Profile avatar
euanspc.bsky.social
Scot šŸ“ó §ó ¢ó ³ó £ó “ó æ • Hill walker ⛰• Sometimes Swimmer šŸŠā€ā™‚ļø • Often found talking about Nordics šŸ‡©šŸ‡°šŸ‡øšŸ‡ŖšŸ‡³šŸ‡“šŸ‡«šŸ‡®šŸ‡®šŸ‡øšŸ‡«šŸ‡“šŸ‡¦šŸ‡½ • Humanist šŸ‘
386 posts 198 followers 847 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to post
It should therefore also recognise societal issues which affect everyone; like disability & social care, like building well-functioning modern infrastructure, energy connectivity, community cohesion, etc etc. Look at the whole of society to address inequalities.
comment in response to post
In a modern society which is multi-dimensional, and isn’t as clear cut as previous old dividing lines used to be, then the way to improving industrial & societal relations is to have a political system which isn’t stuck in the past.
comment in response to post
Why is it healthy? Because collective bargaining is a system that balances conflicts and cooperation; it should be institutionalised and highly coordinated, as a formal means to setting wage growth, improving conditions etc. It should bring folk together to achieve better outcomes, not divide them.
comment in response to post
It’s not all free from controversy; Lynetteholm will be a man-made peninsula which aims to tackle 3 main challenges - climate/flood protection, housing shortage, & space for infrastructure. Space for 20k homes, with 1/4 public housing. But there’s been some resistance due to greenwashing concerns.
comment in response to post
On the question though of would this help progress towards independence? Potentially, if any negotiations resulted in an agreed mechanism by which a referendum would be triggered, then there is scope there to actually move forward. Otherwise, I struggle to see how talks would get beyond that.
comment in response to post
On the other hand, a grand coalition would have the potential to change the dynamics of Scottish politics - and given the public clearly want something different to the status quo, maybe it shouldn’t be totally ruled out.
comment in response to post
Given Labour’s reliance on unionist voters as well, it seems obvious that Reform & the Tories would attack Labour for being soft on the union etc. For the SNP, I’m really not sure its support base would appreciate working with Labour - accusation would be ā€˜soft on independence’.
comment in response to post
An unnamed source in the article suggests "The younger membership honestly couldn’t give two shits about this sort of stuff". All I can say in response is; what a deeply vacuous way to approach energy policy. Be serious!
comment in response to post
I think how much simpler accessing records, public services, welfare etc could be if there was a central digital login portal. I know that it requires trust in institutions to get it right & keep secure, but the tech is absolutely capable.
comment in response to post
A line I keep hearing recently is "all the parties are the same". I don’t agree with that view but it’s not enough just for parties to say they’re better than the others. SNP won big 2011-21 because folk had confidence in the party to govern well.
comment in response to post
Being in govt means there *should* be incumbency advantage, because you can do things and back your words with evidence. But that’s the thing - if it’s just words which folk don’t recognise on the ground, then folk grow scunnered and stop listening.
comment in response to post
There’s a fair bit of cynicism in the electorate atm. Folk don’t believe either of the parties will improve things, or tackle the big problems. Many feel politics is stuck in a doom loop of cuts to public services - where’s the investment that keeps being promised?
comment in response to post
Think the result can be best described as the SNP losing the seat rather than Labour winning it. There’s a clear enthusiasm gap for all the parties just now.
comment in response to post
This *should* be conclusive proof that, if you want a robust economy, ignore the snake oil which the Tories, Reform, Liz Truss, Trump et al are trying to sell you. Look over the North Sea instead.
comment in response to post
I was at Lianvatnet last summer. Just a short hop on the tram, up the hills to the west of the city, it’s a wonderful nature spot.
comment in response to post
As a the War Sailor Museum, it does a really excellent job and with engaging exhibits. The ship is only at Edinburgh up to Thursday, with free entrance, so highly recommend seeing this unique piece of history.
comment in response to post
Reasons I’m not sold on STV is, with our constitutional divide, it still feels susceptible to tactical voting with the aim of ā€˜locking out’ the other side. I’m also not convinced it works great at national-level elections.