diretalks.bsky.social
Non-partisan political commentator, small time content creator.
Advocate of Democracy.
Linktree:
https://linktr.ee/NathanTaylorETA
A co-founder of the ETA
Join Us:
https://electiontruthalliance.org
714 posts
15,418 followers
33,006 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
We are grateful that Dr. Mebane has allowed for the ETA to share his working analysis with the public. The ETA will continue to collaborate with experts in election forensics to #VerifyTheVote
To access the analysis and high-level summary, click here: electiontruthalliance.org/mebane-pa-wo...
comment in response to
post
I think it’s telling you go around reposting yourself while attacking ETA.
You can’t keep harassing people and expect them to tolerate you?
comment in response to
post
You have an awful lot of time on your hands to go around attacking others?
This doesn’t seem productive.
comment in response to
post
I think this reveals your true colors.
You act like you’re here to help fight misinformation but are so bias you can’t even consider perhaps you’re wrong and there is concerns?
comment in response to
post
What if this isn’t misinformation and you’re fighting against the wrong people?
comment in response to
post
Ignore this R5 guy, he’s either a troll at this point or malicious.
He goes around harassing people all day, cannot understand any new information when given it, etc.
comment in response to
post
What’s funny is I’ve heard of people getting marked as spam for following a lot of the BlueSky starter packs.
I wish the label was more clear if it’s report based or some automated system.
comment in response to
post
I submitted an appeal
comment in response to
post
If you’re interested in supporting me personally here is my linktree.
Thank you all so much and you are wonderful!
linktr.ee/NathanTaylor...
comment in response to
post
🤔
comment in response to
post
I can tell you don’t actually care about engaging in discussion of data, and cannot accept basic data points.
There’s nothing we could ever say to address your concerns because you do not want to talk in good faith.
comment in response to
post
I appreciate the skepticism and we are working this as we speak.
We have upcoming meetings with the experts whose work we are utilizing.
comment in response to
post
These experts are referenced and their work is applied in our reports on our website, and there will be upcoming releases with further tests.
comment in response to
post
This is already being done and our reports are also being sent out to the experts we reference in our analysis.
We are pursuing lawsuits because of our concerns.
comment in response to
post
Yes this pattern is consistent with other election fraud concerns in European elections as per the work of Roman Udot, Klimek, Shpilkin, etc.
www.intellinews.com/data-analysi...
www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
www.france24.com/en/europe/20...
comment in response to
post
This statement is incorrect.
There is a hypothesis, there are tests that have been conducted on voting data and will continue to be reproduced and shared.
You can even do them yourself!
comment in response to
post
As mentioned, explain to me your argument in demographics having any effect in turnout to vote share?
comment in response to
post
Explain to me why candidate preference matters, why vote type matters, when there should be no correlation between turnout and vote share?
Demographics do not impact this analysis.
comment in response to
post
You understand that turnout is just another way of showing votes cast per precinct compared to total votes possible?
They should all reflect the same thing, no correlation.
comment in response to
post
In-fact I opted to send you data that refutes your claims about demographics somehow explaining away issues not based on demographics.
comment in response to
post
Line*
comment in response to
post
Perhaps a key word here is trends from precinct to precinct.
You will have variance, but for all or many precincts to shift in the same way?
comment in response to
post
The above post is claiming evidence of election fraud for 2020.
I haven't seen any public reports of the data released yet, but we have also looked at 2020 so we'll see how our reports differ very soon.
comment in response to
post
Cause division?
Data is data, and we'll see what the data says for 2020 independent of politics.