drsardonicus.bsky.social
Twitter refugee. Iconoclastic electronics techno geek who is opinionated and passionate about most everything.
224 posts
5,882 followers
10,709 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
They're Finding Out
comment in response to
post
FFS
comment in response to
post
When a public poll shows a +/- 3% margin of error, all they had to do in swing states was to find 3.1% additional voters to move the baseline mean to Trumps favor. This is why Musk bought twitter and drove it into the ground. He didn't care about the company, it was the data that he wanted.
comment in response to
post
Once identified they focused on swing states and used push messaging to convince these potential voters to vote. Since they were not in polling sample screens, they do not show up for general and dem pollsters, and only in Trump targeted polls.
comment in response to
post
it was not rigged. Very simply, the most likely scenario was the Musk used Twitter as a database to search for MAGA leaning people who had never voted and so were not on the likely voter screens. He, and Thiel, ran the data mining operation in stealth mode on AI clusters.
comment in response to
post
we can and we will. Compassionate masculinity is what we need.
comment in response to
post
I have a bin with 2 of every cord that I might need that was winnowed down from a bazillion.
comment in response to
post
God will smite Trump
comment in response to
post
Supply and demand is best understood at the raw materials stage of manufacturing
comment in response to
post
I blocked him
comment in response to
post
Gotta love AI art with 6 toes
comment in response to
post
He was also responsible for the economic analysis that allows the Fed to use interest rates to fine tune the economy. His good works are few, but this is one.
He's also the reason why China has grown so rapidly. They followed his economic advice. But they are a dictatorship and can do as they want
comment in response to
post
Never have I had that delusion.
comment in response to
post
Thanks for messaging me this way. I appreciate it. Feel free to message me directly on the future.
comment in response to
post
Press the little rectangular box that pops up when you first start the app
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Balls
comment in response to
post
Funny thing. At the postal service is actually in the Constitution. To privatize, the postal service requires a constitutional amendment
comment in response to
post
Truly. Right now is time to find our people
comment in response to
post
That's not good. Canada hydro powers the northeast
comment in response to
post
George Takai
comment in response to
post
You are too your 11 yo self.
Love the honey bee tattoo!
🐝
comment in response to
post
Okay, your a big deal
comment in response to
post
But, but, they do their own research
comment in response to
post
Elle, I love you
comment in response to
post
Boop
comment in response to
post
Nope, the vice president becomes president. 20th amendment.
If the President-elect dies or is unable to qualify before inauguration, the Vice President-elect becomes President.
comment in response to
post
Some delicacies have to be abandoned for greater peace and serenity
comment in response to
post
Same. Don't forget the Illuminati bots
comment in response to
post
Lobster Mac and cheese
comment in response to
post
So dramatic
comment in response to
post
Yes. Prices have hysteresis. Hysteresis is non linear and is time dependent
comment in response to
post
The problem assumes that the relationship between supply and demand is linear. It is not. It is non-linear because money grubbing humans are involved.
Supply/demand curves are linear when prices need to increase. But there is lag in the supply chain. Companies tend to change prices downward slowly
comment in response to
post
Sorry, I don't know laspatian math. Sorry, I'm just a stupid communications system engineer.
comment in response to
post
We do line in happy math land. Unfortunately it is stochastic.
comment in response to
post
The problem is known as price stickiness. Prices are raised immediately when supply changes. Prices are lowered ... Almost never. Krugman discusses this.
comment in response to
post
1) duh
2) of course
3) yup
comment in response to
post
We'll that's just as reductionist and fundamentalist. Rather than analyze what people say I'd rather discuss and probe without assuming to know what they actually think. Humans are generally not so black and white as we tend to project on them.
comment in response to
post
I agree
comment in response to
post
Agreed