Profile avatar
davidchild.bsky.social
In a perpetual search for a beach house.
732 posts 306 followers 686 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
It’s all just so piddling, isn’t it. Put up income tax you cowards.
comment in response to post
Yep. Altho mostly livid that Tiktok served me his vid, and then I sent it to friends and now I am discussing it here. And his was pretty race-/immigrant-/youth-focused content that just makes me so disappointed with it all.
comment in response to post
Indeed. And yet Robert Jenrick isn’t, as I understand, proposing any of them.
comment in response to post
There seems to me just a lot more obvious poverty than there was a while ago and it’s not just arrogant teenagers anymore but people whose lives depend on never paying for the transport they use.
comment in response to post
And so how do we fix it? I saw it today coming out of my local station: a man, probably not sober, or of a fixed abode chose the small lady next to me to walk behind. And it’s fixable how? He pays with his bag of crack? Or we penalise him by refusing him a place to live? Genuinely?
comment in response to post
It’s partly now cos am older and more aware but like okay fine she just about affords a one-bed in “lesser” UES but now buys a, what, $20m Gramercy townhouse? There’s a knowing extravagance to Deborah Vance that feels more “real” than theirs.
comment in response to post
It’s less that and more the massive and very “unworried” wealth of it. It kind of always was but the clothing is now a parody of itself.
comment in response to post
When compare to say Hacks it’s so lame and feels mega-outdated. But will watch nonetheless.
comment in response to post
I think it’s not uncommon if you use tomato puree as well. I do it sometimes but my palette is that refined to tell the difference.
comment in response to post
I know it’s different but if the video had shown him doing that to her the conversation would be very different now. That didn’t look like a friendly push.
comment in response to post
Oh 100%! Too fun! Drinking all the water today.
comment in response to post
Emptying the freezer so having sausage pasta here. The sauce has been in the oven for the past two hours. No booze as *heavy* weekend.
comment in response to post
I’ll leave that specific challenge for you to ponder.
comment in response to post
Yeah, you’re right, that’ll definitely work.
comment in response to post
Everyone is taxed currently. If they earn through PAYE or dividends or live here. Happy to raise the rates for any of those but taxing say 1,000 hyper-mobile people more isn’t going to make a tiny bit of difference to the many challenges we face. Taxing 40+ million people a bit more would tho.
comment in response to post
If you think we have enough billionaires happy to hand over a huge chunk of their wealth to us to make a tiny bit of difference to government revenues then I don’t know how to help you.
comment in response to post
Describe “genuinely rich”.
comment in response to post
That, some mash. And a pint pls.
comment in response to post
Undoubtedly for many it’s a struggle. But the narrative does seem baked in that “everything’s gone up”. BBC went to a food bank on the day of inflation announcement to ask people about how they felt about price rises, eg.
comment in response to post
The days I see the Tally Ho bus are good days.
comment in response to post
Oh I might have to go back in just to have a good cry. The speech she gives her before she goes onstage also.
comment in response to post
I think a recurring theme is people have a skewed few of their own wealth relative to others and if we genuinely taxed “wealth” (mostly people’s homes) there’d be poll tax level revolts among retired folk. Also, London + SE would even more fund the entire country.
comment in response to post
Yep, seems to me there are zero quick wins. Depressingly, so.
comment in response to post
I mean, I would be fine, say, adding a couple of pence on to basic rate coupled with adding 5p to additional rate (maybe even soften it by giving everyone a tax free allowance / removing the £100k child tax credit thing). But the idea that serious cash is raised from the uber wealthy is nonsense.
comment in response to post
I am okay if it’s just for headlines and it’s maybe 10-15% of those at the lower income scale that get it. But if it returns in full it’s a total nonsense.
comment in response to post
Yeah, I always say I’d love to run a wine bar / food place only when I didn’t need it to make money. Just a really great moneypit of a place that I adored being in (on the rare occasions I weren’t on a yacht / pj / beach somewhere.
comment in response to post
Yep. And I have sometimes say in theatres told a queue of women if the men’s toilets were empty if they wanted to go in and use them. Loads of clubs now just have urinals in one and cubicles elsewhere with shared sinks. Ally McBeal was way ahead of things.
comment in response to post
Yep, it’s a *mess*. Also, only nightclubs or posh hotels “police” loos, and no organisation is going to thank the government for forcing them to suddenly clarify gender once a successful legal case has been won where a company “failed” to provide their stated single sex space.
comment in response to post
The government is going to *have* to legislate to resolve it. Organisations are not going to be able to enact it and then there will be legal cases and it will be totally unworkable. Clarified, my eye.
comment in response to post
Yes. A sort of Hearstopper but for college kids. And not as radical. But fun and decent amount of nudity / sexiness.
comment in response to post
See also Over Compensating.
comment in response to post
Any sauce?