falloutcatfella.bsky.social
NAFO fella to the core.
NAFO fella for life.
2,143 posts
4,661 followers
5,512 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Cops like these must be doxxed and ... taken care of.
They're wild animal on rabies not human beings.
comment in response to
post
Poltavka, west towards Zelenyi Hai, and thus complicate the position of the Ukrainian defenders on the eastern flank of Huliajpole (e.g. by attacking their logistics).
📌 South direction.
No changes. 13/13
comment in response to
post
📌 Zaporizhia direction.
The aggressor has intensified actions on the eastern flank of Huliajpole and advanced to no man's land Malynivka. The fighting continues. The likely Russian goal is to take Malynivka under the cover of the Yanchul River, push north towards 12/
comment in response to
post
📎 Unconfirmed information has appeared that the Ukrainians have pushed the aggressor's units away from Komar. According to other data, the occupiers broke into the settlement with three tanks and infantry, but this assault group was destroyed. We will monitor the situation further. 11/
comment in response to
post
complements the aggressor's efforts to achieve operational goals, for example, to take control of the city of Pokrovsk. And in which administrative unit these objects are located is not such an important question from a military point of view. 10/
comment in response to
post
Therefore, the fact itself is more a matter of propaganda than of warfare. From a military point of view, approaching the Dnipropetrovsk region or fighting on its outskirts is not a problem in itself. The point is what objects, with what forces and directions are being attacked, and how this 9/
comment in response to
post
These are the same battles in the "Dnepropetrovsk region" that the aggressor is so busy talking about. These battles have been going on in the Donetsk and Dnepropetrovsk regions for a long time, and Russia is trying to present the approach to the border as a grand victory for itself. 8/
comment in response to
post
It is also hot near Stupochki, but the Ukrainians defended themselves.
📍 Pokrovsk - Komar.
📎 The occupiers continue to actively attack on the southwestern flank of Pokrovsk, the most tense situation is in the Kotliarivka - Troitsk sector. 7/
comment in response to
post
📌 Donetsk direction.
📍 Konstyantynivka. The situation remains difficult on the western flank of Toretsk, and the aggressor continues to try to advance in the Chasiv Yar sector, thus pressuring the Ukrainian defenders in Konstyantynivka from the east. 6/
comment in response to
post
📍 Syversk. The aggressor managed to improve the situation in the ruins of Bilohorivka. This gives him the courage to attack deeper along the Syverskyi Donets River towards Hryhorivka. Ukrainian forces repelled these attacks. 5/
comment in response to
post
📌 Kharkiv direction.
Clashes continue in the Vovchansk sector. Both sides are preparing attacks in the ruins of the city.
📌 Luhansk direction.
📍 Kupjansk. No changes.
📍 Lyman. No changes. 4/
comment in response to
post
It is not ruled out that the Ukrainians will be forced to retreat from here. This would enable the aggressor not only to level the contact line in a direction beneficial to themselves, but also to take control of the entire Yablunivka - Volodymirivka - Gordeevka (Russia) road. 3/
comment in response to
post
📍 In the Sumy sector, the Russians managed to advance in the Yablunivka - Yunakivka section. In this way, the positions of the Ukrainian defenders located to the west in Novomykolaivka - Vakarychne are blocked from three sides. 2/
comment in response to
post
This factory directly cooperated with the Russian Ministry of Defense (more precisely, the Ministry of Mass Murders, run by war criminals), developing navigation equipment for the Russo-fascist military machine.
2/2
comment in response to
post
Or maybe some kind of spider web has made the Russians dizzy? 😏🕸 12/12
comment in response to
post
📌Maybe the same carriers that attacked the territory of Ukraine, or others, attacked?
