Profile avatar
docrobperry.bsky.social
In no particular order: EM physician, Scot 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 living in 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Independence supporter, Video Game Geek, Photographer, Hearts Fan, and in no particular order. All views my own. Represent neither my employer nor my Royal College.
465 posts 880 followers 451 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
To be fair, he was never meant to be that man. The SNP had been taking a battering. The BHA had collapsed, which cost Humza his job. JS was the obvious interim leader, brought in to steady the ship and provide much-needed stability. Which he has.
comment in response to post
Yes - and the ‘what are you going to do about it, eh?’ attitude. ‘Aren’t we clever? You got to have a vote, you lost, and now you’ll never get another one, no matter how many promises we break.’
comment in response to post
How many is that now?
comment in response to post
This is the UK government’s way of saying that they think the Indy question has been settled for ever, and they will never permit it to be revisited. Please prove them wrong, Scotland.
comment in response to post
I’m not sure if it’s even that it becomes the new normal. I think people become resigned to it. It reminds me of the pre-devolution days, when people were resigned to constant Tory governments because there was nothing anyone could do to stop them.
comment in response to post
And one final point: you mean ‘independence’, not ‘secession’. Framing it like this is a favourite Unionist tactic, because it makes it all about the UK, when it’s about Scotland. And because independence is universally regarded as a positive thing, and we can’t have that. You have a good day now.
comment in response to post
As for the referendum, it was 11 years ago now and won on the votes of over-65s. All the promises made to secure the result were broken. A key plank of the No campaign was EU membership, and since then Scotland has been forced out of the EU despite voting 62% Remain. The situation is not the same.
comment in response to post
What utter pompous nonsense. Is Scotland independent right now? No. Was there a civil war? No. So nobody ‘didn’t accept it’. Did you actually expect that those who wanted independence would just pack up and go home forever? If so, then you badly need to grow up.
comment in response to post
The current situation is literally the same as one spouse in a marriage being powerless to ask for a divorce unless they first persuade the other spouse to allow it. When it is clearly in their interest to prevent it.
comment in response to post
You’re being disingenuous. Yes, the people must be persuaded, that’s a given. But it should not be required to obtain the approval of those entirely opposed to independence in order to be allowed to ask the people in the first place. That is grotesque.
comment in response to post
Democratic, naturally. But if you are about to claim this means the rest of the UK gets to have a say, No. Scotland’s future is a matter for Scotland and absolutely nobody else.
comment in response to post
No, it’s actually a great deal simpler than that. If you are a member of a club, the rules don’t suit you, and are holding you back, you should be able to resign your membership. The other members of the club don’t get any say in this. It’s literally none of their business.
comment in response to post
Exactly. The last part especially. As you say, there is never a guarantee. Estonia became independent when its GDP was $2000 a head. They didn’t know what the future held, but they knew they wanted to determine it themselves, and that was enough. It is now prosperous with a GDP of $30k.
comment in response to post
This. Unionists always behave as if independence supporters are required to present a watertight economic case (which they know is impossible). But nobody ever presents a positive case for the Union. Nobody even tried in 2014. The sole argument was ‘you”ll never make it on your own’. It still is.
comment in response to post
I could have a ‘debate’ with you on this. But I’ve done this before, and it would involve you taking the Starmer role and simply belittling any argument I made, knowing nothing can actually be proved either way. And I neither want nor require your approval. Just as Scotland does not need England’s.
comment in response to post
Keir Starmer does this. He claims that there is a democratic route for Scotland to become independent, but won’t say what it is, and claims it’s for those who want Indy to find it themselves! The arrogance and smugness of a colonial governor who knows he can make up rules as it suits him.
comment in response to post
Nobody owes you ‘evidence’. Independence is something it is entirely OK to want for its own sake. Why should Scotland be the only country in history to have to provide an ‘evidence-based’ case that satisfies the country from which it wishes to be independent? Surely you can see the problem here?
comment in response to post
If the best argument you can come up with is that all cross-border trade will cease after independence out of pure spite, you really don’t have anything credible left to say.
