Profile avatar
davetherocker.bsky.social
Elder millennial. Musician. Writer. Space lover. 🩷💜💙 Burn it all down and start over.
56 posts 219 followers 29 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
OMG I'VE BEEN SAYING THIS FOR YEARS!
comment in response to post
That's a lot of words to say that they've been brainwashed and willfully keep themselves that way.
comment in response to post
That's what i mean. They won't attack.
comment in response to post
Agreed, but a threat from N Korea won't be one of the things he uses to justify.
comment in response to post
His plans to try and do martial law will have nothing to do with N Korea. They threaten to attack us like at least once a year
comment in response to post
I'm not having any fun. My career is in the balance. I'm trying to warn you that this is not a shruggable matter. People like you who live in a remote are will be SIGNIFICANTLY affected.
comment in response to post
Regardless, it would very much change if it were a private company. Your two carriers would go away, your entire post office would go away, and you would likely have to drive all the way to somewhere like El Cajon.
comment in response to post
Pine valley post office has one or two delivery routes. Meaning they have one or 2 carriers who go house to house and deliver. Yeah I'm not sure why you would argue with someone with access to USPS info.
comment in response to post
So from what I can glean without diving in super deep, pine valley California has 1 or maybe 2 routes. Meaning that it does in fact, get delivery.
comment in response to post
I can check my internal programs. What city do you live in?
comment in response to post
Unless your area has limited access you are getting delivery. Unless you have terrain that prevents postal vehicles from making that journey, you are getting delivery. There are no large chunks of the population that are not able to get delivery.
comment in response to post
Actually a lot of rural places rely on the mail aspect of the postal service. They don't have reliable internet and mail is the only way to get things and pay bills. So.
comment in response to post
Hey, since that guy blocked me, let him know: When I say "you" I'm very clearly talking about the people who refused to vote since.. that's who we were talking about. Obviously someone who doesn't understand the nuance of voting wouldn't understand that either.
comment in response to post
Hey bud. It's called context clues. We are very clearly talking about the people who did not vote for her. And since he are talking about them, using the word "you" is like I'm hypothetically talking to them. Not surprised you can't understand that, since you can't understand how our voting works.
comment in response to post
They'll decide hey, let's actually annex Gaza for beach front property. And by not voting for the people who are the lesser of the evils, YOU VOTED FOR THIS.
comment in response to post
No. What's stupid is thinking that by not voting for Harris, you weren't voting for genocide. When in reality, because of our outdated 2 party system, a non vote, is a vote for the other side. And the other side not only will continue to fund the genocide, they'll take off the guard rails.
comment in response to post
Trump just said he wants the US to take over Gaza after the Palestinians are "relocated" so. Maybe it was the fault of the people who didn't understand that in terms of the middle east, Harris was the better option.
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
My problem is, when I force myself to write like that, I end up rewriting those pages/words. Do you find yourself having that problem?
comment in response to post
How do you keep yourself writing on a regular basis? I struggle hard with this.
comment in response to post
They said official acts can't be charged. They did not say the insurrection was an official act. They did say, states couldn't be the ones to litigate the 14th ammendment
comment in response to post
No they didn't.
comment in response to post
Come on cholesterol, HURRY UP
comment in response to post
Didn't the state Supreme Court rule against him?
comment in response to post
No... we weren't. You commented on a thread about the postal service within the comments section of a post. It's right there. Just scroll up. Here, I'll show you.
comment in response to post
We weren't talking about that though. Is this your first day on the internet?
comment in response to post
...what? Are you replying too the wrong person? I was commenting on mail in ballots and mail carriers.
comment in response to post
This absolutely did not happen.
comment in response to post
They are very subjective, and the committee changes their mind over and over. But they are telling us they value getting to the conf championship OVER head to head and that is so dumb
comment in response to post
The fact that Penn state did not drop below OSU is fucking WILD
comment in response to post
Based on that projection, I doubt it now
comment in response to post
Yeah that can be an issue, but Texas only lost one game. The others lost 2-3 so it doesn't matter who played who at that point
comment in response to post
Not if these analysts are right with their projections. But the only way in my opinion a 3 loss team gets in is if Texas loses to a 3 loss team in the champ. But even then the 3 loss team would be ranked too low I think
comment in response to post
I mean shit CLEMSON might be back in consideration
comment in response to post
Hahaha i was just about to find our thread and be like welp. Guess Texas can lose to a&m now lol. Holy shit i wonder how the rankings shake up. No way they let 9-3 teams in if there's enough 1-2 loss teams in the P4
comment in response to post
The clearest dark sky I've ever seen was driving through the WV mountains. Literally could see the milky way.
comment in response to post
Got this pic in the NorCal mountains earlier this year on my phone (some light editing to make it more accurate to what our eyes were seeing)
comment in response to post
The party of "alphas" dropping their pants and bending over for the authoritarian.
comment in response to post
Yeah dems are so good at cheating but just forgot to do it while in power? Do you have even one brain cell?
comment in response to post
#3 Georgia literally dropped 9 spots when they lost their second game. And Georgia beat Texas. You can disagree with the facts, but you'd be wrong lol.
comment in response to post
This is not making assumptions. This is playing out the scenario at hand. If Texas loses, they will be out. Period.
comment in response to post
Look at this bracket. Tennessee is currently first out. And if everything else stays the same, Texas gets dropped for Tennessee. And once the SEC champ loser has 3 losses that opens up A&M
comment in response to post
You're missing the point that they have the worst schedule of any SEC team in consideration at this point. They will absolutely drop that far, as the committee has shown us. Look how fat the other teams who have lost dropped. They will be the first team out.
comment in response to post
They'll drop to like 11th or 12th. Which doesn't matter. cause playoff seeds have little to do with rank. 4 go to conf champs, 1 goes to group of 5, so you have 7 spots left. And if UT loses, there will be 5 two loss SEC non champs, 3 B1G non champs, & ND to choose from. UT has the weakest schedule.
comment in response to post
I pulled my back so bad I had to call off work the next day by... adjusting how I was sitting in my chair.