📌I wonder if the Russian plans to strike (especially the strike range) with Kinzhals were adjusted by the fact that on Saturday an F16 shot down a Russian Su-35 over the Kursk region? 11/
comment in response to
post
📌I wonder if it is a coincidence that on the same night, when after a break of several months, one of the most intense strikes with Kinzhal missiles was carried out, all of them were shot down, and at the same time their carriers were attacked 10/
comment in response to
post
👉So in order to eliminate the advantages of the -Kinzhal, you need destroyer carriers. That is what is being done
👉It is important to mention that the Ukrainians usually record the takeoff of the Mig31K. And a related question from the couch, with a claim to conspiracy theory: 9/
comment in response to
post
One of the reasons that the attack was from the Tambov region. i.e. this time it was the limit of the Kinzhal flight range (about 500 km.). If the opponent's air defense is weaker, the aircraft flies closer and the effect of the supersonic missile can be much greater. 8/
comment in response to
post
So the main way to prevent such a strike is the opponent's fighters. If this means is weaker or does not work - we can only rely on missile defense. For example, this night the Ukrainians managed to shoot down all 4 Kinzhal missiles. 7/
comment in response to
post
Its greatest danger is that the missile with a range of up to 500 km is launched from an aircraft. In this way, the launch time is much faster than the launch of Iskander M from the ground, and the launch location changes by kilometers every second. 6/
comment in response to
post
True, during this war, Kinzhals are mainly Mig31K weapons. However, we cannot rule out that other aircraft are also used.
👉Kinzhal is not an invincible missile for Ukrainian air defense (it is essentially the same Iskander M). 5/
comment in response to
post
Video and photo images confirm that the Ukrainians destroyed 14 of them. According to public sources, the Russians had 56 of them, so after June 1. the Russians lost 25 percent of these aircraft. And how many more of them are under repair, used for parts? 4/
comment in response to
post
If the operation was successful, the Ukrainians damaged or destroyed two nuclear-capable missile carriers in one strike.
👉Coincidence or not, but on June 1. during the historic Ukrainian operation, another Kinzhal missile carrier suffered the most - strategic bombers Tu22M3. 3/
comment in response to
post
capable Kinzhal (Kh47) missile. The second aircraft, which is mentioned in the Ukrainian General Staff report, is a Su34 or Su30. If it is a Su34, then this aircraft is also a Kinzhal missile carrier. 2/
comment in response to
post
I completely agree that drone capabilities must be developed faster (and the experience of the UKR should be taken into account more quickly), but not INSTEAD of armor, but TOGETHER WITH armor. 8/8
comment in response to
post
In other words, the destruction rates correspond to the production/repair rates. If they had more, they would use more. 7/
comment in response to
post
Conclusions:
Tanks and heavy IFVs have not aged. Both sides actively use armor (if they have it). The recorded decrease in the number of destroyed Russian tanks (and other armor) is explained not so much by changed tactics as by depletion of reserves. 6/
comment in response to
post
The tank has become more important than ever. It has even taken over some roles that were previously carried out by lighter vehicles (medevac, troop transport, etc.). The more armor you have, the better."
qr.ae/pAJB3k 5/
comment in response to
post
Anything with less armor—including all russian/Soviet-produced infantry fighting vehicles (BMP-1, BMP-2, and BMP-3) and all APCs (armored personnel carriers)—is no longer battle-worthy. 4/
comment in response to
post
If you want to conduct more aggressive combat operations, you can only do so safely with a modern MBT, such as an Abrams or a Leopard 2, supported by armored infantry in Marder- or Bradley-class vehicles. 3/
comment in response to
post
In 2022, you could drive to the zero line (the line closest to the enemy) even in a Humvee, but because of the FPV drone threat, this is no longer possible.
Older MBTs, like the Leopard 1 or Russian T-72s, can still be used for infantry support. 2/
comment in response to
post
This only deepens the aggressor's problems in the Kursk direction, one of the essential components of which is the inability to ensure effective air and missile defense. 🤙
3/3
comment in response to
post
The Ukrainians shot down a Russian Su-35 fighter. True, it not only acts as an air defense platform, but can attack targets on the ground (air-to-ground missiles, KABs). So, as they say, the benefit is double 🤗
2/3
comment in response to
post
📎 The occupiers managed to advance to Troitsk and somewhat expand their southwestern wedge.
📌 Zaporizhia direction.
No changes.
📌 South direction.
No changes. 20/20
comment in response to
post
the most sophisticated drones are not enough to solve this problem. Along with drones and artillery fire (not instead of, but together), a counterattack by a maneuver unit is needed. So infantry, and preferably, riding an armored horse. Only with such actions can the wedges be cut off. 19/
comment in response to
post
foothold in the southern approaches to Komar and enter the nearby village of Fedorivka. And again, the same thin wedge that has been seen a dozen or so times and speculation about whether the Ukrainians will be able to cut it off. We have repeated and will repeat - 18/
comment in response to
post
The occupiers are also advancing in the direction of this settlement from the west of Novoolenivka.
📍 Pokrovsk – Komar.
📎 The situation near Komar is getting more complicated. After long attempts, the Russians managed to gain a 17/