comment in response to post
None of this comes as a surprise - Starmer doesn’t like democracy unless it produces the result he wants - but it’s interesting he is ‘ruling out’ a referendum on Irish unity, the right to which is part of the Good Friday Agreement. He clearly doesn’t think that matters.
comment in response to post
Not the destination, but perhaps a sensible stop along the way. EU membership would take time to negotiate, even with the support of all concerned, but joining EFTA would almost certainly be a lot quicker.
comment in response to post
As was always going to happen. When the young are hugely in favour of something and the only group resolutely opposed are pensioners, it’s an inescapable demographic inevitability.
comment in response to post
‘Starmer takes stand against democracy’. There you go, that’s the headline. You’re welcome.
comment in response to post
Sadly, there is a section of the Scottish electorate who would happily vote for Caligula if they thought he was best placed to ‘stop the SNP’ and prevent independence.
comment in response to post
I don’t mind quite so much if it’s an MP or a constituency MSP, as allegedly people voted for that person to represent them (even though most vote for the party). It’s when list MSPs change party that it really irritates. People literally voted for the party. The party should get their seat back.
comment in response to post
That’s fine, Mr Starmer. You want it, why don’t you find somewhere in England to store it? I’m sure anywhere will be perfectly safe as long as it’s (checks notes) 40 miles from a major city.
comment in response to post
Some people will happily vote for whoever they think will ‘stop the SNP’ and prevent independence, and they aren’t choosy about who it is. I don’t remotely understand the mindset, but it’s clearly true.
comment in response to post
More Parlabane! Cannae wait.
comment in response to post
The article is behind a paywall, but can 100% confirm that Ash Regan is a fuckwit. She stood as a candidate to be leader of the SNP (who have been in government in Scotland since 2007) and then jumped ship to a fringe party when she didn’t win.
comment in response to post
Really sorry to hear this. Hope you’re OK.
comment in response to post
Hey, at least they mentioned his party in the headline. An honour usually reserved for SNP politicians.
comment in response to post
The script was for it to be Hearts who did it, but the ref in the semi had other ideas. Ah well, we’d only have choked in the final I expect.
comment in response to post
Brexit is a titanic mistake, sold to the country on a raft of lies. The polls have shown a clear majority of voters can see this now. Why does the country have to be shackled to one awful decision for ever?
comment in response to post
Absolutely. Have said this many times. And in pretty much all of them, the day they claimed it is a national holiday. Independence is normal. I’ve yet to meet an Irish person who would vote to rejoin the UK, no matter what the situation.
comment in response to post
Yes! It doesn’t have to be ANYTHING else. Self-determination is something it is absolutely OK to want for its own sake. This is on page 1 of the UN charter.
comment in response to post
I realised a wee while back that the reason for this is that everything about Scottish independence is always framed as how it affects the UK. Hence ‘breaking up’, ‘secession’, etc. This is exactly the same. It all has to be about the Union, so Indy must be anti-English.
comment in response to post
There really could be no clearer argument for the abolition of the House of Lords in its current form.
comment in response to post
Saw an Argentinian flag and wondered what was going on!
comment in response to post
Shamelessly stealing that line.
comment in response to post
Agreed. A sport designed by someone who doesn’t understand sport. The seekers are literally playing a different game from the other players, and what the latter do hardly ever matters. She realised this eventually, hence the World Cup scene where a team catches the snitch and still loses.
comment in response to post
I honestly can’t see what it’s supposed to be for. They made a film of each book (two for the last one) and stuck closely to the plot. The films were amazing and captured the world perfectly. This feels like a simple cash grab, and she already has more money than God.
comment in response to post
I don’t know. I think her biblical stubbornness and refusal to reconsider her opinion in light of new evidence is probably just her, though. I suspect she wasn’t so unpleasant to begin with, but gradually backed herself into a corner where she had to become nastier and nastier to avoid recanting.
comment in response to post
The exact moment the scales fell from my eyes about the BBC’s ‘neutrality’. It’s one thing to distort and reframe (as they do, of course) but telling outright lies about something you broadcast earlier in the day? That’s next level.