drivedog.bsky.social
Simultaneously pessimistic and optimistic.
DMs ok if something a bot or paid scavenger would not say. "Betelgeuse going nova!" or "Voles United!" might work. "Hello", NOPE.
If you don't read this first don't message me.
Also @[email protected]
875 posts
1,408 followers
2,240 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
And this kid. Band geeks can save the world!
comment in response to
post
If you study the successful rebellions and resistance and civil rights movements of the past, you will note that “people who spend their time publicly bumming out everyone around them by emphasizing how totally fucked everything is” do not play a central role, or indeed, any role at all
comment in response to
post
Of course.
But Johnson's Pinocchio nose is so long he can't pronounce "promise".
comment in response to
post
Good luck. 25 years ago the city here (in North Carolina, US) said they would widen the road nearby. They did it 2 years ago. The city had planned to create a new lake/reservoir in 1927(!). It was started about 2000 and ready around 2010. I'm sick of it.
comment in response to
post
Is that a promise?
comment in response to
post
We would expect no less. Treasonous pos.
comment in response to
post
Yes, it's easy to see the trend since 1981.
comment in response to
post
Damn right!
comment in response to
post
Shame? I don't know. Fear of reprisals, legally or not, for the crimes and ethical violations they're committing, certainly.
comment in response to
post
If she was exfiltrated to, say, Iceland, I don't think there'd be a way to convince her she wouldn't be killed, no matter the protection offered. Ghislaine probably has, in her head, information that could contribute to the downfall of Trumpers. :(
comment in response to
post
That can't be unseen or undone afterwards.
Somebody awaken us from this nightmare.
comment in response to
post
Chicksh¡ts at Fox/etc are afraid to favor either as the disfavored will certainly do them damage. Besides, as the article implies, they haven't a clue who'll "win", so whom to choose.
comment in response to
post
Absolute trash, all six. Disbar all six of them and charge and imprison at least those accepting direct bribes (Thomas & Alito, for sure).
comment in response to
post
Aside from AOC, Bernie, Jasmine, a few others... where is everyone else?
comment in response to
post
I'd like for them to escalate it, but to draw in Bezos, Mike Johnson, JD, Zuck, etc, and nobody leaves the room, er, dome.
Thunderdome!
comment in response to
post
Or maybe a nice result: Fell Out.
comment in response to
post
As usual, there's an appropriate Josey Wales quote, this time from Granny Hawkins. "I say that big talk's worth doodly-squat."
comment in response to
post
Pour more gasoline on that fire!
comment in response to
post
Maybe, will try in mirror to see if anything else moves. Can do the nostril flare thing.
comment in response to
post
This—the "bug", the human body inhabited in MIB.
comment in response to
post
It's his job to know what's in a bill he's voting on. He failed miserably. Throw him out.
comment in response to
post
What they're doing over here is really shitty. Squash Farage if you can.
comment in response to
post
His motto is apparently "any distraction will do".
comment in response to
post
Here's an official portrait 💩
comment in response to
post
Duke it out, idiots.
comment in response to
post
I agree. Although I might buy a 60-64 some day, I've driven rear swing axle cars beyond the limit and the design sucks. 65-69 had a vastly improved—and IMO, better IRS than other US-made cars at the time. I was surprised with the ride quality as well. Way better than other old compacts.
comment in response to
post
😝
comment in response to
post
I have lots of thoughts about the others but with d. in particular I agree.
comment in response to
post
Most can't even imitate, either. A shiny stainless steel grille, pop country, and a new crew cab pickup? No way.
comment in response to
post
Absolutely no civility against the threat is called for.
comment in response to
post
Being tough isn't the same as being mean, though I realize that's what's meant. We can use every legitimate tool available and it'll work but not if we wimp out. Push AND shove. Force it. Shut them down at every point. Let nothing stand that should not. Kick them out.
comment in response to
post
Good question. If so, and the cost.
comment in response to
post
"The market" is a lot of clueless business school-but-lacking-general-knowledge-and-understanding types, a few who get what's going on but aren't involved, and then those who are guilty of participating. Lightning-fast trades don't avoid being duped by the cons when so many fall for the stunts.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
"Critics condemned Graham as a 'shitty person' for the post."
“'In a good country, this kind of tweet would be disqualifying for public office,' said one."
"Shitty person" is a mighty nice way of describing him.
comment in response to
post
Don't be fooled by the hoopla. Cryptocurrency was imagined as an exchange of value. It may still be useful in that way, particularly for illicit drug deals and murder-for-hire. It is NOT and likely never will be a decent store of value nor an "investment". "Pyramid Scheme" is an apt description.
comment in response to
post
This is the problem. I say give 'em a raise. Say, $500k/yr. But no money, campaign or personal, from anyone else. Maybe allow truly blind trusts for investments, but no money from anyone during office, nor from anyone benefitting from their decisions during office, ever.
comment in response to
post
All the chaos is cover for and distraction from that and the stealing.
comment in response to
post
Even though it comes from the top, someone lower knows of both the court order AND the direct order and knows the court order was the one they lawfully should've followed. Charge them. Keep doing so until the "just following orders" crowd has been purged.
comment in response to
post
Nitrous for too long, passed out, fell on the furniture.
comment in response to
post
Cundles!