ewb.io
coffee son
241 posts
122 followers
114 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
have you considered streaming?
comment in response to
post
fair, would believe that
comment in response to
post
i think you’re absolutely spot on, but to me that’s also why analysts are worried about these voters. they are swayed _the most _ by sound bites and random hearsay, so whoever creates the catchiest burn of their opponent wins their votes
comment in response to
post
spoilers dude!
comment in response to
post
can you post the actual video and not the ai dubbed one?
comment in response to
post
ngl this song slaps
comment in response to
post
if it’s any consolation she sucks too
comment in response to
post
oh you’re back, thought you didn’t want to talk anymore
comment in response to
post
who we talking any here bc don’t think matt y had much to do with the democrats losing. he’s not in party leadership. he’s not anyone’s advisor.
comment in response to
post
alright my guy
comment in response to
post
it seems like in this case the fascists were democratically elected
comment in response to
post
don’t the fascists usher in fascism?
comment in response to
post
hey bud i think people here are frustrated we’re falling into fascism and are taking it out on you
comment in response to
post
a horrible, timid reason not to go through with holding them in contempt
comment in response to
post
just trying to understand.. what part of what he’s saying do you take exception with ?
comment in response to
post
probably time to drop the “aspiring”
comment in response to
post
funny example because most people would rather save $80 than 15 minutes
comment in response to
post
or maybe it’s something in the middle where hey these are useful to some extent but not going to end humanity because they are god incarnate
comment in response to
post
ok but what do you do when people inevitably train on the test set?
comment in response to
post
aren’t we concerned that bluesky has the exact inverted picture and that maybe the point is that discussing politics online is always fraught because of a general anti intellectual culture where dunks are more valuable than reasoned arguments?
comment in response to
post
this seems incredibly arbitrary. yes the models are getting better, but it’s premature to assert scaling
comment in response to
post
obviously there is a bias but cases that brush up against the power of the judiciary tend to be heard more quickly
comment in response to
post
scotus tends to hear important cases much faster than that
comment in response to
post
doing a bit of naive research it seems an open question www.law.cornell.edu/constitution...
comment in response to
post
asking bc i’m ignorant, but wouldn’t trump just pardon them?
comment in response to
post
😭😭😭
comment in response to
post
oh lawd
comment in response to
post
yeah i was immediately like “oh this is the exact plot of the movie”
comment in response to
post
it’s almost like their failure was the point ..
comment in response to
post
someone alert chart crimes
comment in response to
post
p-hacking can definitely happen at the data collection phase as well.
i think this study just demonstrates the level of uncertainty in those datasets and you could consider the distribution of conclusions indicative of that.
comment in response to
post
stopped reading at “nonphysical property”
comment in response to
post
this is the way
comment in response to
post
must construct additional pylons
comment in response to
post
sorry but isnt she being replaced with non-white anchors? i’m worried this narrative is pushed by forces that wish to divide us
comment in response to
post
star wars outlaws was pretty fun
comment in response to
post
soft power > hard power
comment in response to
post
just uninstall it
comment in response to
post
there are bots here too. they just push a different narrative but the point is the same: divide and conquer
comment in response to
post
do you have a copy of the video?
comment in response to
post
so obviously worth more than that
comment in response to
post
sort of reading through the comments here it feels like more of a hit piece. asking readers to do the research themselves about clear omissions doesn’t feel good.
comment in response to
post
yeah it’s just a feeling that the models are more useful b2b than b2c, but i don’t have a reference
comment in response to
post
most people use the models through a cloud service
comment in response to
post
i’m curious when you ask your colleagues why they are still on X, what do they say? have they just successfully created a bubble for themselves there or are they actively ignoring the nazification ?
comment in response to
post
it’s true incompetence should also be assumed before ill will
comment in response to
post
my experience is it’s always just different flavors of versioning data, model, and code together, but would also second the recommendation of Chip Huyen’s posts/books.