danielnazer.bsky.social
Senior IP & Product Counsel at Mozilla. Previously EFF and some other stuff. Personal Account.
68 posts
169 followers
157 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
I guess AI is also great for creating slop with misleading titles and author names to spam Amazon listings with but I don't think that's really the market harm that Judge Chhabria has in mind.
comment in response to
post
100%.
I sure ain't buying/reading any AI-written biographies. That sounds excruciating.
AI can do an okay job of spitting out a few paragraphs of biographical summary but it's nowhere near creating BOOKS that people would want to read (though maybe it will help with drafting mediocre books).
comment in response to
post
Why would it be a surprise that the best movie since 2000 placed highly on a list of best movies since 2000?
comment in response to
post
Bonus: Post this on Threads and get 3.9MM replies telling you hotdog plants aren’t real. Sell those for $1.
comment in response to
post
Many tales from this book stayed with me: www.bloomsbury.com/us/leningrad...
especially stories of Jewish people not fleeing east because they assumed Soviet propaganda was wildly exaggerated (usually a reasonable assumption) only to discover that the Nazis were even worse than Stalin said.
comment in response to
post
I have a friend who is prone to sharing left-leaning misinfo on social media ... she also posts a lot of stories of conservatives arrested for sex crimes & these usually turn out to be from credible sources. It's kind of weird that the most disturbing / shocking stuff she posts is the most reliable.
comment in response to
post
Feels like "not editorial content" is pretty thin when this isn't an ad -- it's in your paper and you should be responsible for it.
"Someone else wrote 60 pages of AI slop and we put it in our paper" isn't a valid excuse.
comment in response to
post
The dog breeding equivalent of pouring an espresso shot in a tall glass of redbull and then dropping a 200 mg caffeine pill in there.
comment in response to
post
Here's the judge's written TRO blocking the targeting of Jenner storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
comment in response to
post
Citing Trump's attack on Jenner's pro bono work for transgender people and immigrants, Judge Bates notes: "Our legal system relies on lawyers who advocate zealously for all clients."
comment in response to
post
Very happy to see Jenner & Block and WilmerHale have sued the administration. Notable that WilmerHale had a 63 page complaint ready to go within 24 hours of the EO.
Props also to Cooley for representing Jenner.
I co-counseled with WH a couple of times and was always impressed by their work.
comment in response to
post
/2 Effective defiance and subversion of fascism requires lots of Rachel Cohens and lots of people observing what happens to them. I’ve made fun of Skadden for as long as I knew what it was, and I’m a critic of BigLaw, but I support and applaud her for standing up. Be Rachel Cohen, not Paul Weiss.
comment in response to
post
The main thing is whether the judge struck his her gavel against a wooden sounding board with a loud and satisfying "thwack!"
comment in response to
post
Yeah, and they were tinkering with parallel processing in the 1940s en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atanaso...
comment in response to
post
He quite possibly did, it was just one proclamation (doesn’t change how insane the current rant is)