ecg7012.bsky.social
He/him/his
26 posts
23 followers
60 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
This means the most harmed women are the biggest targets of this idea and the ones who stand to gain the most from it. The funny thing being that it promises a world without gender policing after it is perfectly instituted. That’s how TERFs can be anti-gender and anti-trans. 2/2
comment in response to
post
Hear me out, I think it’s this. Maintaining womanhood means creating a hierarchy by which people are judged. A trans-exclusionary version of this involves policing at the boundaries which directly impacts less feminine presentations. The excuses around this are ‘protecting women.’ 1/2
comment in response to
post
Did he just say pedophilia’s bad? And that he still did it anyways???
comment in response to
post
Maybe I’ll be wooshed, but this is actually how at least one genocide has worked. There are no distractions.
comment in response to
post
Banger.
comment in response to
post
My thing is I don’t think social network = social media. Like yes it is a place with social interaction capacities, but that isn’t enough. YT culture is very top-down and mostly revolves around reactions: Unlike other social media, almost all communication revolves entirely around the OP.
comment in response to
post
This but in the voice of the Count from Sesame Street
comment in response to
post
🫵😳
comment in response to
post
BoymoderSephiroth would like to have a word with you…
comment in response to
post
THE CREAM RISES TO THE TOP
comment in response to
post
In the US, ppl say “red leather yellow leather.” Same shit, new smell 🤷♂️
comment in response to
post
Sorry, I’m not reading your comment so that I’m not influenced or implied
comment in response to
post
The equivalent of button-mashing for parry mechanics in video games. Like always waiting for an enemy to attack first, parrying, and then getting a return hit in.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, that would just mean you have a good conclusion and bad argument. Like if you said the money supply impacts prices but acted like that’s bc ppl value money more when it’s rare.
comment in response to
post
Honor people by posthumously changing their name to something cool 🙌
comment in response to
post
What does different social location mean? /gen
comment in response to
post
Ghandi strat in the UK? Bold move.
comment in response to
post
For individual adult devout Catholics? You’re right ofc. However the Church as an institution is not just that. When its doctrine is realized in teaching children, when people question their faith, when political leaders use it? The contradictions and variation matter a lot.
comment in response to
post
They obviously misunderstood, it’s only for people with all genders smh. Those rookie numbers won’t make the cut
comment in response to
post
You trans men so that you can be more fair to them?! /s
comment in response to
post
I know this is probably not your typical comment, but what’s your regime like? You’ve got my ideal build fr lmao
comment in response to
post
The right of men to govern women, whether or not it is exercised. (2/2)
comment in response to
post
I agree with the base elements of this interpretation, but I think it doesn’t provide a very helpful framework for most gender expressions (eg man-man relations, purity standards for men, prude-pure dual roles). It’s more accurate to describe it as the system to justify (1/2)
comment in response to
post
Yeah, you could literally just do a private, off-market mint and then all buyers hold the bag 😬
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
It always seemed queerphobic to me tbh. I think it’s meant to say the only way you could be that interested in someone else is if you’re gay or trans. I don’t think it’s exactly intentional, but it identifies queerness with obsession and fetishization, even to the point of violence.