david.klamet.net
Renaissance man wannabe, drone builder, night sky watcher, hummingbird feeder.
Like Diogenes, looking for honest people.
Slava Ukraini
297 posts
99 followers
18 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
... and, I guess:
3. Depending on answer to 2, how long will those in charge remain so.
comment in response to
post
The truth is, we don't know...and we don't know what we don't know.
It is important, I think, to realize that the outcome depends on decisions made by humans. So there are two questions.
1. What will AI be able to do?
2. How will those "in charge" use these abilities?
comment in response to
post
That China didn't get lowered tariffs (and didn't push for them?) makes me think that they believe exports to Europe and the rest of the world are more important.
comment in response to
post
From the replies to this post, I'm even more pessimistic about the future of BlueSky and the future of the U.S.
Yelling and insulting (even though I'm plenty mad at them) the people you disagree with will never cause change.
Do you want things to change or do you want to always be right?
comment in response to
post
Fucking Dangerous!!
comment in response to
post
Amazing how your respect for someone (Hank Green) can be wiped out in a moment.
Didn't think that was the kind of person you were.
comment in response to
post
I am no fan of the Democrats or of Kamala Harris. They have been the "don't shake things up" party. We would have had more of the same.
Right now, though, that is looking pretty good.
comment in response to
post
I'm not into conspiracy theories, but if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck.... IT'S A DUCK!
comment in response to
post
I certainly don't want to be right, but I am fearful that I am.
comment in response to
post
Symbolic gestures solve none of the catastrophic problems we face. If the democrats don't learn that lesson, they are almost certainly doomed.
comment in response to
post
If TdA were as bad as they “determine,” wouldn’t there be widespread reports of “murders and kidnappings” from around the country? And wouldn’t the Govt’s case be stronger if they told the court about them? Finally, can courts take that lack of specific claims into account?
comment in response to
post
A European study about gender bias by teachers.
Contrary to my naive assumption that this was an American phenomenon.
cepr.org/voxeu/column...
comment in response to
post
Why spread the anti-male agenda? Two separate female teachers, on two separate occasions, told me that middle school girls were the meanest students they encountered.
That is just anecdotal; I recognize it as such.
Does this make a positive difference?
If it's meant as a joke, it's not funny.
comment in response to
post
Thank you for a polite and informative response.
comment in response to
post
I saw a summary of this paper. I didn't read down far enough.
Those that attribute that to malice... I'd always assumed there was no substantive difference on the subject.
I've been wrong a couple of times recently. I try to admit it when it happens.
www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcont...
comment in response to
post
I'm just asking a question, admitting limited understanding. So if you say I'm wrong, that sounds like bias.
The US supposedly has free speech, except for specific exceptions.
However, that is definitely not the case and has been under attack by both left and right for some time.
comment in response to
post
Yes.
I believe there was a time when we had noble goals. Things are never that simple.
Everybody makes mistakes. (Trump's actions aren't mistakes).
The Treaty of Versailles angered the Germans. Did it lead directly to the war? I'm sure scholars argue. But, they're mistakes of our ancestors.
comment in response to
post
I take that as meaning some people are not entitled to their opinions.
You're the one insulting me. I'm just asking questions.
comment in response to
post
I see. You're allowed your opinion, but I am not.
Is there a bit of SJW in you? Just asking politely.
So, I would like an answer. I am not allowed an opinion. Right?
comment in response to
post
I checked his profile and it said Londoner. No other info.
My response was unjustified. My opinion was not.
Did his response help those of us caught in this nightmare?
comment in response to
post
No one reads the posts when I said that Canada and Europe are/were our most important allies. Yes, I was wrong. No apology is possible now.
I stand by my belie,f but the vehemence with which I expressed it was over the top.
comment in response to
post
We must also acknowledge the US military budget is Ridiculous. We have more aircraft carriers than the rest of the world COMBINED. Europe sitting back and letting us achieve that dominance seems more than unwise.
With Russia on their doorstep, becoming reliant on them gas and oil seems foolish.
comment in response to
post
In this case, I admit to being a part of the problem and not a part of the solution. That is not "the me I want to be."
You are right, I was wrong.
comment in response to
post
I was wrong in the vehemence of my reply. I acknowledge that. However, many presented their opinions as facts. No one called them out.
You fail to comment on Europe's level of support for Ukraine. Europe has more to lose and they are just now planning an appropriate response.
comment in response to
post
You are right. I let my emotions get the best of me. I stand by my opinion, but the vehemence with which I expressed it was not representative of the person I want to be.
comment in response to
post
In this case, I mean anyone representing the government. That they (DHS/ICE) have started covering their faces is a dire warning to all of us.
Don't know if this is policy or if they're ashamed of what they're doing.
Jan 6 rioters were more dangerous than common criminals.
comment in response to
post
2/
I assume that, in practice, it is not a factor and I cite it only on principle.
www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcont...