drdavegoldberg.bsky.social
Physicist, writer, liberal, husband and father. Pretty good cook.
1,619 posts
439 followers
90 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Well, seeing as just last week he was going on about how he's done interfering in politics, I feel like he might not be the most reliable.
comment in response to
post
And make DC and Puerto Rico states.
comment in response to
post
He is both the douchiest and douchiest *looking* senator.
comment in response to
post
My hope is that the next Dem president campaigns on (and then enacts) a plan to revoke any and all actions taken by the Trump administration which were create by fiat. No deliberation. 99% of them have been malicious bullshit.
comment in response to
post
Here is my made up analysis of a made up woman's response to my made up scenario.
comment in response to
post
But he hates it for all the wrong reasons.
And also, everything that comes out of his drug-addled mouth is a lie and an act. Who knows (or cares) what he really thinks?
comment in response to
post
Literally the only thing he's correct about.
comment in response to
post
Pathetic compliance on behalf of the law review. Absolutely fucking gutless.
comment in response to
post
e->o.
comment in response to
post
Good.
comment in response to
post
Just absolutely endless corruption.
comment in response to
post
In the alternate universe in which Ukraine had shared their attack plans with Trump, I guarantee it would have failed.
comment in response to
post
It’s not. I totally thought it was a response to a separate thread. My bad.
comment in response to
post
You don’t announce a campaign with no way to contribute to it. That’s just malpractice.
comment in response to
post
Where the hell is his actblue page? I looked and google isn’t telling me how to give him cash.
comment in response to
post
Seems low.
comment in response to
post
What's the batting average for the Supreme Court? Either through correct decisions that the SC has refused to hear, or when correct decisions have been upheld? My impression that while we're doing well at the district and appeals court level, the SC is far, far lower in that regard.
comment in response to
post
What happened in January 2025?
comment in response to
post
This is literally the only election where the pro-Trump did even as well as expected all year.
comment in response to
post
Polish presidential election: Karol Nawrocki given narrow lead in late poll – live www.theguardian.com/world/live/2...
Link here
comment in response to
post
Of course, this is how they justify saying nobody is being kicked off of Medicaid. If they're just "enforcing the existing laws" and what they claim are illegal users are the ones thrown off, then nobody got thrown off! QED!
comment in response to
post
If I'm reading it correctly, unlike exit polls here in the States, the "late" exit polls actually incorporate voting results from precincts where there is >50% reporting. So it's a bigger deal than just two random samples within the margin of error.
comment in response to
post
Even their defenses are a lie. When people lose coverage (as, of course, the bill was designed for), they will claim disingenuously that anybody who lost coverage was not supposed to be getting medicaid in the first place, so they didn't really _lose_ coverage. QED.
comment in response to
post
Yeah. No shit. And outlets that credulously reported that he was are absolutely garbage at their jobs.
comment in response to
post
100%, and clear as day.
comment in response to
post
Very likely true. But I’d be very surprised if she’s doing the job in 2 months.
comment in response to
post
But hasn’t the Supreme Court essentially agreed that he _is_ the embodiment of the executive branch?
comment in response to
post
We thought no such thing.
comment in response to
post
Somehow, I feel like they’ll reconcile.
comment in response to
post
3/ I think the idea that he "failed" is the work of some crisis communications team which is trying to end scrutiny into Musk and his companies. If he failed, you don't need to worry abt him anymore, keep scrutinizing all the contracts he hovered up for his companies, keep trying to exact ...
comment in response to
post
Yes
comment in response to
post
What’s wrong with his head?
comment in response to
post
Her definition of "horrors" is doubtless doing a lot of heavy lifting.
comment in response to
post
Is it really that difficult to just call a spade a spade? Leavitt, just be honest for once in your miserable fucking life.
comment in response to
post
I guess the good news is that since the Justice department is clearly corrupted, anyone looking for justice (small j) was going to rely on state convictions in the first place.