Profile avatar
dnadam.bsky.social
human geneticist, queerdo, mystery solver, gentle giant, big ol’ nerd, ADHD-brained. He/him https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=aJKZ5RYAAAAJ&hl=en
52 posts 150 followers 178 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Double-grabbing the future with Frame-Perfect Policy
comment in response to post
If ‘cilia’ is allowed then ‘ciliate’ MUST be allowed too and yes I will die on this hill
comment in response to post
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... Great background section in this one too
comment in response to post
I am a Northwestern faculty impacted just how you describe. My research - including an active trial of cancer / cardiac disease prevention, part of a large national network - has been frozen, despite a notice of award for our renewal. Year 6 of a 6 year study. We are completely in the dark.
comment in response to post
That’s true about its origins - and we absolutely should work to reduce sugar consumption too - but fluoridation *works,* and is not associated with any risks to health, as this study comparing fluoridated and non-fluoridated regions in the UK clearly shows onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
comment in response to post
Ah yes, the r-squared must be around negative eleventy-q
comment in response to post
Every day is 100 days now
comment in response to post
“select colleges”
comment in response to post
This is why he’s gutting the National Human Genome Research Institute, which for years has worked to disrupt this awful pseudoscience of genetic determinism and to build the evidence and infrastructure for equitable genome-informed public health
comment in response to post
Brutalist Spite Library is my new indie band name
comment in response to post
They’re dismantling NHGRI
comment in response to post
www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...
comment in response to post
Titled “Return to Innocence” natch
comment in response to post
To them, professors are the enemy. Vance said it out loud years ago. They want to traumatize early career scientists like me into leaving academia altogether. They want to starve universities so that they must downsize and get rid of us.
comment in response to post
They messed with the global search feature. On nih.gov search for ‘genetics’ or ‘cancer’ …now try searching for ‘diversity’ or ‘gender’
comment in response to post
They’re just gonna feed this all into their own dumb LLM anyway so the more nonsense we flood this with, the dumber their bot’s answers will be
comment in response to post
Yup. And it’s not just probationary staff.
comment in response to post
It’s also clearly written by absolute morons, it takes 5 minutes on PubMed to figure out the prevalence of Rx for these meds
comment in response to post
She was a Quid. He was a Pro Quo. Coming this Valentine’s Day, experience their timeless New York love story
comment in response to post
The Canyons is a ‘masterpiece’ of Pure Camp, in the Sontag sense… e.g. to show text messages to the audience they invented an app (?) that ostensibly everyone in-film uses called ‘TexTV’ that displays all your texts on the TV for some reason
comment in response to post
How do we know he didn’t just take boatloads of data home on external drives to mess with for Musk in an ‘unofficial’ capacity?
comment in response to post
NHGRI has also removed much of their content on diversity - including fact sheets and recordings of workshops, e.g. www.genome.gov/about-genomi... www.genome.gov/27568220/feb...
comment in response to post
The NHGRI has also started removing content from their site, such as: www.genome.gov/about-genomi...
comment in response to post
comment in response to post
It has aged incredibly well and feels remarkably ahead of its time. I hope more folks read this, it deserves more attention!!
comment in response to post
Joan Roughgarden, “Evolution’s Rainbow” Equal parts naturalism, cultural history, and manifesto, written by a trans evolutionary biologist. An exploration of the inherent queerness of nature and a powerful argument that transphobia is truly a rejection of the beautiful diversity of nature
comment in response to post
I don’t want to quarrel either, but you should do some reading on the underlying tech and regulatory decisions here. Genotyping uses fluorescent oligo probes to detect specific predetermined alleles. not the same as sequencing. different sens/spec. not saying it’s inaccurate, but it’s less accurate.
comment in response to post
This is like saying ‘I acknowledge astrology is silly, but all I’m saying is that telescopes show the real sky’ (Genotyping does not require a sequencing step, btw)
comment in response to post
1. 23andMe is not a sequencing test. It is a genotyping test. 2. 23andMe didn’t change the test. They (successfully) lobbied to change the rules.
comment in response to post
On top of that, the range of color values we label with Orange is a *socially constructed slice of a continuous spectrum* - just like the ‘ancestry’ categories these tests report