Profile avatar
drlynam.bsky.social
Professor of Psychological Sciences / Music, cocktails, personality, & open science / Perpetually disappointed in the field / Opinions are often strongly stated https://sites.google.com/view/donald-lynam/home ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8306-498
511 posts 1,152 followers 263 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to post
Unlikely, but thanks for trying.
comment in response to post
Thanks, Martin. It has driven me crazy for years as well.
comment in response to post
that certainly explains why tRump went to bat for him.
comment in response to post
I think this one of the funniest things I have ever heard. Although it certainly lends some credence to Freud's conception of rationalization.
comment in response to post
So all of this DT work based on Jungian theory is being done without attribution!!!???
comment in response to post
I bet that none of these terms show up in DT research: Ego, personal unconscious, collective unconscious, archetypes, persona, shadow, anima, animus, synchronicity, transcendent function, complexes, libido (psychic energy), mandala, amplification, psychological types, dream symbolism.
comment in response to post
Jungian theory is origin of modern theories? That is laughable. I have to say, I've never seen any Jungian theory in any of your work. Or any Dark Triad work for that matter.
comment in response to post
It does not matter what the hell Jung said 100 years ago. We dont use manie sans delerie or dementia praecox. Can we begin using atavism again since Lombroso wrote about? Get serious.
comment in response to post
Folding one?
comment in response to post
I also give them this.
comment in response to post
Omit needless words.
comment in response to post
Omit needless words.
comment in response to post
To fuckin' kill me!?
comment in response to post
I almost died laughing.
comment in response to post
Interesting.
comment in response to post
I am with @jdmiller.bsky.social on this. I say what I think. And I sign everything.
comment in response to post
It leads to more evaluable science. I am suspicious of non-transparent work. I haven't found that preregistration or registered reports cut my productivity by very much.