dmgallagher.bsky.social
Depressed optimist
264 posts
52 followers
122 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Real ones know
comment in response to
post
Go Birds
comment in response to
post
Preach, John.
comment in response to
post
"feels more productive"
Well who could argue against a well-reasoned thesis like that?
comment in response to
post
I heard in some areas they actually have to drink Prosecco instead of Champagne. Ew.
comment in response to
post
Also, the "few states" he references are more than a third of US states where about a quarter of the US population lives.
comment in response to
post
What the hell are "tounges"?
comment in response to
post
Weapons grade sarcasm even
comment in response to
post
This is a you problem. Probably 75% of my feed is sports.
comment in response to
post
We were the Blue Jays for a hot mid-century minute.
comment in response to
post
Straight class, that.
comment in response to
post
How is the whole "resigned his last elected office in disgrace" not a disqualifier? What's going on up there, NYC?
comment in response to
post
There's a reason the Silmarillion was published posthumously from drafts and notes. It was never intended, by Tolkien, to be the "actual book."
comment in response to
post
This is gonna be so good.
comment in response to
post
Damn. I thought it was madness all this time, and now you're stealing me there's a method?
comment in response to
post
Also wild because I'm pretty sure I've read before that Sgt. Pepper was directly influenced by Pet Sounds.
comment in response to
post
Guinness
comment in response to
post
Florida gonna Florida
comment in response to
post
"Bluesky's gonna love this one!" - Are you in middle school? This is a playground-taunt-ass post.
comment in response to
post
Superhero secret identity-ass names.
comment in response to
post
I thought they were solar-powered dresses? So we can be less dependent on fossil fuel fashion.
comment in response to
post
But again, who is providing those numbers and how were they determined?
comment in response to
post
Stunning!!
comment in response to
post
That's how you get "worse" in office, wielding all the power.
comment in response to
post
Do you honestly think we'd be where we are now if she was in the office instead of him?
comment in response to
post
No. We had one absolutely terrible person and one imperfect person.
comment in response to
post
Dang, that looks amazing.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
#nokings #philly
comment in response to
post
Man, if people understood this 9 months ago, we wouldn't be here.
comment in response to
post
Criminally underrepresented on this thread.
comment in response to
post
When these folks say "order over chaos," what they mean is "order over freedom." "Order at the cost of our Constitutional rights." "Order regardless of legal or moral obligations."
comment in response to
post
Why not?
comment in response to
post
Biggest challenge there is that letters and diary entries have specific, limited audiences (usually a single individual). The other types of communication you reference are intended for broad consumption.
comment in response to
post
Congrats on finding a way to make yourself even more insufferable. I didn't think it was possible, but you sure showed me.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
This reminds me of folks in my parents' generation who were so used to stores being named possessively for the families that owned them (Macy's, Woolworth's, etc) that they use the same convention for everything, like Best Buy's.
comment in response to
post
I first read that as "JFK feminism" and... that would also seem problematic?
comment in response to
post
There is no second wrong, though.
comment in response to
post
So. Fucking. Hard.
comment in response to
post
WTAF?
comment in response to
post
What I said was very clear. If you have to argue against things I didn't say, you don't really need to post at all. Just say stupid shit to yourself.
comment in response to
post
None of these stories discusses a child randomly walking down the street into a Pride event.
comment in response to
post
You have not provided any evidence that the situation presented in your initial claim is happening.
comment in response to
post
This was your claim: "It's absurd that a child walking randomly down the street and there happens to be a gay pride parade going on with naked men and women would see it."
None of these stories describe that situation.
comment in response to
post
I'm saying your single picture with no identifying information is not evidence that every year children walking down the street are exposed to naked people at Pride events.