eeschenberg.bsky.social
Neuroscience and Science Diplomacy.
Psychedelic sciences critical thinking
eduardoschenberg.com
Affiliated Researcher at Petrie-Flom Center, Harvard / Honorary Researcher at LAB lab, UCL.
https://linktr.ee/eduardoschenberg
292 posts
2,394 followers
584 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
"Systematic reviews have consistently shown that assessment of blinding integrity is rarely conducted in psychiatry."
If you're using unblinding to invalidate psychedelic trials only, you're missing the big picture...
comment in response to
post
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
comment in response to
post
That also says a lot about the fascination with RCTs as a single 'gold' standard...
comment in response to
post
Ok tks. I highly recommend doing it too! Doesn't take much time for one person and helps everybody with time zone calculations etc! Best wishes and hope to join on Jun 5th
comment in response to
post
Very interesting, thanks for sharing. Is there an .ics file with all the events info, please?
comment in response to
post
Happened before with Microsoft That at twitter, didn't it?!?
comment in response to
post
First time: too big
Second time: you took too long to shorten it
comment in response to
post
Each drug acts on different neurons in different ways, yet they all do the same thing: realign brainwaves and cause unconsciousness. Take that, reductionism!
comment in response to
post
Last but not least, I encourage #everyone to discuss these serious issues with @elsevierconnect.bsky.social and help other academics who are pressuring publishers to adopt better work agreements, more inclusive and respectful of all stakeholders work value and time commitments with their expertises.
comment in response to
post
Therefore, in these circumstances, I have to refuse the invitation. If the journal still wants my contribution, I may reconsider in case Elsevier is willing to adequately and fairly compensate editorial board members. Alternatively, I might consider a role as Associate Editor.
comment in response to
post
This makes it unjustifiable to still count with thousands of unpaid hours, worth billions of dollars, from reviewers (eg doi.org/10.1186/s410...) and others, such as editorial board members in this case.
comment in response to
post
We need urgent changes in academic publishing, which costs research institutions too much, draining important resources from science to unparalled high profit margins for big publishers (eg www.thenation.com/article/soci...).
comment in response to
post
Broken link
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
The tendency I clearly see is of Westerners to continuously discredit any possibility of intelligent and inventiveness worth of merit coming from indigenous peoples. Epistemic inustice is its academic name.
comment in response to
post
Very interesting, tks for sharing. Is it possible to watch the talk online?
comment in response to
post
Colonial. Very colonial. Epistemic injustices abound from start to finish, with the apex to the citation of discredited work of yanomami blood thiefs.
comment in response to
post
Colonialist from start to till the end
comment in response to
post
Very very interesting, congrats. What about smartphone CBT may not be the same as CBT?
comment in response to
post
Very interesting example of the (many) support factors in PAT, which can't all be controlled for by randomization+blinding, as I fleshed out recently bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
comment in response to
post
Very good, except the future tense.
'they' are indigenous peoples, and they've been saying it for a few centuries...
comment in response to
post
What's the plan to mitigate the energy/environmental costs? 🌍🌡️
comment in response to
post
Tks. But they didn't #neuroskyence! Is the brain emoticon?!? I'm getting other noise posts coming in
comment in response to
post
@trpwolff.bsky.social
comment in response to
post
Don't miss the dolphins 🐬 in their nearby beach, accessible only during low tides (or at least that's how it was some 20y ago...)
comment in response to
post
🤔hummm what a "recognition" means? What are the potential negative consequences? I have a bad feeling about it. How about compensation for work?? (And sorry I'll not click on x links...)
comment in response to
post
Highly recommended reading: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
comment in response to
post
Thanks a lot for sharing