drkatiecairns.bsky.social
60 posts
159 followers
565 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
I understand that some Irish history had a political intersection with British history that might be…challenging, but YDTM has always managed that sensitively, and I bet you can do it.
comment in response to
post
Oh, I have heard *every* episode and am eager for more!!
comment in response to
post
Don’t need to be. There is specific care navigation training, and practices, federations and PCNs share training and resources.
comment in response to
post
Ok…
But our vaccination clinics functioned this year because we were able to use medical students and our teenage children to check patients in, paid on a casual basis.
Would a centrally operated GP service be as agile and adaptive?
No.
Partners get a profit share: not a fixed income.
comment in response to
post
In case you were wondering where primary care is at, there is currently training for a course on “A framework for managing the sudden and unexpected death of a colleague in the primary care setting” on my timeline.
comment in response to
post
We insist patients speak to a GP before getting blood tests: you can’t just see our nurse for “routine blood tests”.
Patients don’t always appreciate that it’s an essential safety measure.
A random abnormal result with no history or examination is very difficult to manage safely, so we avoid it.
comment in response to
post
When patient won’t tell our receptionists what the problem is, and insist on speaking to a GP, it can be very frustrating for everyone to then say “you should have gone to ED or a pharmacy hours ago when you first called”, but it happens.
comment in response to
post
Care navigation is key, and admin team are trained.
There is a list of “do not pass go: ED”, another list of “have you gone to a pharmacy: they can probably sort this”, a list of “our pharmacist/nurse can deal with that” and finally, “you need to speak to a GP”.
comment in response to
post
My practice pharmacists do our hypertension and asthma reviews and deal with most medication queries, probably better than I would.
No undifferentiated illnesses.
comment in response to
post
PAs have no role in General Practice seeing undifferentiated patients : as per RCGP. I would personally never employ one.
Either a nurse or HCA or a GP instead. PAs don’t bring skills I need at a cost I would pay.
comment in response to
post
The choices are uplifting GMS (which is based on 2 visits per year) to reflect reality, or fee per visit.
It’s interesting you think it’s boomers who visit most.
It’s kids and people aged 50-70.
The old folk got that way by avoiding us.
comment in response to
post
Everything says partnership is the most productive, cost effective model possible: it’s not shady:
GP Partnerships have UNLIMITED liability. It’s in our interests to make things work.
Income is limited by government monopsony contracts which aren’t really negotiated , we have very few options.
comment in response to
post
I work in a Trust owned building: rent is I/O.
No pharmacy (and dispensing practices are rare).
If partners own building, notional rent is paid…which may or may not cover mortgage and maintenance.
comment in response to
post
£40basic GMS which covers one appointment, with £20 per appointment thereafter.
A single payment to cover bottomless appointments/tests/referrals is not sustainable with an ageing population with multiple co-morbidities.
comment in response to
post
Telephony, texting, IT, postage, office supplies, cleaning, confidential waste, utilities, medical equipment and consumables: that all has to be paid for too.
comment in response to
post
And the “ideal” list size per full time GP is somewhere between 1500-1800.
So for a list size of 7690 you *ideally* want 4-5 full time GP.
Plus practice manager, admin team (at least 4 full time) and practice nurses.
That £600k has to stretch quite far…
comment in response to
post
At least 150 10min appointments a day, including nurse appointments, probably.
And that’s just appointments: not admin (results, referrals, letters, prescriptions, reports), which takes about the same amount of time again for GPs.
And remember the safe limit is supposed to be 25appointments/day/GP
comment in response to
post
It’s not sustainable.
Contracts are being handed back.
There has been a 20% real terms cut in funding.
Primary care in the UK is offering millions more appointments per year now than pre-pandemic: that’s a huge improvement in access and productivity, and it’s invisible.
comment in response to
post
The average patient sees a GP 6 times a year, and no GP works 10sessions a week, because that would mean >100hrs once the admin time (results, letters, reports) is taken into account.
Your numbers are…not based in reality.
comment in response to
post
No, I’m saying that a hybrid model will be a last resort to increase practice funding to keep the lights on, unless something changes, not that it’s what we’re doing now, or what I want to do.
Does £70 sound ridiculous? Yes. Because it is.
Most GPs just want a sensible number instead.
comment in response to
post
It’s not the partnership model, it’s the level of funding.
Without care, GP is going to end up like dentistry, a two tier hybrid private/NHS service with fee per activity, unless funding increases to sustainable levels.
comment in response to
post
Not keen. I like being my own boss.
This model has been proposed, but it would cost billions…because partners do so much invisible unpaid work.
I’ll be on my laptop today and tomorrow.
Wouldn’t for a salary.
comment in response to
post
And now National insurance costs (because we can’t get SME exemption because we’re “public bodies”, but ALSO can’t get Health exemption because we’re “private businesses”) we’re looking at >£20k additional costs per year.
We can’t raise our prices, reduce our services or advertise for more customers
comment in response to
post
Northern Ireland GP currently has 5.4% of Health budget…
0% increase in funding for 4th year running.
comment in response to
post
That’s the Global sum (GMS) payment.
We get some extra payments for certain things (vaccines, monitoring specific medicines, chronic disease reviews etc), but for the average person without chronic illness, it’s Carr-Hill applied to GMS. www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-s...
comment in response to
post
Everyone likes to complain about GPs
No one knows how we are funded.
How can you complain you aren’t getting value for money when you don’t know what is being paid?
comment in response to
post
Your *insurance* for a pet cat is probably double what your go gets paid for unlimited appointments, blood tests, prescriptions, referrals
comment in response to
post
Do you know my practice gets paid £70 per patient, per year.
I will get paid £70 if you have 0 appointments or 26 appointments.
If you attend the nurse (who I employ) 0 or 10 times.
comment in response to
post
It’s a genuinely very effective gargle for sore throats…and as a bonus, no one will come close enough to you after you use it to catch whatever you have!
Whether someone cleans with Phenol Vs Milton Vs Dettol Vs Zoflora is the *real* way to age someone.
comment in response to
post
I *like* writing letters, especially if I am cross.
It’s about finding catharsis in creation. While I usually sleep on the first draft and have someone else read it before sending, it’s a little joy that I shan’t give up willingly to AI.
comment in response to
post
Ely *always* triggers memories of a certain creepy late 80s BBC Children’s show.
Tom’s Midnight Garden, along with Moondial is why I struggle with horror as an adult…nothing will ever be that scary again.
comment in response to
post
“
comment in response to
post
I looked at all the risks and benefits, weighed them up, made a judgement based on my own values and judgement and chose elective CS...three times, with GREAT birth experiences.
Is that not allowed?
Only "natural" counts?
Jog on.