feersumendjim.bsky.social
Political curmudgeon and rabbit enthusiast
27 posts
42 followers
25 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Farage's problem is that he's part of that machine.
Unless there's a material change to events...
If he goes against it, he's finished.
If he advocates for it, he's finished.
Whoops.
comment in response to
post
I don't think he's smart enough to understand the difference.
comment in response to
post
Hitler did the same thing and that worked out well for everyone.
Oh wait...
comment in response to
post
Jenrick?
What are they smoking at the Torygraph?
comment in response to
post
The Italian facists roman salute?
The Romans themselves did no such salute.
Even when they cover for him it's still bad.
comment in response to
post
Youre right, and the more I think about it, the more this plays into Trump's hands.
comment in response to
post
The next few years will be grim. He'll sit like a dead weight on our conscience and decency. But don't be taken in the triumphalism. Don't give up hope. These people are little wee cunts. They can be beaten. And in the end they will be.
comment in response to
post
Trump will ignore the pardons or change the convention.
He only gains from the breakdown in law and order.
comment in response to
post
Mike normally has more concrete information.
comment in response to
post
Trump will change the law on presidential pardons.
comment in response to
post
Well my grandparents started work before they were born and are still working now 30 years after they've died.
So I deserve all the things.
comment in response to
post
'Hurrah for the blackshirts' again is it?
Never knowingly on the right side of history.
comment in response to
post
Oh that's smooth.
Ai has moves.
comment in response to
post
Its giving me Jay vibes
comment in response to
post
Thoughts and MTG, in one sentence?
Yer asking a lot here God.
comment in response to
post
"Better too late than never"
comment in response to
post
Doesn't that rely on the idea that Musk is an extreme nutcase?
Musk doesn't want to be seen that way.
comment in response to
post
He's gorgeous, I wish I was in a position to help.
Where are you guys roughly based?
comment in response to
post
I think it's bigger than Bannon.
I'll never understand how Peter Thiel and Curtis Yarvin have avoided public scrutiny, but these are the people in the room with Trump, who funded Vance's career and Yarvin's views on democracy are basically that there shouldn't be one.
comment in response to
post
What's the betting he'll be openly calling for terrorism soon?
Paranoid me says this is an attempt to discredit and weaken the Labour govt's response to actual aggression towards Canada/Greenland/Panama/Mexico... etc.
Didn't think I'd be typing that a year ago.
comment in response to
post
It's not even what voters 2 months ago intended
comment in response to
post
She certainly picked an interesting day to align with a member of an administration threatening to invade half the Western hemisphere without cause.
She doesn't think more than an hour ahead of when she is.
comment in response to
post
The worst thing about this... it sounds so insane, but these people are in the room with Trump.
They are planning
www.theguardian.com/news/2022/se...
comment in response to
post
It's the disciplinary collars part that gets me.
They are specifically hiring the best trained, most resourceful killers in the world; how do they think that is going to play out?