity. Fewer moving parts. Used EVs are the clearly best cars to buy right now.
comment in response to
post
That GitHub repo is quite something. It was a hacky PoC that was making critical decisions.
comment in response to
post
My question is what Thiel is doing right now?
comment in response to
post
Evergreen
clickhole.com/heartbreakin...
comment in response to
post
Have you watched this yet? I call it a zeitgeist
youtu.be/7a_wOgXrHn8?...
comment in response to
post
Two things are true.
1. If they did things as you intend, this would be good.
2. They wouldn’t, and instead make private cars.
comment in response to
post
“Yes and”
comment in response to
post
The best criticism I’ve heard is basically “but wealth inequality is a bigger issue” and I’m petty much “yes and”ing it all.
comment in response to
post
Maybe I’m confused about your post here. Are you saying the post has “dismissal”? I don’t read that. Or are you saying the foil he uses is dismissive? That’s generally how foils work in writing.
But I do think it is roughly accurate and I’d love to see some actually good AI critique!
comment in response to
post
That sociopath’s face should be everywhere
comment in response to
post
Yes, definitely misleading. Though if you just did “fossil fuels vs renewables” it would still look pretty good.
comment in response to
post
Yeah. If you did total fossil fuels they still would be moving in the right direction, and doing better than most countries. We need to be realistic but still acknowledge even partial victories.
comment in response to
post
Hah. Very similar to US PhD, but up until now the deal was that the government top line put huge amounts into the underlying research and researchers were happy to take that trade.
comment in response to
post
Thanks. I assumed it had to be something like that or nuclear. It is still a good thing! I don’t think people realize how much credibility they loose when they play funny games with numbers
comment in response to
post
What’s the other 51%?
comment in response to
post
Why are there two of them?
comment in response to
post
What would you consider autentico?
comment in response to
post
The sad way to square that circle is being a pro-apocalypse death cult.
comment in response to
post
"CRT does not define racism in the traditional manner as solely the consequence of discrete irrational bad acts perpetrated by individuals but is usually the unintended (but often foreseeable) consequence of choices"
— Janel George, Director of the Racial Equity in Education Law and Policy Clinic
comment in response to
post
It is probably too much semantics and I get what you mean. But what you are after is that they didn’t INTEND to vote for this, and they did vote for this. Ignorance is never an excuse, just an explanation.
comment in response to
post
I believe it is pronounced “enhanced analysis”
comment in response to
post
Tbf, his argument in that famous memo was basically “you are breaking laws, just not laws recognized by the United States”
This points to my most wonkish post Trump reform: repeal the ASPA
comment in response to
post
Someone needs to start a prediction market on his dumb shit if they haven’t already
comment in response to
post
I found this. If anyone has more color to add I’d love to see it.
www.britannica.com/topic/Worces...
comment in response to
post
I’d love to know more about the Supreme Court case related to this. I couldn’t find it in the original link. Please share!
comment in response to
post
But they aren’t our best people.
comment in response to
post
I’m curious how you see the perfect vs the good. Do you see more “politics takes strange bedfellows” or “It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority”?
comment in response to
post
But numbers fuck, right?
comment in response to
post
It is pronounced “viziers”
comment in response to
post
Laize-faire for companies and bureaucracies for people.
comment in response to
post
I did. It didn’t. It fact it specifically refutes it. Shocked, I tell you.
comment in response to
post
He explicitly talks about state capacity, not private enterprise. If you want to be relevant at least learn to read.
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/matt...
Also, A+ burn
comment in response to
post
This makes it clear you don’t understand the difference between the framing/language of an argument and the substance of an argument.
Eg, yes people like “liberty” and hate “regulation” but it is a basic undeniable fact that the EPA has been the most liberty-creating organization of the last 80 yr
comment in response to
post
I think there’s something connecting this and the dumb Yglesias tweet. There is a huge gap between the language/framing of the argument and the substance of the argument.
comment in response to
post
TIL you also have a 3 yr old
comment in response to
post
I get that he does go into that, but the framing is just all wrong, and allows people to do things like that terrible synopsis.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, and it twists words almost to their breaking point. There are lots of people that care, for example, about the genetic differences between racial groups that lead to different health outcomes, and how much those are studied.
comment in response to
post
The piece linked is not serious journalism.
www.nytimes.com/2018/03/23/o...
comment in response to
post
“Reasonable accommodation” is such an under appreciated standard.
comment in response to
post
Dirty Grandpa
comment in response to
post
Andor was so good I wanted to rewatch Rouge One …
Poor choice.
comment in response to
post
Truth. Also ….