danmax802.bsky.social
Adaptively nonconformist. Standoffishly approachable. Contains multitudes.
*insert associative descriptor/acronym/flag here*
887 posts
209 followers
99 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Cool, now don't adjust those figures for inflation—see how much they actually delivered in real terms
comment in response to
post
More insane was anyone who allowed those two to be in such prominent positions without expecting this to happen
comment in response to
post
Tbf I wouldn't put much stock in the judgment of a man who got cucked by Elon Musk
comment in response to
post
All of this because Trump realised that he couldn't use the withdrawal of federal funding to bully California
If you can't bully them, burn it to the ground, I guess?
comment in response to
post
I swear this all sounds so familiar
comment in response to
post
The CliffNotes: Trump called Musk a liar, Musk called Trump a pedo
comment in response to
post
That's unfair, I'm sure Peter Thiel isn’t involved in anything shady
www.advocate.com/peter-thiel/...
comment in response to
post
“Going at it” was a choice of phrasing…
comment in response to
post
“Mighty President Trump deports Vile Illegal convicted of narcotics-related offenses, sedition and…terrorism, I guess?”
comment in response to
post
Trump rn:
comment in response to
post
Approached for comment Mr. Musk said “We’re not going back”
comment in response to
post
We’re literally back to where we were in 2017, with a lil’ extra fascism
comment in response to
post
At least the nuclear glow will cook the popcorn
comment in response to
post
We’re literally three posts away from
Trump calling Musk “Rocketman” and ICE kicking his door in
comment in response to
post
When I tell you, I am HOWLING
comment in response to
post
How fast would a nuke cook your popcorn?
comment in response to
post
The Unholy Triumvirate with more bitching and fascism
comment in response to
post
Corn subsidies in the Midwest would've been a real good idea for simulating the economy ngl
comment in response to
post
Trump didn't know Epstein!
He just lived next door…and rode on his plain…and partied on his private island…and was photographed with him numerous times.
comment in response to
post
I would say work’ll be there in the morning but…maybe not, given how things are going
comment in response to
post
Nothing to do with the DOD’s DUI hire, Secretary Hegseth and his history with SA allegations, I'm sure.
comment in response to
post
What this whole saga shows is that the Administration thinks that the Executive holds a higher authority than the Judiciary.
Maybe they need reminded that that’s not the case?
comment in response to
post
Let? He’s not just letting him sit in CECOT, he’s paying (or rather you are) for the privilege of having Abrego Garcia’s human rights violated.
www.latintimes.com/el-salvadora...
comment in response to
post
Me when I lie:
comment in response to
post
Translation:
comment in response to
post
Damn, this really is just gonna be Grassley vs. McConnell: Battle of the Geriatrics
comment in response to
post
The Defense Secretary and National Security Advisor can share military secrets on Signal but American personnel can’t get laid overseas?
For shame.
comment in response to
post
What? You mean exercising their constitutional rights?
comment in response to
post
The irony is that one US company: Nike has nearly 50% of their production, across 155 factories in Vietnam. That’s just one company.
This is going to be the greatest act of economic self harm since…y’know…
comment in response to
post
The fact that four Republicans are rebelling against Trump in this should spell enough trouble, never mind the fact that Paul was one of the co-sponsors of the anti-tariff bill.
comment in response to
post
So…he issued retaliatory tariffs on US territories. He’s an actual one-man trade war.
comment in response to
post
Not only did four Republicans defect on this, Rand Paul was one of the co-sponsors of the bill
comment in response to
post
If you don’t do politics, politicians will do you
comment in response to
post
Notice how they’re exclusively threatening countries without Armed Forces of their own?
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
TS/SCI: Text or Signal/Share Classified Information
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
From serfdom to TERFdom
comment in response to
post
Breaking: the head of Senate Intelligence is in deep with Agent Orange
comment in response to
post
Why don’t you ask his Accountiblity Partner AKA porn buddy, y’know…his son?
comment in response to
post
Couldn’t even say it could be good or bad for fear of what the negative imagery would do to Tesla’s stock
comment in response to
post
I give them 36 hours.
comment in response to
post
Well, he’s not wrong there. It will be *unprecedented*
comment in response to
post
Nothing makes a landscape look better than a big plume of smoke
comment in response to
post
Breaking News: NSA Mike Waltz has accidentally smuggled 28 Chinese spies into the Pentagon
comment in response to
post
An act of terrorism to not have tears in your eyes while you speak