Profile avatar
estuary.us
Amateur naturalist aka citizen scientist. Writer, photographer: https://www.estuary.us. Founder and caretaker of a soCal pollinator garden. Native bee species fan and advocate. Born at 317 ppm
579 posts 264 followers 199 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to post
When I bought this I thought it was way too basic and cliche for a big city parade but I'm honestly considering it now, seems like this year is a good year for obnoxiously bright and obvious Pride gear bsky.app/profile/skwi...
comment in response to post
đŸ”„ DeLauro has been relentless today in ripping apart Vought
comment in response to post
Give it a click for more of the story. www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news...
comment in response to post
"We will not stand by as the Trump administration unleashes highly destructive commercial fishing on some of the planet’s most pristine, biodiverse marine environments." - David Henkin, Earthjustice Deputy Managing Attorney
comment in response to post
... And the grand finale: This EO “seeks to silence speech ‘at the very center of the 1st Amend,’ ... does so via the most ‘egregious form of content discrimination—viewpoint discrimination—... all in an “attempt to ‘insulate the govt’s laws from judicial inquiry.’” ... /14
comment in response to post
... Though these quotes may sound like truisms, I’ll indulge myself by sharing two more. “When the govt draws legal scrutiny, its response must be to defend itself in court, not to intimidate those who would force it do so.” ... /13
comment in response to post
... And because “An informed, independent judiciary presumes an informed, independent bar,” these EOs’ “threaten not only the lawyers and their clients but also the ability of a coequal branch of government to function.” ... /12
comment in response to post
... And the lawyers being silenced here, play a unique role in “upholding our democracy.” ... “[t]he right to sue and defend in the courts” is “the right conservative of all other rights, and lies at the foundation of orderly government.” ... /11
comment in response to post
... While “retaliation” sounds retrospective, Bates continues, “its greatest danger lies in its prospective silencing effect.” It creates a “scheme of informal censorship” “analogous to the ... prior restraints that are the “least tolerable of all 1st Am violations.” /10
comment in response to post
... which, apparently by making meritorious arguments in court, he deems to “threaten public safety and national security, limit constitutional freedoms, degrade the quality of American elections, or undermine bedrock American principles” ... /9
comment in response to post
... Not at all incidentally, Jenner is a leader in pro bono service. The American Lawyer rated it #1 in that category for 12 of the last 15 years. Trump’s root-&-branch unconstitutional EO explicitly targets such “powerful pro bono practices” ... /8
comment in response to post
... highlighting Jenner’s “pro bono representation” of transgender clients and its once having “hosted an event interviewing” Weissmann.” (The brief was signed by AG Bondi’s Acting Assoc AG Chad Mizelle & Dep Assoc AG Richard Lawson.) ... /7
comment in response to post
... having once employed @weissmann.substack.com (he left the firm in 2021). Weissman had worked on the Mueller Report &, the EO says, favors “a political agenda against me.” The DOJ’s briefs “double[d] down” on these starkly unconstitutional objectives, ... /6
comment in response to post
... Like the other EOs, Jenner’s is, on its face, nakedly retaliatory of protected speech & association. It punishes Jenner for its “partisan representations,” for “supporting” and “backing” transgender and asylum-seeking clients, and for ... /5
comment in response to post
... While Judge Howell, reviewing the Perkins Coie EO, found at least 9 constitutional violations, Bates focuses solely on Jenner’s “most straightforward winner,” its 1st Amendment retaliation claim. But he then fully explores that one violation's profound threat to democracy. ... /4
comment in response to post
... “In our constitutional order,” Bates writes, “few stars are as fixed as the principle that no official “can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics. ... And in our constitutional order, few actors are as central to fixing that star as lawyers.” /3