draditrapani.bsky.social
Scientist š©āš¬ and globetrotter šŗļø atm š©āš»
Born in š®š¹ living in š«š· š§šŖ š¬š§ => šŖšŗ
Books/theatre/cinema/gigs buff šŖ
šµšø | ā®ļø & ā¤ļø | ā
1,272 posts
457 followers
377 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Yet only 3 out of 44 countries in Europe don't have ID cards. Most of Europe find this debate in UK baffling
comment in response to
post
Just I donāt speak Gaelic, only a few words, whereas you speak Italianā¦do you live in Italy? Or just learned the language while on hols?
comment in response to
post
I wonder why they didnāt use the word in the AI ads but then they used at the end letās crack on, they could have made it more authentic using craic ā¦
comment in response to
post
True, sorry, thatās why you can still claim VAT when buying products in EU or CHā¦itās just there are barely any checks now, only randomly done when you go through CH.
comment in response to
post
I lived in Dublin for almost 4 years!
comment in response to
post
Easy explained here, good to note the UK place on it. In good company.
comment in response to
post
It depends what you wish to have as result. Do you want just normal dialogue? Nothing to do.
Do you want deepen relationships which include trade and no barriers? Drop your red lines.
Anything the UK wishes hinges on them. Not much to do then.
comment in response to
post
CH is not a non-MS as third country, they are EFTA members so there is already an agreement between EFTA-EU and although non inside EEA, it shares with EU all the rights and obligations. It has long history, now it would not work. So either you are in or out. UK is not even close to CH relationship
comment in response to
post
The Memphis Massacre, New Orleans Massacre, Fort Pillow Massacre, Los Angeles Chinese Massacre, the massacre and burning of Black Wall Street & much more. AmeriKKKa has a history of massacres in communities of color.
comment in response to
post
They pick the wrong example, thinking CH is cherry picking when in reality CH shows that either you are in and accept everything, contribute and have obligations or you are out.
UK decided to be out with its red lines.
comment in response to
post
And it wonāt bring any considerable benefit at the end. It was just fluff from Starmer to confuse the confused Labour minds that it could work and will make Brexit work and Britain great again!
comment in response to
post
It took years of negotiation for at the end being like in the EUā¦thatās why the EU is not allowing that anymore.
They accept SM, CU and Schengen.
Tell me how the UK could gain that with its red linesā¦
comment in response to
post
Switzerland is part of EFTA, and although not in EEA, itās in the SM, CU and Schengen. Switzerland accepts the EU on mutual benefits, contributes to the budget and has obligations.
comment in response to
post
' One of the strengths behind this is that Starmer and his team probably believe Brexit is genuinely bad for Britain'.
'Probably' is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. Starmer's lunatic 'red lines' do not indicate Starmer thinks Brexit is bad, just that he thinks he can make Brexit work.
comment in response to
post
Only trade deals but no obligations. This is not possible as itās not a mutual benefit.
comment in response to
post
The agreements with non-MS never cross into the domains of SM/CM as they cannot advantage a third country over their members without paying they dues (rights and obligations). Otherwise what will be the incentive to join the EU/EEA if a third country can get some advantages? We all know UK seeks
comment in response to
post
Because itās part of the diplomacy to keep dialogue ongoing even with your competitors or enemies
The YMS came about after UK tried to strike a bilateral deal only with some countries.
Itās clear that SPS advantages UK only not the EU so this is a concession in return for fish rights.
comment in response to
post
Only Pearle which I really donāt know, many EU industries are not signatories.
comment in response to
post
There is not one EU signatory mentioned in the article, itās only the UK industry. Your title is incorrect and thus misleading as it were a joint request which is not.
comment in response to
post
Of accession countries and two more countries are joining Schengen.
comment in response to
post
The words mutually beneficial (ie another name for cherry picking) is advocated only by the UK side. For the EU mutually beneficial is the whole package, ie EU with SM and CU, otherwise there is no other benefit. Itās a matter of size, 27 vs 1. We lost one country but we are growing, there is a Q
comment in response to
post
I can only see the UK industry signatories behind it. The whole article is about the UK musiciansā issues. The title is misleading as if it was a joint request, UK and EU. Can we send a complaint for a correction?
comment in response to
post
Every single day will be good š
comment in response to
post
Italy > UK? Thatās a news for me!
comment in response to
post
I am also a scientist and a policy person, I interact with both and I can translate science to policy makers but the BS on those topics from political scientists is beyond me know.
comment in response to
post
People DO NOT understand quantum computing AT ALL. Way to much it will be classical computing but faster nonsense. When its uses cases (if any) will be limited to specific operations amenable to solving via quantum algorithms.
comment in response to
post
Mostly when itās mentioned as magic by policy/IR/lawyers/political sciences folks ā¦ wtf I am not pretending to know law, I stick to my specific narrow STEM knowledge, why all those people pretend to understand and waffle about it? Itās my daily battle now!
comment in response to
post
Quantum is the hype, people talk a lot about it but nobody understands quantum science, for many is just schoedringerās cat being everywhereā¦I have been working on quantum physics for as long as I remember and still itās hard to understand. I am appalled by all the AI, Quantum and all EDTs buzz